RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Finding domain-general metacognitive mechanisms requires using appropriate tasks
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 211805
DO 10.1101/211805
A1 Eugene Ruby
A1 Nathan Giles
A1 Hakwan Lau
YR 2017
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/11/01/211805.abstract
AB An important yet unresolved question is whether or not metacognition consists of domain-general or domain-specific mechanisms. While most studies on this topic suggest a dissociation between metacognitive abilities at the neural level, there are conflicting reports at the behavioral level. Specifically, while McCurdy et al. (2013) found a positive correlation between metacognitive efficiency for visual perception and memory, Baird et al. (2013) didn’t find this correlation. One possible explanation for this disparity is that the former included two-alternative-forced choice (2AFC) judgments in both their visual and memory tasks, whereas the latter used 2AFC for one task and yes/no (YN) judgments for the other. In support of this hypothesis, we ran two online experiments meant to mirror McCurdy et al. (2013) and Baird et al. (2013) with considerable statistical power (n=100), and replicated the main findings of both studies. This suggests the finding of McCurdy et al (2013) was not a ‘fluke’ (i.e. false positive). In a third experiment with the same sample size, which included YN judgments for both tasks, we did not find a correlation between metacognitive functions, suggesting that the conflict between McCurdy et al. (2013) and Baird et al. (2013) stemmed from the use of YN judgments in the latter study. Our results underscore the need to avoid conflating 2AFC and YN judgments, which is a common problem.