TY - JOUR T1 - The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment JF - bioRxiv DO - 10.1101/696898 SP - 696898 AU - M. Jiang AU - B.E. Medlyn AU - J.E. Drake AU - R.A. Duursma AU - I.C. Anderson AU - C.V.M. Barton AU - M.M. Boer AU - Y. Carrillo AU - L. Castañeda-Gómez AU - L. Collins AU - K.Y. Crous AU - M.G. De Kauwe AU - K.M. Emmerson AU - S.L. Facey AU - A.N. Gherlenda AU - T.E. Gimeno AU - S. Hasegawa AU - S.N. Johnson AU - C.A. Macdonald AU - K. Mahmud AU - B.D. Moore AU - L. Nazaries AU - U.N. Nielsen AU - N.J. Noh AU - R. Ochoa-Hueso AU - V.S. Pathare AU - E. Pendall AU - J. Pineiro AU - J.R. Powell AU - S.A. Power AU - P.B. Reich AU - A.A. Renchon AU - M. Riegler AU - P. Rymer AU - R.L. Salomón AU - B.K. Singh AU - B. Smith AU - M.G. Tjoelker AU - J.K.M. Walker AU - A. Wujeska-Klause AU - J. Yang AU - S. Zaehle AU - D.S. Ellsworth Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/07/11/696898.abstract N2 - Atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment (eCO2) can enhance plant carbon uptake and growth1,2,3,4,5, thereby providing an important negative feedback to climate change by slowing the rate of increase of the atmospheric CO2 concentration6. While evidence gathered from young aggrading forests has generally indicated a strong CO2 fertilization effect on biomass growth3,4,5, it is unclear whether mature forests respond to eCO2 in a similar way. In mature trees and forest stands7,8,9,10, photosynthetic uptake has been found to increase under eCO2 without any apparent accompanying growth response, leaving an open question about the fate of additional carbon fixed under eCO24, 5, 7,8,9,10,11. Here, using data from the first ecosystem-scale Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment in a mature forest, we constructed a comprehensive ecosystem carbon budget to track the fate of carbon as the forest responds to four years of eCO2 exposure. We show that, although the eCO2 treatment of ambient +150 ppm (+38%) induced a 12% (+247 gCm-2yr-1) increase in carbon uptake through gross primary production, this additional carbon uptake did not lead to increased carbon sequestration at the ecosystem level. Instead, the majority of the extra carbon was emitted back into the atmosphere via several respiratory fluxes, with increased soil respiration alone contributing ∼50% of the total uptake surplus. Our results call into question the predominant thinking that the capacity of forests to act as carbon sinks will be generally enhanced under eCO2, and challenge the efficacy of climate mitigation strategies that rely on CO2 fertilization as a driver of increased carbon sinks in standing forests and afforestation projects. ER -