PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nelly Matorina
AU  - Jordan Poppenk
TI  - REM negatively predicts statistical learning but not other forms of gist
AID  - 10.1101/578492
DP  - 2019 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 578492
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/08/16/578492.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/08/16/578492.full
AB  - Human memory for recent events is believed to undergo reactivation during sleep. This process is thought to be relevant for the consolidation of both individual episodic memories and gist extraction, the formation of generalized memory representations from multiple, related memories. Which kinds of gist are actually enhanced, however, is the subject of less consensus. To address this question, we focused our design on four types of gist: inferential gist (relations extracted across non-contiguous events), statistical learning (regularities extracted from a series), summary gist (a theme abstracted from a temporally contiguous series of items), and category gist (characterization of a stimulus at a higher level in the semantic hierarchy). Sixty-nine participants (30 men, 38 women, and 1 other) completed memory encoding tasks addressing these types of gist and corresponding retrieval tasks the same evening, the morning after, and one week later. Inferential gist was retained over a week, whereas memory for category gist, summary gist, and statistical learning decayed. Higher proportions of REM were associated with worse performance in a statistical learning task controlling for time. Our results support that REM sleep is involved in schema disintegration, which works against participants’ ability to identify regularities within temporal series.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT To gain the most from our experiences, we extract from them the most important elements, or “gist”, with sleep believed to facilitate this process. However, what is referred to as gist varies considerably across studies. We report categorically different mnemonic trajectories of two classes of gist. In particular, we show that gist involving synthesis across relational memories is retained over time, whereas other gists were subject to substantial decay. These findings advance our understanding both of gist and of sleep-based memory consolidation. Moreover, by showing REM appears to work against, rather than for rule-based consolidation, our evidence supports the idea that REM works to discretize, rather than synthesize experiences.