PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nicole S. Rafidi
AU  - Justin C. Hulbert
AU  - Paula Pacheco
AU  - Kenneth A. Norman
TI  - Reductions in Retrieval Competition Predict the Benefit of Repeated Testing
AID  - 10.1101/292557
DP  - 2018 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 292557
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/03/30/292557.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/03/30/292557.full
AB  - Repeated testing leads to improved long-term memory retention compared to repeated study, but the mechanism underlying this improvement remains controversial. In this work, we test the hypothesis that retrieval practice benefits subsequent recall by reducing competition from related memories. This hypothesis implies that the degree of reduction in competition between retrieval practice attempts should predict subsequent memory for practiced items. To test this prediction, we collected electroencephalography (EEG) data across two sessions. In the first session, participants practiced selectively retrieving exemplars from superordinate semantic categories (high competition), as well as retrieving the names of the superordinate categories from exemplars (low competition). In the second session, participants repeatedly studied and were tested on Swahili-English vocabulary. One week after session two, participants were again tested on the vocabulary. We trained a within-subject classifier on the data from session one to distinguish high and low competition states.We then used this classifier to measure competition across multiple retrieval practice attempts in the second session. The degree to which competition decreased for a given vocabulary word predicted whether that item was subsequently remembered in the third session. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that repeated testing improves retention by reducing competition.