RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 DateLife: Leveraging databases and analytical tools to reveal the dated Tree of Life
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 782094
DO 10.1101/782094
A1 Luna L. Sánchez-Reyes
A1 Brian C. O’Meara
YR 2019
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/05/782094.abstract
AB The combination of new analytical techniques, availability of more fossil and molecular data, and better practices in data sharing has resulted in a steady accumulation of chronograms in public and open databases such as TreeBASE, Dryad, and Open Tree of Life for a large quantity and diversity of organisms in the last few decades. However, getting a tree with branch lengths proportional to time remains difficult for many biologists and the non-academic community, despite its importance in many areas of research, education, and science communication. datelife is a service implemented via an R package and a web site (http://www.datelife.org/) for efficient reuse, summary and reanalysis of published data on lineage divergence times. The main workflow starts with at least two taxon names as input, either as tip labels on a tree, or as a simple comma separated character string. A name search is then performed across the chronogram database and positively identified source trees are pruned to maintain queried taxa only and stored as a named list of patristic distance matrices. Source chronogram data can be summarised using branch length summary statistics or variance minimizing approaches to generate a single summary chronogram. Source chronogram data can also be used as calibration points to date a tree containing some or all names from the initial query. If there is no information available for any queried taxa, data can be simulated. All source and summary chronograms can be saved in formats that permit easy reuse and reanalysis. Summary and newly generated trees are potentially useful to evaluate evolutionary hypothesis in different areas of research in biology. How well this trees work for this purpose still needs to be tested. datelife will be useful to increase awereness on the existing variation in expert time of divergence data, and might foster exploration of the effect of alternative divergence time hypothesis on the results of analyses, nurturing a culture of more cautious interpretation of evolutionary results.