RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 The DNA damage response regulates the oocyte pool in mammals JF bioRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory SP 816488 DO 10.1101/816488 A1 Martínez-Marchal, Ana A1 Guillot, Maria Teresa A1 Ferrer, Mònica A1 Guixé, Anna A1 Garcia-Caldés, Montserrat A1 Roig, Ignasi YR 2019 UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/24/816488.abstract AB Mammalian oogonia proliferate without completing cytokinesis producing germ cell cysts. Within these cysts, oocytes differentiate and enter meiosis, promote genome-wide double-strand break (DSBs) formation which repair by homologous recombination leads to synapsis of the homologous chromosomes. Errors in homologous recombination or synapsis trigger the activation of surveillance mechanisms, traditionally called ‘pachytene checkpoint’, to either repair them or send the cells to programmed death. Contrary to what is found in spermatocytes, most oocytes present a remarkable persistence of unrepaired DSBs at pachynema. Simultaneously, there is a massive oocyte death accompanying the oocyte cyst breakdown. This oocyte elimination is thought to be required to properly form the follicles, which constitute the pool of germ cells females will use during their adult life. Based on all the above mentioned, we hypothesized that the apparently inefficient meiotic recombination occurring in mouse oocytes may be required to eliminate most of the oocytes in order to regulate the oocyte number, promote cyst breakdown and follicle formation in mammalian females. To test this idea, we analyzed perinatal ovaries to evaluate the oocyte population, cyst breakdown and follicle formation in control and mutant mice for the effector kinase of the DNA damage response, CHK2. Our results confirm the involvement of CHK2 in the elimination of oocytes that accumulate unrepaired DSBs and show that CHK2 regulates the number of oocytes in fetal ovaries. We also show that CHK2 is required to eliminate oocytes as a result of LINE-1 activation, which was previously shown to be responsible for fetal oocyte loss. Nonetheless, the number of oocytes found in Chk2 mutant ovaries three days after birth was similar to that of control ovaries, suggesting the existence of CHK2-independent mechanisms capable of eliminating oocytes. In vitro inhibition of CHK1 rescued the oocyte number in Chk2 mutant ovaries suggesting that CHK1 regulates postnatal oocyte death. Moreover, both CHK1 and CHK2 functions are required to timely breakdown cyst and form follicles. Altogether, we propose the DNA damage response controls the number of oocytes present perinatally and is required to properly break down oocyte cysts and form follicles, highlighting the importance of the DNA damage response in setting the reserve of oocytes each female will use during their entire lifespan.