Regular ArticlesCommunication in crested tits and the risk of predation
References (43)
- et al.
Alarm calling by individual willow tits, Parus montanus
Animal Behaviour
(1990) The effect of predation on begging-call evolution in nestling wood warblers
Animal Behaviour
(1999)- et al.
Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection
- et al.
Diana monkey long-distance calls: messages for conspecifics and predators
Animal Behaviour
(1997) Noise reduction by vegetation and ground
Journal of Acoustical Society of America
(1971)- et al.
Stimmen der Vögel Europas
(1982) - et al.
Principles of Animal Communication
(1998) Song as a pursuit-deterrence signal and its occurrence relative to other antipredator behaviors of the skylark on attack by merlins
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
(1994)Coherence, composition and territories of winter social groups of the willow tit Parus montanus and the crested tit P. cristatus
Ornis Scandinavica
(1979)Tree use and predator vulnerability of wintering passerines
Ornis Scandinavica
(1986)
Signalling of need by offspring to their parents
Nature
Physiological constraints on sexual selection
Experimental evidence that nestlings' begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B
The Evolution of Communication
Social rank and antipredator behaviour of willow tits Parus montanus in winter flocks
Ibis
Winter mortality and food supply in tits Parus spp
Oikos
The effects of provision of food in winter on a population of the great tit Parus major and the blue tit P. caeruleus
Ornis Scandinavica
Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context. I. Factors affecting the structure of alarm signals. II. The functional significance and evolution of alarm signals
Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie
The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Do subordinates expose themselves to predation? Field experiments on feeding site selection by willow tits
Journal of Avian Biology
Predation risk and shifts of foraging sites in mixed willow and crested tit flocks
Journal of Avian Biology
Cited by (70)
Mobbing in animals: A thorough review and proposed future directions
2022, Advances in the Study of BehaviorCitation Excerpt :For example, during a long-term study of Siberian jays, Perisoreus infaustus, five mobbing events were observed during 2300 field days, and no individual was killed during these events, but hawks and owls account for 95% of deaths of adults (Curio & Regelmann, 1986; Griesser et al., 2017). Also, there is little evidence regarding the cost of a mobber drawing attention to itself with conspicuous signals (Krams, 2001) and therefore possibly increasing the chance of being singled out for an attack. In addition to direct costs discussed above, there are as yet unexplored indirect costs to mobbing, including (1) the energetic costs (as this behavior is often quite vigorous in nature with increased movement and calling; Crofoot, 2012), (2) attracting other predators, (e.g., nest predators, Krams, Krama, Igaune, & Mänd, 2007; or predators of adults, Fang, Hsu, Lin, & Yen, 2020; Smith, 1968), and (3) lost opportunity costs, as mobbing prevents the expression of other behaviors (e.g., foraging or singing to attract a mate, Caro, 2005; Cresswell, 2008; Crofoot, 2012).
Experimental manipulation of mixed-species flocks reveals heterospecific audience effects on calling
2020, Animal BehaviourCitation Excerpt :The dilution effect, in addition to the many-eyes effect, explains why individual vigilance behaviour decreases as group size increases (Roberts, 1996). Under this hypothesis, individuals should call more with increasing numbers of chickadees and titmice, specifically in conditions of increased risk, under the assumption that calling in risky contexts increases the caller's likelihood of predation (e.g. increased predation in crested tits, Parus cristatus: Krams, 2001; increased nest predation in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca: Krams, Krama, Igaune, & Mand, 2007). Additionally, mobbing intensity of both chickadees and titmice increases with presence of heterospecifics in flocks (Nolen & Lucas, 2009).
Cognitive Control of Escape Behaviour
2019, Trends in Cognitive SciencesInsect noise avoidance in the dawn chorus of Neotropical birds
2016, Animal BehaviourQuiet threats: Soft song as an aggressive signal in birds
2015, Animal BehaviourCitation Excerpt :Predators and other natural enemies have been shown to locate prey by their auditory signals in a number of systems, including bats feeding on frogs (Tuttle & Ryan, 1981), skuas preying on petrels (Mougeot & Bretagnolle, 2000) and parasitoid flies attacking crickets (Cade, 1975). For birds, it is generally presumed that producing loud vocal signals is dangerous (Hale, 2004; Krams, 2001; Lima, 2009; Mougeot & Bretagnolle, 2000; Schmidt & Belinsky, 2013). These signals may be particularly risky during aggressive interactions when the attention of the singer is occupied by the intruder.
A cry for help: Female distress calling during copulation is context dependent
2014, Animal BehaviourCitation Excerpt :Benefits from uttering distress calls can be both direct and indirect: direct, if an unwanted copulation is interrupted and indirect, if making the distress calls contributes to biased copulation success in favour of a dominant male (Pizzari, 2001). Producing loud noises to attract the attention of dominant males will, however, potentially also attract undesired males or predators within receiving range of the call (Högstedt, 1983; Klump & Shalter, 1984; Koenig et al., 1991; Krams, 2001). Such undesirable attention may affect females' propensity to utter distress calls under certain social or environmental conditions.
- f1
Correspondence: I. Krams, Department of Sciences, Daugavpils University, LV-5400 Daugavpils, Latvia (email:[email protected]).