Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 61, Issue 6, June 2001, Pages 1065-1068
Animal Behaviour

Regular Articles
Communication in crested tits and the risk of predation

https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1702Get rights and content

Abstract

It is usually assumed that communication between forest birds is costly in terms of predation. However, there is no direct empirical evidence of these costs. I examined whether contact calls of crested tits, Parus cristatus, could attract predators during the nonbreeding season. I compared attack rates on life-like stuffed specimens with and without playbacks of trilled long-range calls and high-pitched, short-range calls. Crested tit models without playbacks were used as controls. Crested tit models with playbacks of long-range contact calls were attacked significantly more often by sparrowhawks,Accipiter nisus , than the models with playbacks of high-pitched sounds and those without playbacks. These results suggest that calling increases the risk of predation for wintering tits and provide support for the assumption that conspicuous long-distance calling is costly in terms of predation. That models with playbacks of high-pitched signals were attacked at lower rates may indicate that predators cannot hear short-range communication calls as well as the long-range calls.

References (43)

  • H.C.J Godfray

    Signalling of need by offspring to their parents

    Nature

    (1991)
  • T.R Halliday

    Physiological constraints on sexual selection

  • D Haskell

    Experimental evidence that nestlings' begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B

    (1994)
  • M.D Hauser

    The Evolution of Communication

    (1996)
  • O Hogstad

    Social rank and antipredator behaviour of willow tits Parus montanus in winter flocks

    Ibis

    (1988)
  • C Jansson et al.

    Winter mortality and food supply in tits Parus spp

    Oikos

    (1981)
  • H Källander

    The effects of provision of food in winter on a population of the great tit Parus major and the blue tit P. caeruleus

    Ornis Scandinavica

    (1981)
  • G.M Klump et al.

    Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context. I. Factors affecting the structure of alarm signals. II. The functional significance and evolution of alarm signals

    Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie

    (1984)
  • G.M Klump et al.

    The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

    (1986)
  • K Koivula et al.

    Do subordinates expose themselves to predation? Field experiments on feeding site selection by willow tits

    Journal of Avian Biology

    (1994)
  • I.A Krams

    Predation risk and shifts of foraging sites in mixed willow and crested tit flocks

    Journal of Avian Biology

    (1996)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Mobbing in animals: A thorough review and proposed future directions

      2022, Advances in the Study of Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, during a long-term study of Siberian jays, Perisoreus infaustus, five mobbing events were observed during 2300 field days, and no individual was killed during these events, but hawks and owls account for 95% of deaths of adults (Curio & Regelmann, 1986; Griesser et al., 2017). Also, there is little evidence regarding the cost of a mobber drawing attention to itself with conspicuous signals (Krams, 2001) and therefore possibly increasing the chance of being singled out for an attack. In addition to direct costs discussed above, there are as yet unexplored indirect costs to mobbing, including (1) the energetic costs (as this behavior is often quite vigorous in nature with increased movement and calling; Crofoot, 2012), (2) attracting other predators, (e.g., nest predators, Krams, Krama, Igaune, & Mänd, 2007; or predators of adults, Fang, Hsu, Lin, & Yen, 2020; Smith, 1968), and (3) lost opportunity costs, as mobbing prevents the expression of other behaviors (e.g., foraging or singing to attract a mate, Caro, 2005; Cresswell, 2008; Crofoot, 2012).

    • Experimental manipulation of mixed-species flocks reveals heterospecific audience effects on calling

      2020, Animal Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      The dilution effect, in addition to the many-eyes effect, explains why individual vigilance behaviour decreases as group size increases (Roberts, 1996). Under this hypothesis, individuals should call more with increasing numbers of chickadees and titmice, specifically in conditions of increased risk, under the assumption that calling in risky contexts increases the caller's likelihood of predation (e.g. increased predation in crested tits, Parus cristatus: Krams, 2001; increased nest predation in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca: Krams, Krama, Igaune, & Mand, 2007). Additionally, mobbing intensity of both chickadees and titmice increases with presence of heterospecifics in flocks (Nolen & Lucas, 2009).

    • Cognitive Control of Escape Behaviour

      2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
    • Quiet threats: Soft song as an aggressive signal in birds

      2015, Animal Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      Predators and other natural enemies have been shown to locate prey by their auditory signals in a number of systems, including bats feeding on frogs (Tuttle & Ryan, 1981), skuas preying on petrels (Mougeot & Bretagnolle, 2000) and parasitoid flies attacking crickets (Cade, 1975). For birds, it is generally presumed that producing loud vocal signals is dangerous (Hale, 2004; Krams, 2001; Lima, 2009; Mougeot & Bretagnolle, 2000; Schmidt & Belinsky, 2013). These signals may be particularly risky during aggressive interactions when the attention of the singer is occupied by the intruder.

    • A cry for help: Female distress calling during copulation is context dependent

      2014, Animal Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      Benefits from uttering distress calls can be both direct and indirect: direct, if an unwanted copulation is interrupted and indirect, if making the distress calls contributes to biased copulation success in favour of a dominant male (Pizzari, 2001). Producing loud noises to attract the attention of dominant males will, however, potentially also attract undesired males or predators within receiving range of the call (Högstedt, 1983; Klump & Shalter, 1984; Koenig et al., 1991; Krams, 2001). Such undesirable attention may affect females' propensity to utter distress calls under certain social or environmental conditions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    Correspondence: I. Krams, Department of Sciences, Daugavpils University, LV-5400 Daugavpils, Latvia (email:[email protected]).

    View full text