Regular Article
Analysis of Striatal Dynamics: The Existence of Two Modes of Behaviour

https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1993.1128Get rights and content

Abstract

The qualitative dynamical behaviour of a neural model based on the mammalian neostriatum was analysed. The neostriatum was modelled as a mutually inhibitory network of physiological neurones, which was driven by excitatory afferents from the cerebral cortex. The analysis defined the conditions under which the system would enter into one of two dynamic modes, competition or co-activation, in terms of the parameters defining receptor-operated and voltage-sensitive channels in the neuronal membrane. We have previously argued that the mode of co-activation in the neostriatum may correspond to the state of muscular rigidity which occurs as a symptom of Parkinson's disease. The present work extends a preliminary analysis of a two-neurone system to a system of arbitrary size. An explicit prediction is made of the conditions under which a transition from co-activation to competition will occur, which is testable experimentally. The wavelength of a non-uniform activity pattern produced by small departures from uniform afferent drive is determined for one- and two-dimensional arrays of neurones. Two mild assumptions about the connectivity of the network were used to simplify the analysis, namely that the network was symmetric and homogeneous. The implications of departures from these assumptions for understanding the disordered movement seen in Huntington's disease are also considered.

References (0)

Cited by (23)

  • Brain-inspired meta-reinforcement learning cognitive control in conflictual inhibition decision-making task for artificial agents

    2022, Neural Networks
    Citation Excerpt :

    The action values are initialized at the beginning of the experiment, updated automatically after the action execution (salient events, such as after reward or punishment delivery) and reset after the completion of a block of trials (except for the action value encoding the action inhibition). The basal ganglia layers transfer the information from the LFPC layer to the PMC, implementing a winner-take-all mechanism to prevent the execution of two actions at the same time (Alexander & Wickens, 1993; Berns & Sejnowski, 1996; Binas et al., 2014; Humphries, 2014). If the activity related to a non-selected action remains non-null, the competing mechanism is performed by a double inhibitory synapse, i.e., the first one between the striatum and the SNr and the second between the SNr and thalamus.

  • Dopamine-modulated dynamic cell assemblies generated by the GABAergic striatal microcircuit

    2009, Neural Networks
    Citation Excerpt :

    Many theories of striatal-specific or global basal ganglia function draw explicit attention to the role of the inhibitory local MSN collaterals as a substrate for competitive dynamics (e.g. Beiser & Houk, 1998; Frank, 2005; Pennartz, Groenewegen, & da Silva, 1994; Wickens, Alexander, & Miller, 1991), whether that competition be labelled ‘decision making’, ‘motor program selection’ or ‘pattern classification’. Wickens and colleagues’ domain hypothesis is the most developed, and proposes that the basic computational element of the striatum is the set–or “domain”–of all MSNs that are mutual inhibitory (see e.g. Alexander & Wickens, 1993; Wickens et al., 1991; Wickens, Kotter, & Alexander, 1995). In simulation, they have shown that winner-takes-all like competition occurs within a single domain, while winners-share-all dynamics (multiple active neurons) occur in networks composed of multiple overlapping domains (Alexander & Wickens, 1993; Wickens et al., 1991).

  • Simulation of GABA function in the basal ganglia: computational models of GABAergic mechanisms in basal ganglia function

    2007, Progress in Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    This dynamic may be necessary to prevent cocontraction of groups of muscular antagonists in movement. In Parkinson's disease, in which cocontraction replaces reciprocal inhibition of muscles at the onset of movements, this dynamic may break down (Wickens et al., 1991; Alexander and Wickens, 1993). The computational operation performed by WTA type networks appears deceptively simple, when in fact it is a computationally demanding operation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text