Elsevier

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volume 200, Issue 2, 21 September 1999, Pages 207-222
Journal of Theoretical Biology

Regular Article
Modeling Activation and Desensitization of G-Protein Coupled Receptors Provides Insight into Ligand Efficacy

https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1999.0988Get rights and content

Abstract

Signaling through G-protein coupled receptors is one of the most prevalent and important methods of transmitting information to the inside of cells. Many mathematical models have been proposed to describe this type of signal transduction, and the ternary complex (ligand/receptor/G-protein) model and its derivatives are among the most widely accepted. Current versions of these equilibrium models include both active (i.e. signaling) and inactive conformations of the receptor, but do not include the dynamics of G-protein activation or receptor desensitization. Yet understanding how these dynamic events effect response behavior is crucial to determining ligand efficacy. We developed a mathematical model for G-protein coupled receptor signaling that includes G-protein activation and receptor desensitization, and used it to predict how activation and desensitization would change if either the conformational selectivity (the effect of ligand binding on the distribution of active and inactive receptor states) or the desensitization rate constant was ligand-specific. In addition, the model was used to explore the implications of measuring responses far downstream from G-protein activation. By comparing the experimental data from theβ2 -adrenergic, μ -opioid, D1dopamine, and neutrophil N -formyl peptide receptors with the predictions of our model, we found that the conformational selectivity is the predominant factor in determining the amounts of activation and desensitization caused by a particular ligand.

References (42)

  • L.D. SHEA et al.

    Mechanistic model of G-protein signal transduction. Determinants of efficacy and effect of precoupled receptors

    Biochem. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • L.A. SKLAR et al.

    Regulation of ligand–receptor dynamics by guanine nucleotides: real-time analysis of interconverting states for the neutrophil formyl peptide receptor

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1987)
  • J.P. TRZECIAKOWSKI

    Analysis of stimulus–response chains using nonlinear dynamics

    J. Pharm. Tox. Meth.

    (1996)
  • J.M. WEISS et al.

    The cubic ternary complex receptor-occupancy model I. Model description

    J. theor. Biol.

    (1996)
  • A.J. BALMFORTH et al.

    Homologous desensitization of the D1dopamine receptor

    J. Neurochem.

    (1990)
  • A.C. BARTON et al.

    Agonist-induced desensitization of D1-dopamine receptors linked to adenyl cyclase activity in cultured NS20Y neuroblastoma cells

    Mol. Pharm.

    (1990)
  • G.M. BOKOCH et al.

    Subcellular localization and quantification of the major neutrophil pertussis toxin substrate, Gn

    J. Cell. Biol.

    (1988)
  • D. BRAY

    Signaling complexes: biophysical constraints on intracellular communication

    Ann. Rev. Biomol. Struct.

    (1998)
  • A.J. CLARK

    General pharmacology

    (1937)
  • D. COLQUHOUN

    Binding, gating, affinity and efficacy: the interpretation of structure-activity relationships for agonists and of the effects of mutating receptors

    Brit. J. Pharmacol.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Kinetic operational models of agonism for G-protein-coupled receptors

      2018, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consequently, the maximum value of this technology might not be being realized. At present, models of GPCR response are typically used to simulate system behavior, rather than to provide estimates of pharmacological activity by fitting curves to data (Riccobene et al., 1999; Shea and Linderman, 1997; Waelbroeck, 2001; Woodroffe et al., 2009). These models provide considerable insight into mechanisms of signaling but are not designed to provide estimates of macroscopic pharmacological parameters like efficacy and potency.

    • Shear-Induced Nitric Oxide Production by Endothelial Cells

      2016, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      We build upon these and other previous efforts to develop a comprehensive model of NO production in ECs, which describes the biochemical reaction cascade induced by the three types of mechanosensors (MSICs, GPCRs, and integrins). Specifically, it relies on the experimental and modeling studies (7,13–15,17,19,20,24) to represent both the calcium influx via MSICs and the activation of GPCRs and PI3K as functions of the applied shear stress. Our model accounts for the formation of calcium-CaM complexes, which leads to the recruitment of eNOS into an eNOS-CaM complex; the latter is subsequently phosphorylated by AKT (4), the details of which have been ignored in previous studies (17–22).

    • Computational Challenges in Systems Biology

      2009, Systems Biomedicine: Concepts and Perspectives
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text