Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 6, Issue 4, November 1997, Pages 320-334
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Neural Systems Shared by Visual Imagery and Visual Perception: A Positron Emission Tomography Study

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0295Get rights and content

Abstract

Subjects participated in perceptual and imagery tasks while their brains were scanned using positron emission tomography. In the perceptual conditions, subjects judged whether names were appropriate for pictures. In one condition, the objects were pictured from canonical perspectives and could be recognized at first glance; in the other, the objects were pictured from noncanonical perspectives and were not immediately recognizable. In this second condition, we assume that top-down processing is used to evaluate the names. In the imagery conditions, subjects saw a grid with a single X mark; a lowercase letter was presented before the grid. In the baseline condition, they simply responded when they saw the stimulus, whereas in the imagery condition they visualized the corresponding block letter in the grid and decided whether it would have covered the X if it were physically present. Fourteen areas were activated in common by both tasks, only 1 of which may not be involved in visual processing (the precentral gyrus); in addition, 2 were activated in perception but not imagery, and 5 were activated in imagery but not perception. Thus, two-thirds of the activated areas were activated in common.

References (67)

  • D.C. Van Essen et al.

    Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1983)
  • N.M. Alpert et al.

    Stereotactic transformation of PET scans by nonlinear least squares

    Quantification of Brain Function: Tracer Kinetics and Image Analysis in Brain PET

    (1993)
  • R.A. Andersen

    Inferior parietal lobule function in spatial perception and visuomotor integration

  • R.A. Andersen et al.

    Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons

    Science

    (1985)
  • M. Behrmann et al.

    Dissociation between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient

    Nature

    (1992)
  • B.M. Bly et al.

    Functional anatomy of object recognition in humans: evidence from positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Curr. Opin. Neurol.

    (1997)
  • S.A. Brandt et al.

    Experimental evidence for scanpath eye movements during visual imagery

    Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Conference on Engineering, Medicine, and Biology.

    (1989)
  • M. Corbetta et al.

    A PET study of visuospatial attention

    J. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • D. Costin

    MacLab: A MacIntosh system for psychology lab

    Behav. Res. Methods Instrument. Comput.

    (1988)
  • C. Craver-Lemley et al.

    Visual imagery selectively reduces vernier acuity

    Perception

    (1987)
  • H. Damasio et al.

    Visual recall with eyes closed and covered activates early visual cortices

    Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.

    (1993)
  • E.A. DeYoe et al.

    Multiple processing streams in occipitotemporal visual cortex

    Nature

    (1994)
  • K.L. Douglas et al.

    Extensive visual feedback connections from ventral inferotemporal cortex

    Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.

    (1992)
  • M.J. Farah

    Is visual imagery really visual? Overlooked evidence from neuropsychology

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1988)
  • M.J. Farah et al.

    Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts

    J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.

    (1988)
  • D.J. Felleman et al.

    Distributed hierarchical processing in primate cerebral cortex

    Cereb. Cortex

    (1991)
  • R.A. Finke et al.

    Visual functions of mental imagery

  • R.A. Finke et al.

    Memory confusions for real and imagined completions of symmetrical visual patterns

    Memory Cognit.

    (1988)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Comparing functional (PET) images: The assessment of significant changes

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (1991)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach

    Hum. Brain Map.

    (1995)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent

    Hum. Brain Map.

    (1994)
  • I. Fujita et al.

    Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex

    Nature

    (1992)
  • P.S. Goldman-Rakic

    Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational knowledge

  • Cited by (251)

    • Nature guided imagery: An intervention to increase connectedness to nature

      2022, Journal of Environmental Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A host of prior research has investigated the effects of GI on the brain. Kosslyn et al. (1997) found there to be 14 common areas of the brain activated for both visual perception and prompted visual imagery. Indeed, Ganis et al. (2004) showed, via fMRI, that there is extensive overlap in neural structures engaged during both visual perception and imagery; that is, between real and imagined experiences.

    • Visual mental imagery: Inside the mind's eyes

      2022, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The central claim of this model postulates a substantial overlap between neural substrates supporting visual mental imagery and visual perception, including early visual areas. For instance, numerous early studies using positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) observed an increase in activation during mental imagery in the primary (V1 or Brodmann Area 17) and secondary (V2 or Brodmann area 18) visual cortices (e.g., Kosslyn et al., 1993; Klein et al., 2000; Mellet et al., 2000b), paralleling the neural activation associated with visual perception (Kosslyn et al., 1997; Ganis et al., 2004). Further support for the equivalence between neural substrates of imagery and perception came from studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a neuroimaging method that allows to excite or inhibit a targeted brain region (see for example Ruff et al., 2009 for a review on TMS).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    K. UemuraN. A. LassenT. JonesI. Kanno, Eds.

    1

    To whom reprint requests should be addressed at 832 William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138.

    View full text