Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 16, Issue 4, August 2002, Pages 1068-1083
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Multivariate Model Specification for fMRI Data

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1094Get rights and content

Abstract

We present a general method—denoted MoDef—to help specify (or define) the model used to analyze brain imaging data. This method is based on the use of the multivariate linear model on a training data set. We show that when the a priori knowledge about the expected brain response is not too precise, the method allows for the specification of a model that yields a better sensitivity in the statistical results. This obviously relies on the validity of the a priori information, in our case the representativity of the training set, an issue addressed using a cross-validation technique. We propose a fast implementation that allows the use of the method on large data sets as found with functional Magnetic Resonance Images. An example of application is given on an experimental fMRI data set that includes nine subjects who performed a mental computation task. Results show that the method increases the statistical sensitivity of fMRI analyses.

References (37)

  • K.J. Worsley et al.

    Characterizing the response of pet and fmri data using multivariate linear models

    Neuroimage

    (1997)
  • K.J. Worsley et al.

    Tests for distributed, nonfocal brain activations

    Neuroimage

    (1995)
  • H. Akaike

    A new look at the statistical model identification

    IEEE Trans. Auto. Control

    (1974)
  • E. Bullmore et al.

    Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional mr image analysis

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1996)
  • E. Bullmore et al.

    Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fmri) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2001)
  • M.A. Burock et al.

    Estimation and detection of event-related fMRI signals with temporally correlated noise: A statistically efficient and unbiased approach

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2000)
  • Caussinus

    Models and Uses of Principal Components Analysis

    (1985)
  • F. Chochon et al.

    Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (59)

    • Temporal trajectory of brain tissue property changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      This strategy is known to inflate the type I error rate and does not model the relationship between dependent variables Fox (2015). The use of multivariate statistics allows for assessing how a combination of dependent variables reflects an effect of interest, and thus provides more information than the univariate GLM approach (McFarquhar et al., 2016, Stoyanov et al., 2019, Zufferey et al., 2017, Kherif et al., 2002 Aug 1). The recently proposed implementation of multivariate GLM for neuroimaging data (McFarquhar et al., 2016), facilitates the modelling of either multi-contrast datasets or repeated measures datasets, but do not handle the case of datasets that have both characteristics.

    • Principal component analysis

      2019, Machine Learning: Methods and Applications to Brain Disorders
    • How to avoid mismodelling in GLM-based fMRI data analysis: cross-validated Bayesian model selection

      2016, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Beyond this naïve approach, the problem of model misspecification in fMRI analysis has been recognized by researchers and a number of strategies have been developed to deal with potential mismodelling. Kherif and Loh have proposed algorithms for model optimization, but they only allow inference pertaining to nested model comparisons (Kherif et al., 2002) and condition regressor timing (Loh et al., 2008). Razavi et al. (2003) investigated model accuracy based on the goodness of fit, but do not consider model complexity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text