Skip to main content
Log in

A cytogenetic analysis of meiotic drive in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.)

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Meiotic drive in Aedes aegypti (L.) is shown by a Giemsa C-banding technique to be associated with preferential isochromatid breakage of the X chromosome during male meiosis. These breaks remain open at least until anaphase-I and, since the range of cells affected is proportional to the sensitivity of the X chromosome to the Distorter gene, it is argued that they are directly related to the decreased number of spermatozoa found in distorting males. This reduction is considered to be attributable to the degeneration of more X- than Y-bearing spermatids but it is probable that some non-functional X-bearing spermatozoa are also produced. Chromosome breakage is almost completely confined to four sites, two adjacent to the centromere, one just proximal to the intercalary band and another about the centre of the unbanded arm. Although the first three of these lie within a region in which crossing-over does not take place, fragmentation occurs more frequently in a chiasmate arm than in one devoid of chromatid exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akstein, E. (1962). The chromosomes of Aedes aegypti, and of some other species of mosquitoes. Bull. Res. Coun. Israel 11B3: 146–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, S. C. (1970). Paracentric inversions and detection of sex linked recessive lethals in Aedes aegypti. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 12: 635–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, S. C. (1973). Sex-linked translocations, semisterility and linkage alterations in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 15: 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brat, S. V. & K. S., Rai (1973). An analysis of chiasma frequencies in Aedes aegypti. Nucleus, Calcutto 16: 184–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. R. & R., Moav (1957). Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacum. XXVII. Pollen killer, an alien genetic locus inducing abortion of microspores not carrying it. Genetics, Princeton 42: 326–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophers, S. R. (1960). Aedes aegypti (L.). The yellow fever mosquito. University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, K. W. (1965). Normal spermatogenesis in Drosophila. In: M., Demerec, (Ed.), Biology of Drosophila. Hafner, New York & London. Chapter 1, pp. 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G. B. & W. A., Hickey (1967). Genetics of Aedes aegypti. In: J. W., Wright & R., Pal (Eds.), Genetics of insect vectors of disease. Elsevier, Amsterdam, London & New York. Chapter 3, pp. 67–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G. B., W. A., Hickey & R. C., Vandehey (1960). An inherited male-producing factor in Aedes aegypti. Science, N.Y. 132: 1887–1889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G. B., R. C., Vandehey & W. A., Hickey (1961). Genetic variability in populations of Aedes aegypti. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 24: 527–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denell, R. E. & B. H., Judd (1969). Segregation distorter in D. melanogaster males: An effect of female genotype on recovery. Molec. gen. Genetics 105: 262–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, R. J. (1961). A comparison in time of egg hatching between male and female Aedes aegypti (L.). Mosquito News 21: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J. (1963). Cytological study of a case of meiotic drive. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 38: 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J. (1965). Meiotic drive in Drosophila involving chromosome breakage, Genetics, Princeton 51: 555–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausermann, W. & H. F., Nijhout (1975). Permanent loss of male fecundity following sperm depletion in Aedes aegypti (L.). J. med. Entomol. 11: 707–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, W. A. (1970). Factors influencing the distortion of sex ratio in Aedes aegypti. J. Med. Entomol. 7: 727–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, W. A. & G. B., Craig (1966a). Genetic distortion of sex ratio in a mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Genetics, Princeton 53: 1177–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, W. A. & G. B., Craig (1966b). Distortion of sex ratio in populations of Aedes aegypti. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 8: 260–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. R. & B., John (1966). The meiotic consequences of spontaneous chromosome breakage. Chromosoma 18: 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. L. & E. H., Grell (1969). Spermiogenesis without chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, Princeton 61: Supplement 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, W. W. & P. M., Sheppard (1965). Cross-over values in the sex chromosomes of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and evidence of the presence of inversions. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 59: 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G. A. H. (1962). Sex-linkage in Aedes aegypti. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 56: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. T. & K. S., Rai (1970). Correlation of linkage groups with chromosomes in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Genetics, Princeton 66: 475–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGivern, J. J. & K. S., Rai (1972). A radiation-induced paracentric inversion in Aedes aegypti (L.). Cytogenetic and interchromosomal effects. J. Hered. 63: 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGivern, J. J. & K. S., Rai (1974). Sex-ratio distortion and directed alternate segregation of interchange complexes in a mosquito. J. Hered. 65: 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mescher, S. A. L. & K. S., Rai (1966). Spermatogenesis in Aedes aegypti. Mosquito News 26: 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, M. E., D. I., Southern & R. J., Wood (1974). X and Y chromosomes of Aedes aegypti (L.) distinguished by Giemsa C-banding. Chromosoma 49: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, B. (1968). Il controllo genetico della meiosi. Atti Ass. genet. ital. 13: 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novitski, E., W. J., Peacock & J., Engel (1965). Cytological basis of sex ratio in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Science, N.Y. 148: 516–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. J. & J., Erickson (1965). Segregation-distortion and regularly nonfunctional products of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, Princeton 51: 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. J. & G. L. G., Miklos (1973). Meiotic drive in Drosophila: New interpretations of the Segregation distorter and sex chromosome systems. (In E.W. Caspari, Adv. genet., Vol. 17. Academic Press, New York & London, pp. 361–409.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Policansky, D. (1974) “Sex-ratio”, meiotic drive, and group selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 108: 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policansky, D. & J., Ellison (1970). “Sex-ratio” in Drosophila pseudoobscura: spermiogenic failure. Science, N.Y. 169: 888–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, L. & Y., Hiraizumi (1961). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VIII. A heritable aging effect on the phenomenon of Segregation-distortion. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 3: 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, L., Y., Hiraizumi & I., Sandler (1959). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. The cytogenetic basis of Segregation-distortion. Genetics, Princeton 44: 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, L. & E., Novitski (1957). Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am. Nat. 91: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeny, T. L. (1972). Sex ratio distortion caused by meiotic drive in Culex pipiens L. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Tokuyasu, K. T., W. J., Peacock & R. W., Hardy (1972a). Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization process. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat. 124: 479–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokuyasu, K. T., W. J., Peacock & R. W., Hardy (1972b). Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Coiling process. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat. 127: 492–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trippa, G., A.de, Marco, A., Micheli & B., Nicoletti (1974). Recovery of SD chromosomes from Drosophila melanogaster males when heterozygous with structurally different second chromosomes. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 16: 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J. D. (1966). A case of spontaneous chromosome breakage at a specific locus occurring at meoisis. Aust. J. Zool. 14: 1027–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. J. (1962). A preliminary note on sex ratio and hatching-response in eggs of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus).Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 56: 356–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. J. (1975). Lethal genes on the sex chromosomes concealed in a population of the mosquito Aedes aegypti L. Genetica 46: 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. J. (1976). Between-family variation in sex ratio in the Trinidad (T-30) strain of Aedes aegypti (L.) indicating differences in sensitivity to the meiotic drive gene M D. Genetica (in press).

  • Zimmering, S., J. M., Barnabo, J., Femino & G. L., Fowler (1970). Progeny: sperm ratios and Segregation-distorter in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 41: 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmering, S. & G. L., Fowler (1968). Progeny: sperm ratios and non-functional sperm in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 12: 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmering, S., L., Sandler & B., Nicoletti (1970). Mechanisms of meiotic drive. A. Rev. Genet. Vol. 4, 409–436.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newton, M.E., Wood, R.J. & Southern, D.I. A cytogenetic analysis of meiotic drive in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.). Genetica 46, 297–318 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055473

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055473

Keywords

Navigation