Skip to main content
Log in

From genes to phenotype: dynamical systems and evolvability

  • Mini-Review
  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agur, Z. & Kerszberg, M., 1987. The emergence of phenotypic novelties through progressive genetic change. Am. Nat. 129: 862–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., 1982. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes, pp. 313–332 in Development and evolution, edited by J. T.Bonner. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., 1989. The logic of monsters: Evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution. Geobios. mém. spéc. 12: 21–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P. & Gale, E., 1985. A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: Digital reduction in amphibians. Evol. 39: 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J., Alberch, P., Csanyi, V., Dawkins, R. C., Emerson, S. B., Fritzch, B., Horder, T. J., Maynard Smith, J., Starck, M. J., Vrba, E. S., Wagners, S. P. & Wake, D. B., 1989. How do complex organisms evolve? In: Complex organismal functions: Integration and evolution in vertebrates, pp. 403–433. D. B.Wake and G.Roth (eds.). J. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, L. W., 1987. The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, J. M., 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110: 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R., 1985. The evolution of evolvability. In: Proceedings First Los Alamos Conference on Artificial Life. C. Langton (ed.). Los Alamos, CA.

  • Edelman G. M., Expression of cell adhesion molecules during embryogenesis and regulation. Expl. Cell Res. 16: 1–16.

  • Gallin, W. J., Chuong, C. M., Finkel, L. H. & Edelman, G. M., 1986. Antibodies to L-CAM perturb inductive interactions and alter feather pattern and structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 8235–8239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. W. W. Norton & Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. & Provine, W. B., 1980. The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H., 1982. Models of biological pattern formation. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H., 1984. Models for pattern formation during development in higher organisms. In: Pattern formation. G. M.Malacinski and S. V.Bryant (eds.). MacMillan Publ. Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H., 1986. Hierarchical inductions of cell states. A model for segmentation. In: Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. Supp. 4: 357–381.

  • Murray, J. D., 1981. Prepattern formation mechanism for animal coat patterns. J. Theoret. Biol. 88: 161–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M.L. 1988. Heterochrony in evolution. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G. & Alberch, P., 1982. Evolution and bifurcation of development programs. Evol. 36: 444–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G., Shubin, N., Murray, J. D. & Alberch, P., 1988. Evolution and morphogenetic rules: The shape of the vertebrate limb in ontogeny and phylogeny. Evol. 42: 862–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, W. B., 1971. The origins of theoretical population genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, J., 1983. The struggle for authority in the field of heredity, 1900–1932: New perspectives on the rise of genetics. J. History Biol. 16: 311–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. & Lewontin, R. C., 1982. Artifact, cause and genic selection. Phil. Sci. 49: 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M., 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 237: 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, W. C., 1957. The strategy of the genes. Allen and Unwin, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. C., 1980. Reductionist research strategies and their biases in the units of selection controversy. In: Scientific discovery. T.Nickles (ed.). D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L., 1990. The evolution of development. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. (In press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alberch, P. From genes to phenotype: dynamical systems and evolvability. Genetica 84, 5–11 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123979

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123979

Keywords

Navigation