Skip to main content
Log in

High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Transmission and reception of high-frequency sound in the natural environment of bushcrickets (Tettigonia viridissima L.) was studied using the activity of an identified neuron in the insect's auditory pathway as a “biological microphone”. Different positions of the receiver within the habitat were simulated by systematic variation of the distance from a loudspeaker and the height above the ground. Attenuation and filtering properties of the habitat were investigated with pure-tone frequencies between 5 and 40 kHz. Sound attenuation in excess of the attenuation due to geometrical spreading alone increased with increasing frequency, distance between sender and receiver, and decreasing height within the vegetation (Figs. 2–4). The data also confirm the existence of two kinds of excess attenuation. The amount of amplitude fluctuations in the sound signals was investigated by analysing the variability of the neuronal responses at a given receiver position. Variability increased with decreasing bandwidth of a noise signal at some distance from the loadspeaker. The variability in the responses to pure tones increased with both increasing frequency and distance from the source (Fig. 7). In the selected habitat, the temporal pattern of the natural calling song of male T. viridissima was very reliably reflected in the activity of the recorded neuron up to a distance of 30 m at the top of the vegetation, and 15–20 m near ground level (Figs. 5, 8). The maximum hearing distance in response to the calling song was about 40 m. Environmental constraints on long-range acoustic communication in the habitat are discussed in relation to possible adaptations of both the signal structure and the behavior of the insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

excessive attenuation:

EA

sound pressure level:

SPL

References

  • Aylor D (1971) Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J Acoust See Am 51:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey WJ (1985) Acoustic cues for female choice in bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae). In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Paul Parey, Berlin, pp 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey WJ, Yeoh PB (1988) Female phonotaxis and frequency discrimination in the bushcricket Requena verticalis. Physiol Entomol 13:363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet-Clark HC (1970) The mechanism and efficiency of sound production in mole crickets. J Exp Biol 52:619–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH (1985) Insect mating and courtship. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, vol 9. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 591–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadour IR, Bailey WJ (1985) Male agonistic behaviour of the bushcricket Mygalopsis marki Bailey in response to conspecific song (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Z Tierpsychol 70:320–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolan JM, MacNally RC (1981) Spatial dynamics and breeding ecology in the cicada Cystosoma saundersii: the interaction between distributions of resources and intraspecific behaviour. J Anim Ecol 50:925–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner N, Popov AV (1978) Neuroethology of acoustic communication. Adv Insect Physiol 13:229–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): implications for mate choice. Am Zool 22:581–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (1988) Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids (Neoconocephalus): inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity. Anim Behav 36:684–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrisch S (1979) Experimentell-ökologische Freilanduntersuchungen zur Monotopbindung der Laubheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) im Vogelsberg. Beitr Naturk Osthessen 15:33–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR (1971) The importance of atmospheric attenuation for the echolocation of bats (Chiroptera). Anim Behav 19:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuper A, Weidemann S, Kalmring K, Kaminski D (1989) Sound production and sound emission in seven species of European bushcrickets. I. The different parameters of the song; their relation to the morphology of the bushcricket. Bioacoustics 1:31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer W, Lewis DB (1986) Song harmonic content as a parameter determining acoustic orientation behaviour in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus (Le Guillou). J Comp Physiol (A) 158:583–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer W, Sippel M (1987) Acoustic cues for female choice and male competition in Tettigonia cantans. Anim Behav 35:887–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewald J (1985) Freilanduntersuchungen an akustischen Interneuronen der Laubheuschrecke Tettigonia viridissima L. Diploma thesis, Bochum

  • Lewis DB (1983) Directional cues for auditory localization. In: Lewis DB (ed) Bioacoustics: a comparative approach. Academic Press, London, pp 233–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill MJ (1953) On the energy scattered from the interaction of turbulence with sound or shock wave. Proc Cambridge Phil Soc Biol Sci 49:531–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister F-J, Ruhrberg W (1957) Der Einfluß von Grünanlagen auf die Ausbreitung von Gerduschen. Lärmbekämpfung 1:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A (1978) Sound reception in different environments. In: Ali MA (ed) Sensory ecology. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 345–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1983) Strategies for acoustic communication in complex environments. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioural physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 322–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A, Nocke H (1974) Biophysical aspects of sound communication in insects. Adv Insect Physiol 10:247–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 108:17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul RC, Walker TJ (1979) Arboreal singing in a burrowing cricket, Anurogryllus arboreus. J Comp Physiol 132:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy JE, Embleton TFW, Sutherland LC (1977) Review of noise propagation in the atmosphere. J Acoust Soc Am 61:1402–1418

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack GS (1988) Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci 8:2635–2639

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinlaender J, Römer H (1986) Insect hearing in the field. I. The use of identified nerve cells as ‘biological microphones‘. J Comp Physiol (A) 158:647–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römer H (1985) Anatomical representation of frequency and intensity in the auditory system of Orthoptera. In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Paul Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer H, Bailey WJ (1986) Insect hearing in the field. II. Male spacing behaviour and correlated acoustic cues in the bushcricket Mygalopsis marki. J Comp Physiol 159:627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer H, Marquart V, Hardt M (1988) Organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of orthoptera. J Comp Neurol 275:201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer H, Bailey WJ, Dadour I (1989) Insect hearing in the field. III. Masking by noise. J Comp Physiol (A) 164:609–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele DR, Bailey WJ (1981) The function of sound in male spacing behaviour of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). Aust J Ecol 5:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1984) Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. In: Lewis T (ed) Insect communication. Academic Press, London, pp 283–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Quellet H (eds) Acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–181

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: H. Romer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romer, H., Lewald, J. High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29, 437–444 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170174

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170174

Keywords

Navigation