Summary
The ability of subjects to perceive innocuous stimuli in the presence and absence of movement was evaluated using electrical stimulation of the skin. The subjective intensity of suprathreshold stimuli was unchanged during movement. Discrimination of small differences in the intensity of suprathreshold stimuli (difference thresholds) was also not altered by movement while, in the same subjects, detection thresholds were increased during movement of the stimulated arm. These results suggest that the elevation of detection thresholds during movement can be explained by masking. Both active and passive movement of the stimulated limb increased detection thresholds, with active movement having a slightly greater and more consistent effect than passive movement. Thus, both central and peripheral feedback factors appear to play a role in diminishing one's ability to detect weak stimuli during movement. Attention was also shown to influence performance of the detection task.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel RW, Malenka RG (1982) Velocity-dependent suppression of cutaneous sensitivity during movement. Exp Neurol 77: 266–274
Bushnell MC, Duncan GH, Dubner R, Jones RL, Maixner W (1985) Attentional influences on noxious and innocuous cutaneous heat detection in humans and monkeys. J Neurosci 5: 1103–1110
Chapman CE, Rispal-Padel L, Parent MT, Lamarre Y (1984) Gating of lemniscal input at thalamic and cortical levels during conditioned arm movements in the monkey. Abstr Soc Neurosci 10: 735
Coquery JM (1978) Role of active movement in control of afferent input from skin in cat and man. In: Gordon G (ed) Active touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 161–169
Coquery JM, Coulmance M, Leron MC (1972) Modifications des potentiels évoqués corticaux somesthésiques durant des mouvements actifs et passifs chez l'homme. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 33: 269–276
Coquery JM, Malcuit G, Coulmance M (1971) Altérations de la perception d'un stimulus somesthésique durant un mouvement volontaire. C R Soc Biol (Paris) 165: 1946–1951
Coquery JM, Vitton N (1972) Altérations des potentiels évoqués sur le cortex somesthétique du chat durant un movement conditionné. Physiol Behav 8: 963–967
Coulter JD (1974) Sensory transmission through lemniscal pathway during voluntary movement in the cat. J Neurophysiol 37: 831–845
Craig JC (1972) Difference threshold for intensity of tactite stimuli. Percept Psychophys 11: 150–152
Craig JC (1978) Vibrotactile pattern recognition and masking. In: Gordon G (ed) Active touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 229–242
Dyhre-Poulson P (1978) Perception of tactile stimuli before ballistic and during tracking movements. In: Gordon G (ed) Active touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 171–176
Fowler EP (1937) The diagnosis of diseases of the neural mechanism of hearing by the aid of sound well above threshold. Laryngoscope (St Louis) 47: 289–300
Garland HT, Angel RW (1974) Modulation of tactile sensitivity during movement. Neurology (NY) 24: 361
Ghez C, Lenzi GL (1971) Modulation of sensory transmission in cat lemniscal system during voluntary movement. Pflügers Arch 323: 273–278
Ghez C, Pisa M (1972) Inhibition of afferent transmission in cuneate nucleus during voluntary movement in the cat. Brain Res 40: 145–151
Giblin DR (1964) Somatosensory evoked potentials in healthy subjects and in patients with lesions of the nervous system. Ann NY Acad Sci 112: 93–142
Hazemann P, Audin G, Lille F (1975) Effect of voluntary self-paced movements upon auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 39: 247–254
Hulliger M, Nordh E, Thelin A-E, Vallbo AB (1979) The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. J Physiol (Lond) 291: 233–249
Hyvärinen J, Poranen A, Jokinen Y (1980) Influence of attentive behavior on neuronal responses to vibration in primary somatosensory cortex in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 43: 870–882
Lee RG, White DG (1974) Modification of the human somatosensory evoked response during voluntary movement. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 36: 53–62
Lund JP, Bushnell MC, Chapman CE, Duncan GH (1986) The detection of differences between suprathreshold stimuli delivered to the skin is not modified by movement. Proc Int Union Physiol Sci 16: 571
Moody DB, Beecher MD, Stebbins WC (1976) Behavioral methods in auditory research. In: Smith CS, Vernon JA (eds) Handbook of auditory and vestibular research methods. Charles C Thomas, Springfield Ill, pp 439–497
Mountcastle VB, Lynch JC, Georgopoulos A, Sakata H, Acuna C (1975) Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. J Neurophysiol 38: 871–908
Nelson RJ (1984) Responsiveness of monkey primary somatosensory cortical neurons to peripheral stimulation depends on ‘motor-set’. Brain Res 304: 143–148
Papakostopoulos D, Cooper R, Crow HJ (1975) Inhibition of cortical evoked potentials and sensation by self-initiated movement in man. Nature 258: 321–324
Pohlman AG, Kranz FW (1924) Binaural minimum audition in a subject with ranges of deficient acuity. Proc Soc Exp Biol (NY) 21: 335–337
Rushton DN, Rothwell JC, Craggs MD (1981) Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. Brain 104: 465–491
Starr A, Cohen LG (1985) ‘Gating’ of somatosensory evoked potentials begins before the onset of voluntary movement in man. Brain Res 348: 183–186
Tsumoto T, Nakamura S, Iwama K (1975) Pyramidal tract control over cutaneous and kinesthetic sensory transmission in the cat thalamus. Exp Brain Res 22: 281–294
Woodworth RS, Schlosberg H (1954) Experimental psychology. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chapman, C.E., Bushnell, M.C., Miron, D. et al. Sensory perception during movement in man. Exp Brain Res 68, 516–524 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00249795
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00249795