Summary
-
1.
Wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles, hatched from egg masses collected in the field, were reared either with siblings only or in mixed groups of eight sibships. Sibships were marked with vital stains, released in a laboratory test pool, and their spatial distributions recorded over a 4-day period.
-
2.
An analysis of nearest-neighbor distances suggests that tadpoles preferentially associated with familiar siblings over both familiar and unfamiliar non-siblings. Kinship preferences of R. sylvatica tadpoles, unlike those of other anurans that have been tested, thus appear largely unaffected by prior social experience.
-
3.
Tadpoles reared in mixed sibship groups preferentially associated with the siblings with which they were reared over unfamiliar siblings exposed to a different set of sibships. In contrast, tadpoles did not discriminate either between siblings reared in different baskets within the same mixed group tank, or between siblings housed in different singlesibship containers.
-
4.
Because R. sylvatica egg masses are usually deposited in communal clumps, an ability to recognize relatives not dependent on post-embryonic experience may have been selected. The possible adaptive significance of kin association among wood frog tadpoles is unknown; their schools probably do not represent kin groups, but larval distributions in natural ponds might reflect sibling association tendencies.
-
5.
Kin recognition “labels” of non-sibling R. sylvatica tadpoles reared together, like those of R. cascadae tadpoles similarly reared, may converge as a result of social interactions. R. sylvatica tadpoles, unlike R. cascadae tadpoles, retain an ability to discriminate between familiar siblings and familiar non-siblings; hence label transference may be incomplete.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alford RA, Crump ML (1982) Habitat partitioning among size classes of larval southern leopard frogs, Rana utricularia. Copeia 1982:367–373
Blaustein AR, O'Hara RK (1981) Genetic control for sibling recognition? Nature 290:246–248
Breden F, Lum A, Wassersug R (1982) Orientation in aggregates of toad tadpoles Bufo woodhousei. Copeia 1982:672–680
Buckle GR, Greenberg L (1981) Nestmate recognition in sweat bees (Lasioglossum zephyrum): does an individual recognize its own odour or only odours of its nestmates? Anim Behav 29:802–809
Colgan PW (1983) Comparative social recognition. Wiley, New York
Davis LS (1982) Sibling recognition in Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:65–70
DeBenedictis PA (1974) Interspecific competition between tadpoles of Rana pipiens and Rana sylvatica: an experimental field study. Ecol Monogr 44:129–151
Dixon WJ (1981) BMDP statistical software. University of California Press, Berkeley
Formanowicz DR Jr, Brodie ED Jr (1982) Relative palatabilities of members of a larval amphibian community. Copeia 1982:91–97
Getz WM, Smith KB (1983) Genetic kin recognition: honey bees discriminate between full and half sisters. Nature 302:147–148
Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190
Grau HJ (1982) Kin recognition in white-footed deermice (Peromyscus leucopus). Anim Behav 30:497–505
Greenberg L (1979) Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science 206:1095–1097
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I, II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Hassinger DD (1972) Early life history and ecology of three congeneric species of Rana in New Jersey. PhD thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Hölldobler B, Michener CD (1980) Mechanisms of identification and discrimination in social Hymenoptera. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 35–58
Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Am Zool 22:491–517
Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition in animals. Am Sci 71:46–55
Jutsum AR, Saunders TS, Cherrett JM (1979) Intraspecific aggression in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus. Anim Behav 27:839–844
Kareem AM, Barnard CJ (1982) The importance of kinship and familiarity in social interactions between mice. Anim Behav 30:594–601
Keppel G (1973) Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Linsenmair KE (1972) Die Bedeutung familienspezifischer “Abzeichen” für den Familienzusammenhalt bei der sozialen Wüstenassel Hemilepistus reaumuri Audouin u. Savigny (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscoidea). Z Tierpsychol 31:131–162
Martof BS (1970) Rana sylvatica. Cat Am Amphib Reptiles 86:1–4
O'Hara RK (1981) Habitat selection behavior in three species of anuran larvae: environmental cues, ontogeny, and adaptive significance. PhD thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis
O'Hara RK, Blaustein AR (1981) An investigation of sibling recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles. Anim Behav 29:1121–1126
O'Hara RK, Blaustein AR (1982) Kin preference behavior in Bufo boreas tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:43–49
Porter RH, Tepper VJ, White DM (1981) Experiential influences on the development of huddling preferences and “sibling” recognition in spiny mice. Dev Psychobiol 14:375–382
Seale DS (1982) Physical factors influencing oviposition by the woodfrog, Rana sylvatica, in Pennsylvania. copeia 1982:627–635
Shaw E (1970) Schooling in fishes: critique and review. In: Aronson LR, Tobach E, Lehrman DS, Rosenblatt JS (eds) Development and evolution of behavior. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 452–480
Steinwascher K (1978) Interference and exploitation competition among tadpoles of Rana utricularia. Ecology 59:1039–1046
Sype WE (1975) Breeding habits, embryonic thermal requirements and embryonic and larval development of the Cascade frog, Rana cascadae Slater. PhD thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis
Waldman B (1981) Sibling recognition in toad tadpoles: the role of experience. Z Tierpsychol 56:341–358
Waldman B (1982a) Adaptive significance of communal oviposition in wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:169–174
Waldman B (1982b) Sibling association among schooling toad tadpoles: field evidence and implications. Anim Behav 30:700–713
Waldman B (1983) Kin recognition and sibling association in anuran amphibian larvae. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Waldman B (in press) Sibling recognition in toad tadpoles: are kinship labels transferred among conspecifics? Z Tierpsychol
Waldman B, Adler K (1979) Toad tadpoles associate preferentially with siblings. Nature 282:611–613
Walters B (1975) Studies of interspecific predation within an amphibian community. J Herpetol 9:267–279
Wassersug RJ (1973) Aspects of social behavior in anuran larvae. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 273–297
Wilbur HM (1972) Competition, predation, and the structure of the Ambystoma-Rana sylvatica community. Ecology 53:3–21
Wilbur HM (1976) Density-dependent aspects of metamorphosis in ambystoma and Rana sylvatica. Ecology 57:1289–1296
Wilbur HM (1977) Interactions of food level and population density in Rana sylvatica. Ecology 58:206–209
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Wu HMH, Holmes WG, Medina SR, Sackett GP (1980) Kin preference in infant Macaca nemestrina. Nature 285:225–227
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waldman, B. Kin recognition and sibling association among wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14, 171–180 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299616
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299616