Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Foraging strategies ofDrosophila melanogaster: A chromosomal analysis

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two larval foraging strategies inDrosophila melanogaster were identified, “rover” and “sitter.” “Rovers” traverse a large area while feeding whereas “sitters” cover a small area. The difference between “rovers” and “sitters” was analyzed genetically by chromosomal substitutions between isogenic stocks. Differences in larval locomotor behavior (“crawling behavior”) can be attributed to the second chromosome, the “rover” strategy being dominant over the “sitter” strategy. Differences in feeding rate (“shoveling behavior”) are affected additively by both the second and third chromosomes. Natural populations ofDrosophila larvae were sampled three times over a 2-month period; “rovers” and “sitters” were at constant frequencies in these populations. The two foraging strategies are discussed in the light of resource utilization in environments where food is distributed continuously or discontinuously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala, F. J. (1970). Competition, coexistence and evolution. In Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C. (eds.),Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honour of Theodosius Dobzansky, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 121–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (1961). An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae ofDrosophila melanogaster.Arch. Neer. Zool. 14:200–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (1969). Selection for rate of growth and its influence on competitive ability ofDrosophila melanogaster.Neth. J. Zool. 19:541–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, B., Connolly, K., and Mallinson, M. (1974). Activity and sexual behavior of neurological mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 4:227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, B., Sewell, D., and Bos, M. (1977). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines.Genet. Res. Camb. 30:149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, K. (1966). Locomotor activity inDrosophila. II. Selection for active and inactive strains.Anim. Behav. 14:444–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerec, M. (ed.) (1950).Biology of Drosophila, Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyama, D. J. (1970). Variation in genetic response to interspecific competition in laboratory populations ofDrosophila, Am. Nat. 104:239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibo, D. L. (1972). A stabilizing interaction between the founder effect and interdeme mixing in competing populations ofDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Can. J. Zool. 50:325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy-Herrera, R. (1977). Inter- and intra-populational variation in digging inDrosophila melanogaster larvae.Behav. Genet. 7:433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P. H. (1972). Factors responsible for a change in competitive ability inDrosophila.Evolution 26:513–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. C., and Grell, E. H. (1967).Genetic Variations of Drosophila Melanogaster, Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 627, Washington, D.C.

  • Miller, R. S. (1964a). Interspecies competition in laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Am. Nat. 98:221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S. (1964b). Larval competition inDrosophila melanogaster, andDrosophila simulans.Ecology 45:132–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J., and Oster, I. I. (1963). Some mutational techniques inDrosophila. In Burdette, W. J. (ed.),Methodology in Basic Genetics, Holden-Day, San Francisco, pp. 249–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, S. (1979). Relationship between larval feeding behavior and viability inDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Behav. Genet. 9:129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1975). The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling species,Drosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Q. Rev. Biol. 50:151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1977). Genes, behavior, and evolutionary processes: The genusDrosophila.Adv. Genet. 19:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1978). Habitat selection and evolutionary strategies inDrosophila: An invited address,Behav. Genet. 8:511–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, E., and Sing, C. F. (1971). The genetic basis of a specific phenocopy response.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 13:822–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, D., Burnet, B., and Connolly, K. (1975). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Genet. Res. Camb. 24:163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, D. F., Hunt, D. M., and Burnet, B. (1975). Biogenic amines inDrosophila melanogaster selected for differences in larval feeding behavior.Behav. Biol. 15:213–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, M5S 1A1, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Marla B. Sokolowski

Authors
  1. Marla B. Sokolowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sokolowski, M.B. Foraging strategies ofDrosophila melanogaster: A chromosomal analysis. Behav Genet 10, 291–302 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067774

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067774

Key Words

Search

Navigation