Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex determining mechanisms: An evolutionary perspective

  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Theories on the evolution of sex determining mechanisms are reviewed for male and female heterogamety, environmental sex determination, and briefly, haplo-diploidy and hermaphroditism. Because of their discrete and well-defined nature, sex determining mechanisms lend themselves to three types of evolutionary questions:what variety occurs and might be expected but does not occur,how do changes occur from one mechanism to another, andwhy do certain changes occur? All three approaches were illustrated for these different sex determining mechanisms. A generality emerging from these studies is that, at the level of selection on the sex ratio, there are no intrinsic problems in evolving from one sex determining mechanism to another: straightforward transitions between different mechanisms exist under various conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aida T., Sex reversal inAplocheilus latipes and a new explanation of sex differentiation. Genetica21 (1936) 136–153.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avtalion, R.R., and Hammerman, I.S., Sex determination inSarotherodon (Tilapia) I. Introduction to a theory of autosomal influence. Bamidgeh30 (1978) 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bacci, G., Sex Determination, Pergamon Press, Oxford 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, B.S., and Ridge, K.A., Sex and the single cell. I. On the action of major loci affecting sex determination inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics94 (1980) 383–423.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baltzer, F., Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte vonBonellia. Verh. dt. zool. Ges.22 (1912) 252–261. (Cited from Leutert43).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beermann, W., Geschlechtsbestimmung und Evolution der genetischen Y-Chromosomen beiChironomus. Biol. Zbl.74 (1955) 525–544.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, G., The Masterpiece of Nature. The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. University of California Press, Los Angeles 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bridges, C.B., Non-disjunction as proof of the chromosome theory of heredity. Genetics1 (1916) 1–52, 107–163.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bridges, C.B., Sex in relation to genes and chromosomes. Am. Nat.59 (1925) 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bull, J.J., An advantage for the evolution of male halploidy and systems with similar genetic transmission. Heredity43 (1979) 361–381.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bull, J.J., Sex determination in reptiles. Q. Rev. Biol.55 (1980) 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bull, J.J., Sex ratio evolution when fitness varies. Heredity46 (1981) 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bull, J.J., Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Benjamin/Cummings, California 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bull, J.J., and Charnov, E.L., Changes in the heterogametic mechanism of sex determination. Heredity39 (1977) 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bulmer, M.G., and Bull, J.J., Models of polygenic sex determination and sex ratio evolution. Evolution36 (1982) 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bulnheim, H.-P., Interaction between genetic, external and parasitic factors in sex determination of the crustacean amphipodGammarus duebeni. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.31 (1978) 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caullery, M., and Comas, M., Le déterminisme du sexe chez un nématode (Paramermis contorta), parasite des larves desChironomus. C.r. Acad. Sci. Paris186 (1928) 646–648.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Charlesworth, D., and Charlesworth, B., Sex differences in fitness and selection for contric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Genet. Res.35 (1980) 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Charnier, M., Action de la température sur la sex-ratio chez l'embryon d'Agama agama (Agamidae, Lacertilien) Soc. biol. Ouestt Afr.160 (1966) 620–622.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Charnov, E.L., The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Charnov, E.L., and Bull, J.J., When is sex environmentally determined? Nature266 (1977) 828–830.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Christie, J.R., Some observations on sex in the Mermithidae. J. exp. Zool.53 (1929) 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cline, T.W., A male-specific lethal mutation inDrosophila melanogaster that transforms sex. Devl Biol.72 (1979) 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Conover, D.O., Adaptive significance of temperature-dependent sex determination in a fish. Am. Nat.123 (1983) 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Conover, D.O., and Kynard, B.E., Environmental sex determination: Interaction of temperature and genotype in a fish. Science213 (1981) 577–579.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cotterman, C.W., Regular two-allele and three-allele phenotype systems. Am. J. hum. Genet.5 (1953) 193–235.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Craig, G.B., Genetic control of thermally-induced sex reversal inAedes aegypti, in: Proc. XIIth Int. Congr. of Ent., Lond. p. 263. Ed. P. Freeman. R. ent. Soc., London 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crew, F.A.E. Sex Determination. 4th Edn. Methuen & Co. Ltd. Reprinted: Dover, New York 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crozier, R.H., Evolutionary genetics of the Hymenoptera. A. Rev. Ent.22 (1977) 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dournon, C., and Houllion, C., Déterminisme génétique du sexe: démonstration à partir d'animaux à phenotype sexuel inverse sous l'action de la tempèrature chez l'Amphibian UrodelePleurodeles waltlii Michah. C.r. Acad. Sci. Paris296 (1983) 770–782.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Eicher, E.M., Primary sex determining genes in mice: a brief review, in: Prospects for sexing mammalian sperm, pp. 121–135. Eds. R.P. Amann and G.E. Seidel. Colorado Associated Univ. Press, Colorado 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fisher, R.A., The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Dover Reprint (1958), New York 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fredga, K., Gropp, A., Winking, H., and Frank, F., A hypothesis explaning the exceptional sex ratio in the wood lemming (Myopus schisticolor). Hereditas85 (1977) 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gileva, E.A., Chromosomal diversity and an aberrant genetic system of sex determination in the Arctic lemming,Dicrostonyx torquatus Pallas (1779). Genetica52/53 (1980) 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gutzke, W.H.N., and Paukstis, G.L., Influence of the hydric environment on sexual differentiation of turtles. J. exp. Zool.226 (1983) 467–469.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hartl, D.L., and Brown, S.W., The origin of male haploid genetic systems and their expected sex ratio. Theor Pop. Biol.1 (1970) 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hiroyoshi, T., Sex limited inheritance and abnormal sex ratio in strains of the bousefly. Genetics50 (1964) 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hodgkin, J., More sex determination mutants ofCaenorhabditis elegans. Genetics96 (1980) 649–664.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kallmann, K.D., Evidence for the existence of transformer genes for sex in the teleostXiphophorus maculatus. Genetics60 (1968) 811–828.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kallman, K.D., A new look at sex determination in poecillid fishes, in: Evolutionary genetics of fishes, pp. 95–171. Ed. B.J. Turner. Plenum Publ. Corp. New York 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kerr, R.W., Inheritance of DDT resistance in a laboratory colony of the housefly,Musca domestica. Aust. J. biol. Sci.23 (1970) 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  42. King, M., The evolution of sex chromosomes in lizards, in: Evolution and Reproduction, pp. 55–60. Eds J. Calaby and H. Tyndale-Briscoe. Aust. Acad. Sci., Canberra 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Leutert, R., Sex detemination inBonellia, in: Intersexuality in the Animal Kingdom, pp. 84–90. Ed. R. Rienboth. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lloyd, D.G., Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity32 (1974) 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Martin, J., Kuvangkadilok, C., Peart, D.H., and Lee, B.T.O., Multiple sex determining regions in a group of relatedChironomus species (Diptera: Chironomidae). Heredity44 (1980) 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  46. McDonald, I.C., Evenson, P., Nickel, C.A., and Johnson, O.A., House fly genetics: Isolation of a female determining factor on chromosome 4. Ann. ent. Soc.71 (1978) 692–694.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Milani, R., The house fly,Musca domestica, in: Handbook of genetics, vol. 3: Invertebrates of genetic interest, pp. 377–399. Ed. R.C. King. Plenum Press, New York 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mittwoch, U., Sex chromosomes. Academic Press, New York 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mittwoch, U., Genetics of sex differentiation. Academic Press, New York 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mrosovsky, N., Thermal biology of sea turtles. Am. Zool.20 (1980) 531–547.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nakamura, D., Wachtel, S.S., and Kallman, K., H-Y antigen and the evolution of heterogamety. J. Hered.75 (1984) 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ohno, S., Sex Chromosomes and Sex-Linked Genes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ohno, S., Major Sex-Determining Genes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Oliver, J.H. Jr, Parthenogenesis in mites and ticks. Am. Zool.11 (1971) 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Oliver, J.H. Jr, Cytogenetics of mites and ticks. A. Rev. Ent.22 (1977) 407–429.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Orzack, S.H., Sohn, J.J., Kallman, K.D., Levin, S.A., and Johnston, R., Maintenance of the three sex chromosome polymorphism in the platyfish,Xiphophorus maculatus. Evolution34 (1980) 663–672.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Packard, G.C., Packard, M.J., Boardman, T.J., and Ashen, M.D., Possible adaptive value of water exchanges in flexible-shelled eggs of turtles. Science213 (1981) 471–473.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Petersen, J.J., Effects of host size and parasite burden on sex ratio in the mosquito parasiteOctomymermis muspratti. J. Nemat.9 (1977) 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pieau, C., Sur la proportion sexuelle chez les embryons de deux Cheloniens (Testudo graeca L. etEmys orbicularis L.) issus d'œufs incubes artificiellemnt. C.r. Acad. Sci. Paris (D)272 (1971) 3071–3074.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pieau, C., Effects de la température sur le développement des glandes génitales chez les embryons de deux Cheloniens,Emys orbicularis L. etTestudo graeca L. C.r. Acad. Sci. Paris (D)274 (1972) 719–722.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pieau, C., Sur la différenciation sexuelle chez des embryons d'Emys orbicularis L. (Chelonien) issues d'œufs incubés dans le sol au cours de l'été 1973. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr.99 (1974) 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Pieau, C., Temperature and sex differentiation in embryos of two chelonians,Emys orbicularis L. andTestudo graca, L., in: Intersexuality in the Animal Kingdom, pp. 332–339. Ed. R. Reinboth. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Pieau, C., Effects des variations thermiques sur la différentiation du sexe chez les vertébrés. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr.100 (1975b) 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Pieau, C., Modalities of the action of temperature on sexual differentiation in field-developing embryos of the European pond turtleEmys orbicularis (Emydidae). J. exp. Zool.220 (1982) 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Richards, C.M., and Nace, G.W., Gynogenetic and hormonal sex reversal used in the tests of the XX-XY hypothesis of sex determination inRana pipiens. Growth42 (1978) 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rubin, D.A., Effect of pH on sex ratio in cichlids and poecillids (Teleostei) Copeia (1985) 233–235.

  67. Rubini, P.G., Franco, M.G., and Vanossi Este, S., Polymorphisms for heterochromosomes and autosomal sex-determinants inMusca domestica L. Atti. IX Congr. ital. Ent.1972 342–352.

  68. Schmid, M., Evolution of sex chromomes and heterogametic systems in Amphibia. Differentiation23S (1983) S13-S22.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Schrader, F., and Hughes-Schrader, S., Haploidy in metazoa. Q. Rev. Biol.6 (1931) 411–438.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Scudo, F.M., Sex population genetics. Ricerca scient.34 II-B (1964) 93–146.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Scudo, F.M., Criteria for the analysis of multifactorial sex determination. Monitore zool. ital.1 (1967) 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Thompson, P.E., and Bowen, I.S., Interactions of differentiated primary sex factors inChironomus tentans. Genetics70 (1972) 491–493.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Trivers, R.L., and Willard, D.E., Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science179 (1973) 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Vogt, R.C., and Bull, J.J., Ecology of hatchling sex ratio in map turtles. Ecology65 (1984) 582–587.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wachtel, S.S., H-Y antigen and the biology of sex determination. Grune and Stratton, New York 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Westergaard, M., The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Adv. Genet.9 (1958) 217–281.

    Google Scholar 

  77. White, M.J.D., Animal Cytology and Evolution, 3rd Edn. Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridtge 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Whiting, P.W., The evolution of male haploidy. Q. Rev. Biol.20 (1945) 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Yntema, C.L., Effects of incubation temperatures on sexual differentiation in the turtle,Chelydra serpentina. J. Morph.150 (1976) 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Zoology, University of Texas, 78712, Austin, Texas, USA

    J. J. Bull

Authors
  1. J. J. Bull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bull, J.J. Sex determining mechanisms: An evolutionary perspective. Experientia 41, 1285–1296 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01952071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01952071

Key words

Search

Navigation