Skip to main content
Log in

Order of play in strategically equivalent games in extensive form

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Can we find a pair of extensive form games that give rise to the same strategic form game such that, when played by a reasonable subject population, there is a statistically significant difference in how the games are played?” (Kreps, 1990, p. 112). And if yes, “can we organize these significant differences according to some principles that reflect recognizable differences in the extensive forms?” Both questions are answered positively by reporting results from three different experiments on public goods provision, resource dilemmas, and pure coordination games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Budescu DV, Rapoport A, Suleiman R (1990). Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric players. European Journal of Social Psychology 20:475–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Budescu DV, Rapoport A, Suleiman R (1992) Simultaneous vs. sequential requests in resource dilemmas with incomplete information. Acta Psychologica 80: 297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Budescu DV, Suleiman R, Rapoport A (in press) Positional order effects in social dilemmas games with uncertain resources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 61: 225–238

  • Cooper R, De Jong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1990) Selection criteria in coordination games: Some experimental results. American Economic Review 80: 218–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford VP (1991) An “evolutionary” interpretation of Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil's experimental results on coordination. Games and Economic Behavior 3: 25–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Erev I, Rapoport A (1990) Provision of step-level public goods: The sequential contribution mechanism. Journal of Conflict Resolution 34: 401–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW, Hirshleifer J (1989) An experimental evaluation of the weakest link/best shot model of public goods. Journal of Political Economics 92: 201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, McCabe K, Schachat K, Smith V (in press) Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior

  • Kohlberg E, Mertens J-F (1986) On the strategic stability of equilibrium. Econometrica 54: 1003–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps DM (1990) Game theory and economic modelling. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD (1992) Rational versus plausible accounting equivalences in preference judgments. In Edwards W (Ed.): Utility theories: Measurements and applications. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston: 187–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Page EB (1963) Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: A significance test for linear ranks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 216–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A (1985) Provision of public goods and the MCS experimental paradigm. American Political Science Review 79: 149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A (1987) Research paradigms and expected utility models for the provision of step-level public goods. Psychological Review 94: 74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A, Budescu DV, Suleiman R (1993) Sequential requests from randomly distributed shared resources. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 37: 241–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A, Budescu DV, Suleiman R, Weg E (1992) Social dilemmas with uniformly distributed resources. In Liebrand WBG, Messick DM, Wilke HAM (Eds.): A social psychological approach to social dilemmas. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY: 43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A, Erev I (in press). Provision of step level public goods: Effects of different information structures. In Schulz U, Albers W, and Mueller U (Eds.): Social dilemmas and cooperation. Springer-Verlag New York

  • Rapoport A, Suleiman R (1992) Equilibrium solutions for resource dilemmas. Group Decision and Negotiation 1: 269–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. In Kagel J, Roth AE (Eds.): Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T (1978) Micromotives and macrobehavior. Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter A, Weigelt K, Wilson C (1991) A laboratory investigation of multi-person rationality and presentation effects. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, New York University

  • Suleiman R, Rapoport A (1988) Environmental and social uncertainty in single-trial social dilemmas. Acta Psychologica 68: 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kragt AJC, Orbell JM, Dawes RM (1983) The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems. American Political Science Review 77: 112–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck, JB, Battalio RC, Beil RD (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. American Economic Review 80: 234–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RD (1991) Strategic uncertainty, equilibrium selection, and coordination failure in average opinion games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 885–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, (2nd Ed.) Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapoport, A. Order of play in strategically equivalent games in extensive form. Int J Game Theory 26, 113–136 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01262516

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01262516

Keywords

Navigation