Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian model unifies multisensory spatial localization with the physiological properties of the superior colliculus

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Multisensory integration” refers to the phenomenon by which information from different senses is integrated in order to interpret and guide responses to external events. Here, we advance two specific hypotheses: (1) the process of multisensory integration in spatial localization is statistically optimal, and (2) the optimality of the processes guiding this localization results from the implementation of Bayes’ rule. We explicitly test the predictions of an optimal (Bayesian) model for the behavior of animals trained and tested in a spatial localization task, and find that the model correctly predicts behavioral patterns which are at times counterintuitive. The model also predicts the receptive field properties of superior colliculus neurons that are involved in these behaviors, and sheds new light on the computational responsibilities different circuits have in effecting these behaviors. Thus, the Bayesian model appears to represent not only a yardstick for the optimality of a behavior, but also a descriptor of the underlying neural processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventroliquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14:257–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasio TJ, Patton PE (2004) Analysis and modeling of multisenosry enhancement in the deep superior colliculus. In: Calvert GA, Spence C, Stein BE (eds) The handbook of multisensory processes, Bradford Books/MIT, Cambridge, pp 265–284

  • Anastasio TJ, Patton PE, Belkacem-Boussaid K (2000) Using Bayes’ rule to model multisensory enhancement in the superior colliculus. Neural Comput 12:1165–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia PWJRA, Aslin RN (2003) Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J Opt Soc Am A 20(7):1391–1397

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierholm UR, Quartz SR, Shams L (2005) Bayesian inference as a unifying model of auditory–visual integration and segregation. Program No. 283.13, Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC (Online)

  • Casagrande VA, Harting JK, Hall WC, Diamond IT, Martin GF (1972) Superior colliculus of the tree shrew. A structural and functional subdivision into superficial and deep layers. Science 177:444–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colonius H, Diederich A (2004) Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: a time-window-of-integration model. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1000–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corneil BD, Munoz DP (1996) The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts. J Neurosci 16:8193–8207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frassinetti F, Bolognini N, Ladavas E (2002) Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Exp Brain Res 147:332–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frens MA, Van Opstal AJ, Van der Willigen RF (1995) Spatial and temporal factors determine auditory–visual interactions in human saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57:802–816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LR (1980) The superior colliculus and movements of the head and eyes in cats. J Physiol (Lond) 300:367–391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner RS, Heffner HE (1988) Sound localization acuity in the cat: effect of azimuth, signal duration, and test procedure. Hear Res 36:221–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes HC, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Nozawa G, Fendrich R (1994) Visual–auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing: saccades versus manual responses. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:131–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Jiang H, Stein BE (2002) Two corticotectal areas facilitate multisensory orientation behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1240–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kadunce DC, Vaughan JW, Wallace MT, Benedek G, Stein BE (1997) Mechanisms of within- and cross-modality suppression in the superior colliculus2. J Neurophysiol 78:2834–2847

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadunce DC, Vaughan JW, Wallace MT, Stein BE (2001) The influence of visual and auditory receptive field organization on multisensory integration in the superior colliculus1. Exp Brain Res 139:303–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27:712–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May BJ, Huang AY (1996) Sound orientation behavior in cats. I. Localization of broadband noise. J Acoust Soc Am 100:1059–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith MA, Stein BE (1983) Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science 221:389–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith MA, Stein BE (1986) Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol 56:640–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith MA, Stein BE (1996) Spatial determinants of multisensory integration in cat superior colliculus neurons. J Neurophysiol 75:1843–1857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Middlebrooks JC (1987) Binaural mechanisms of spatial tuning in the cat’s superior colliculus distinguished using monaural occlusion. J Neurophysiol 57:688–701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Middlebrooks JC, Knudsen EI (1984) A neural code for auditory space in the cat’s superior colliculus. J Neurosci 4:2621–2634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavani F, Ladavas E, Driver J (2003) Auditory and multisensory aspects of visuospatial neglect. Trends Cogn Sci 7:407–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschecker JP, Kniepert U (1994) Auditory localization behaviour in visually deprived cats. Eur J Neurosci 6:149–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider GE (1969) Two visual systems: brain mechanisms for localization and discrimination are dissociated by tectal and cortical lesions. Science 163:895–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (1986) Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye movements: role of primate superior colliculus. Physiol Rev 66:118–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague JM (1965) The role of the superior colliculus in visually guided behavior42. Exp Neurol 11:115–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Meredith MA, Huneycutt WS, McDade L (1989) Behavioral indices of multisensory integration: orientation to visual cues is affected by auditory stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 1:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz RH, Albano JE (1980) Two visual systems: brain mechanisms for localization and discrimination are dissociated by tectal and cortical lesions. Annu Rev Neurosci 3:189–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Rowland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowland, B., Stanford, T. & Stein, B. A Bayesian model unifies multisensory spatial localization with the physiological properties of the superior colliculus. Exp Brain Res 180, 153–161 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0847-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0847-2

Keywords

Navigation