Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Bw4/Bw6 difference between HLA-B*0802 and HLA-B*0801 changes the peptides endogenously bound and the stimulation of alloreactive T cells

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Immunogenetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 HLA-B*0801 is unique among HLA-B allotypes in having dominant amino acid anchors at positions 3 and 5 of the peptide-binding motif. HLA-B*0802 is a variant of HLA-B*0801 in which the Bw6 sequence motif is replaced by a Bw4 sequence motif. This change, involving substitutions at positions 77, 80, 81, 82, and 83 of the B*08 heavy chain, is probably the result of a single evolutionary event of interallelic conversion. Moreover, the difference between B*0802 and B*0801 is sufficient to stimulate a cytotoxic T-cell response. To assess further the functional impact of the Bw4 motif on a B8 background, we compared the peptide-binding specificity of the B*0801 and B*0802 allotypes by sequencing the mixture of peptides endogenously bound to B*0802 and 12 individual peptides purified from that mixture. The HLA-B*0802 allotype, while able to bind some peptides bound by B*0801, has a broader repertoire of endogenously bound peptides than B*0801: the peptides bound by B*0802 are more variable in length and exhibit greater diversity in the carboxyl-terminal amino acid which interacts with the F pocket.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 29 October 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnett, K., Huang, W., Valiante, N. et al. The Bw4/Bw6 difference between HLA-B*0802 and HLA-B*0801 changes the peptides endogenously bound and the stimulation of alloreactive T cells. Immunogenetics 48, 56–61 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002510050400

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002510050400

Navigation