Skip to main content
Log in

Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners?

  • Review
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In insects, large ejaculate and associated materials, including spermatophores, appear to have evolved via sexual selection acting on males to either delay female remating or to increase the rate of egg-laying. It is also possible, however, that females use nutrients transferred during mating to increase their lifetime fecundity. If so, male ejaculate size may also have evolved under natural selection as a form of paternal investment. In Lepidoptera, males with a greater number of prior matings tend to produce smaller spermatophores. However, the reported effects of male mating history on female fecundity vary widely among species. We therefore performed a meta-analysis using data from 29 studies of 25 species. Overall, the reproductive output of females mated to virgin males was significantly higher than that of females mated to sexually experienced males (Hedges’ d=0.33, P<0.01). A sample size of around 145 females per male mating type is required to detect an effect of this size with 80% statistical power at α=0.05 (two-tailed). There was no difference in mean effect size between butterflies/skippers and moths. After controlling for any effect of taxonomic group, however, the mean effect size for polyandrous species was significantly greater than that for monandrous species (Hedges’ d=0.45 vs 0.25, P=0.01). We then discuss possible reasons why male mating history, presumably acting through its effect on spermatophore size, might have a stronger effect in polyandrous than monandrous species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett AC, Lewis LJ (1985) Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): reproduction and sperm use by wild-type and mutant moths. Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:559–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström J, Wiklund C (2002) Effects of size and nuptial gifts on butterfly reproduction: can females compensate for a smaller size through male-derived nutrients? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissoondath CJ, Wiklund C (1996) Male butterfly investment in successive ejaculates in relation to mating system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL (1990) A general model of the role of male-donated nutrients in female insects’ reproduction. Am Nat 136:598–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL (1995) Male nuptial gifts: phenotypic consequences and evolutionary implications. In: Leather SR, Hardie J (eds) Insect reproduction. CRC, Boca Ratón, pp 215–242

  • Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206:83–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower JH (1975) Plodia interpunctella: effect of sex ratio on reproductivity. Ann Entomol Soc Am 68:846–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan PS, Chapin JB (1960) Morphology of the reproductive system and mating in two representative members of the family Noctuidae, Pseudaletia unipuncta and Peridroma margaritosa with comparison to Heliothis zea. Ann Entomol Soc Am 53:763–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A (1994) Interactions between body size and mating history influence the reproductive success of males of a tortricid moth, Zeiraphera canadiensis. Can J Zool 72:2124–2132

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey

  • Cook PA (1999) Sperms numbers and female fertility in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera; Pyralidae). J Insect Behav 12:767–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PA, Wedell N (1996) Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success? Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1047–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook PA, Wedell N (1999) Non-fertile sperm delay female remating. Nature 397:486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper H, Hedges LV (1994) Handbook of research synthesis. Rusell Sage Foundation, New York

  • Cordero C (1995) Ejaculate substances that affects female insect reproductive physiology and behavior: honest or arbitrary traits? J Theor Biol 174:453–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danthanarayana W, Gu H (1991) Multiple mating and its effect on the reproductive success of female Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Ecol Entomol 16:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash AK, Mishra CSK, Nayak BK, Dash MC (1993) Effect of mating duration on oviposition rate and hatchability of the indian tasar silk moth Antheraea mylitta (Saturniidae) in different seasons. J Res Lepid 32:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle J, Bouchard A (1995) Male larval nutrition in Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): an important factor in reproductive success. Oecologia 104:508–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvall S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadamiro HY, Baker TC (1999) Reproductive performance and longevity of female European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis: effects of multiple mating, delay in mating, and adult feeding. J Insect Physiol 45:385–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick SM, McNeil JN (1989) Lifetime mating potential and reproductive success in males of the true armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Funct Ecol 3:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster SP, Ayers RH (1996) Multiple mating and its effects in the lightbrown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker). J Insect Physiol 42:657–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG (1994) Associations between body size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohari H, Hawlitzky N (1986) Activité reproductrice de la pyrale du mäis, Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. (Lep. Pyralidae) à basses températures constantes. Agronomie 6:911–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham HM, Glick PA, Ouye MT, Martin DF (1965) Mating frequency of female pink bollworms collected from light traps. Ann Entomol Soc Am 58:595–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (1982) The question of paternal investment in lepidoptera: male-contributed proteins in Plodia interpunctella. Int J Invertebr Reprod 5:323–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic, New York

  • Henneberry TJ, Clayton TE (1983) Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): comparative mating frequencies of laboratory-reared and native moths. Ann Entomol Soc Am 76:925–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneberry TJ, Leal MP (1979) Pink bollworm: effect of temperature, photoperiod and light intensity, moth age, and mating frequency on oviposition and egg viability. J Econ Entomol 72:489–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiroki M, Obara Y (1997) Delayed mating and its cost to female reproduction in the butterfly Eurema hecabe. J Ethol 15:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou ML, Sheng CF (1999) Fecundity and longevity of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): effects of multiple mating. J Econ Entomol 92:569–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L, Siew-Woon B, Wagner D, Pierce NE (2000) Effects of mating history on ejaculate size, fecundity, longevity, and copulation duration in the ant-tended lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Møller AP (2003) A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behaviour. Behav Ecol 14:438–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson B (1996) Male reproductive reserves in relation to mating system in butterflies: a comparative study. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:187–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson B (1998) Nuptial gifts, resource budgets, and reproductive output in a polyandrous butterfly. Ecology 79:2931–2940

    Google Scholar 

  • LaChance LE, Proshold FI, Ruud RL (1978) Pink bollworm: effects of male irradiation and ejaculate sequence on female ovipositional response and sperm radiosensivity. J Econ Entomol 71:361–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederhouse RC, Scriber JM (1987) Ecological significance of a postmating decline in egg viability in the tiger swallowtail. J Lepid Soc 41:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederhouse RC, Ayres MP, Scriber JM (1990) Adult nutrition affects male virility in Papilio glaucus. Funct Ecol 4:743–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukefahr MJ, Griffin JA (1957) Mating and oviposition habits of the pink bollworm moth. J Econ Entomol 50:487–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall LD, McNeil JN (1989) Spermatophore mass as an estimate of male nutrient investment: a closer look in Pseudaletia unipuncta Haworth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Funct Ecol 3:605–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol Evol 16:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow EH, Gage MJG (2000) The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:307–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser KS (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osorio-Osorio R, Cibrián-Tovar J (2000) Reproductive behavior of sugarcane borer Diatraea considerata Heinrich (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Agrociencia 34:595–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram I (1971) Aspects of mating in the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can Entomol 103:1121–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouye MT, Graham HM, Richmond CA, Martin DF (1964) Mating studies of the pink bollworm. J Econ Entomol 57:222–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivnick KA, McNeil JN (1987) Puddling in butterflies: sodium affects reproductive success in Thymelicus lineola. Physiol Entomol 12:461–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi Kumar G, Rajeshwary H, Ojha NG, Thangavelu K (1995) Effect of multiple mating on fecundity and fertility in the tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Entomon 20:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1988) Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol Rev 63:509–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (2000) MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis. Version 2.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass

  • Royer L, McNeil JN (1993) Male investment in the european corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): impact on female longevity and reproductive performance. Funct Ecol 7:209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL, Gilchrist GW (1986) Copulation in Colias eurytheme (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): patterns and frequency. J Zool 209:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL, Gilchrist GW, Terkanian B (1987) Female butterflies mated with recently mated males show reduced reproductive output. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:319–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryne C, Zhu JW, Van Dongen S, Löfstedt C (2001) Spermatophore size and multiple mating: effects on reproductive success and post-mating behaviour in the indian meal moth. Behaviour 138:947–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadek MM (2001) Polyandry in field-collected Spodoptera littoralis moths and laboratory assessment of the effects of male mating history. Entomol Exp Appl 98:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Simmons LW, Parker GA (1989) Nuptial feeding in insects: mating effort versus parental investment. Ethology 81:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockel J (1973a) Variation du pouvoir reproducteur des mâles de Sitotroga cerealella Oliv. en liaison avec le rang d’émission et le volume des spermatophores. Bull Soc Entomol Fr 78:178–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockel J (1973b) Influence des relations sexuelles et du milieu trophique de l’adulte sur la reproduction de Sitotroga cerealella Oliv. (Lépidoptère, Gelechiidae). Conséquences écologiques. Thèse Doctoral, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, Tours

  • Svärd L, Wiklund C (1986) Different ejaculate delivery strategies in first versus subsequent matings in the swallowtail butterfly Papilio machaon L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svärd L, Wiklund C (1989) Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svärd L, Wiklund C (1991) The effect of ejaculate mass on female reproductive output in the european swallowtail butterfly, Papilio machaon L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J Insect Behav 4:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson MG, Marling E, Löfqvist J (1998) Mating behavior and reproductive potential in the turnip moth Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Insect Behav 11:343–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibout E (1978) L’activité sexuelle et le rôle de l’accouplement sur la reproduction d’un lépidoptère à distribution géographique étendue: Acrolepiopsis (Acrolepia) assectella Zell. (Hyponomeutoidae). Thèse Doctoral, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, Tours

  • Thibout E, Rahn R (1972) Etude de la variabilité du volume et du pouvoir fécondant des spermatophores successifs d’Acrolepia assectella Z. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Entomol Exp Appl 15:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  • Torres-Vila LM, Stockel J, Roehrich R (1995) Le potentiel reproducteur et ses variables biotiques associées chez le mâle de l’Eudémis de la vigne Lobesia botrana. Entomol Exp Appl 77:105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Vila LM, Stockel J, Rodríguez-Molina MC (1997) Physiological factors regulating polyandry in Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Physiol Entomol 22:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Vila LM, Gragera J, Rodríguez-Molina MC, Stockel J (2002) Heritable variation for female remating in Lobesia botrana, a usually monandrous moth. Anim Behav 64:899–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Vila LM, Rodríguez-Molina MC, Jennions MD (2004) Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

  • Turgeon JJ (1985) Life cycle and behavior of the spruce budmoth, Zeiraphera canadiensis (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae), in New Brunswick. Can Entomol 117:1239–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Unnithan GC, Paye SO (1990) Factors involved in mating, longevity, fecundity and egg fertility in the maize stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lep., Noctuidae). J Appl Entomol 109:295–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Unnithan GC, Paye SO (1991) Mating, longevity, fecundity and egg fertility of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): effects of delayed or successive matings an their relevance to pheromonal control methods. Environ Entomol 20:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahed K (1998) The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol Rev 73:43–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward KE, Landolt PJ (1995) Influence of multiple matings on fecundity and longevity of female cabbage looper moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 88:768–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Wiklund C, Bon’no M (1998) The effect of repeated matings on sperm numbers in successive ejaculates of the cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J Insect Behav 11:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N (1996) Mate quality affects reproductive effort in a paternally investing species. Am Nat 148:1075–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Karlsson B (2003) Paternal investment directly affects female reproductive effort in an insect. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2065–2071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Wiklund C, Cook PA (2002) Monandry and polyandry as alternative lifestyles in a butterfly. Behav Ecol 13:450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Kaitala A, Lindfors V, Abenius J (1993) Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Kaitala A, Wedell N (1998) Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly. Behav Ecol 9:20–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by the Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Consejería de Agricultura y Medio Ambiente, Junta de Extremadura, Spain (L.M.T.-V.) and by the Australian Research Council (M.D.J.). We also thank Professor Andrew Cockburn and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis M. Torres-Vila.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Cockburn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torres-Vila, L.M., Jennions, M.D. Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57, 318–326 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0857-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0857-7

Keywords

Navigation