Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social organization of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) appear remarkably similar. In this paper, field studies of these two species were used to (1) test a model of ecological constraints on animal group size which suggests that group size is a function of travel costs and (2) assess ecological and social factors underlying the social organization of these two species. Spider monkeys were studied over a 6-year period in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica, and chimpanzees were studied for 6 years in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Adults of both species spent their time in small subgroups that frequently changed size and composition. Thus, unlike most primate species, spider monkeys and chimpanzees were not always in a spatially cohesive social group; each individual had the option of associating in subgroups of a different size or composition. Both species relied on ripe fruit from trees that could be depleted through their feeding activity. However, spider monkey food resources tended to occur at higher densities, were more common, less temporally variable, and did not reach the low levels experienced by chimpanzees. Analyses of the relationship between subgroup size and the density and distribution of their food resources suggested that travel costs limit subgroup size. However, these ecological factors did not influence all age/sex classes equally. For example, the number of adult males in a subgroup was a function of food density and travel costs. However, this was not the case for female chimpanzees, suggesting that the benefits of being in a subgroup for females did not exceed the costs, even when ecological conditions appeared to minimize subgroup foraging costs. Therefore, it seems likely that social strategies influenced the relationship between food resource variables and subgroup size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann S (1974) Baboons, space, time, and energy. Am Zool 14: 221–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1977) Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats. 11. A model for the determination of group size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1: 383–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Butynski TM (1990) Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high- and low-density subpopulations. Ecol Monogr 60: 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA (1987) Flexibility in diets of three species of Costa Rican primates. Folia Primatol 49: 90–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA (1988) Patch use and patch depletion by the spider and howling monkeys of Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. Behaviour 105: 99–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA (1990a) Association patterns of spider monkeys: The influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26: 409–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA (1990b) Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates. Folia Primatol 55: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (1990) Density and growth rate of some tropical dry forest trees: Comparisons between successional forest types. Bull Torrey Bot Club 117: 226–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Lefebvre L (1990) Manipulating foraging group size: Spider monkey food calls at fruiting trees. Anim Behav 39: 891–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Wrangham RW (1993) Range use of the forest chimpanzees of Kibale: Implications for the evolution of chimpanzee social organization. Am J Primatol 31: 263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, McLaughlin RL (1989) Multiple central place foraging by spider monkeys: travel consequences of using many sleeping sites. Oecologia 79: 506–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wrangham RW, Hunt K, Gebo D, Gardner L (1992) Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24: 527–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, White FJ, Wrangham RW (1993) Defining subgroup size in fission-fusion societies. Folia Primatol 61: 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9: 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Wrangham R (1993) Acoustic analysis of wild chimpanzee pant hoots: do Kibale forest chimpanzees have an acoustically distinct food arrival pant hoot? Am J Primatol 31: 99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1977). Primate ecology and social organization. J Zool 183: 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittus W (1979) The evolution of behaviour regulating density and age-specific sex ratios in a primate population. Behaviour 69: 265–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg JF (1973) Reproduction in two species of spider monkeys Ateles fusciceps and Ateles geoffroyi. J Mammal 54: 955–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan LM, Baxter MJ (1984) Sex differences and social organization in free-ranging spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates 25: 279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiglieri MP (1984) The chimpanzee of Kibale Forest. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD (1990) Do chimpanzee copulatory calls incite malemale competition? Anim Behav 39: 596–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson CH, Schaik CP van (1988) Recognizing the many faces of primate food competition: Methods. Behaviour 105: 165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein LL (1971) Observations on copulation and seasonal reproduction of two species of spider monkeys, Ateles belzebuth and A. geoffroyi. Folia Primatol 15: 233–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein LL (1972) The ecology and social organization of spider monkeys Ateles belzebuth. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein LL (1974) Agonistic behaviour in neotropical primates. In: Holloway L (ed) Primate aggression, territoriality, and xenophobia. Academic Press, New York, pp 77–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein LL, Klein DB (1977) Feeding behaviour of the Columbian spider monkey, Ateles belzebuth. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 153–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton M, Leighton DR (1982) The relationship of size and feeding aggregate to size of food patch: Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) feeding in Trichilia cipo fruit trees on Barro Colorado Island. Biotropica 14: 81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DW (1979) The flexible social system of the golden jackal, Canis aureus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5: 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton K (1981) Food choice and digestive strategies of two sympatric primate species. Am Nat 117: 496–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton K (1984) Habitat, diet, and activity patterns of free-ranging wooly spider monkeys (Brachyteles arachnoides E. Geoffroyi 1806). Int J Primatol 5: 491–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters R, Cloutier S, Dube D, Evans A, Hastings P, Kohn D, Sawer-Foner B (1988) The ecology of the weight of fruit on trees and shrubs in Barbados. Oecologia 74: 612–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins D, Chapman CA, Wrangham RW (1991) Group size and stability: Why do gibbons and spider monkeys differ? Primates 32: 301–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli R, Klein LL (1976) An analysis of adult social spacing tendencies and related social interactions in a colony of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) at the San Francisco Zoo. Folia Primatol 25: 122–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorupa J (1988) The effect of selective timber harvesting on rainforest primates in Kibale Forest, Uganda. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R, Rohlf F (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Strier KB (1989) Effects of patch size on feeding associations in muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). Folia Primatol 52: 70–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker TT (1980) Comparison of the behaviour and ecology of red colobus and redtail monkeys in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Afr J Ecol 18: 33–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker TT, Leland L (1979) Socioecology of five sympatric monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Adv Study Behav 9: 159–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington M (1988) Demography, ranging patterns, and activity budgets of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus chamek) in the Manu National Park, Peru. Am J Primatol 15: 45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington M (1990) Fission-fusion social organization in Ateles and Pan. Int J Primatol 11: 47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J (1983) Five new world primates. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J, Janson CH (1986) The socioecology of primate groups. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17: 111–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin CEG (1979) Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Wrangham RW (1988) Feeding competition and patch size in the chimpanzee species Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes. Behaviour 105: 148–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten PL (1983) Diet and dominance among female vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Am J Primatol 5: 139–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW (1977) Feeding behaviour of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 504–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Smuts BB (1980) Sex differences in the behavioural ecology of chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. J Reprod Fert 28: 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Conklin NL, Chapman CA, Hunt KD (1991) The significance of fibrous foods for Kibale Forest chimpanzees. Phil Trans R Soc London 334: 171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Clark AP, Isabirye-Basuta G (1992) Female social relationships and social organization of Kibale Forest Chimpanzees. In: Nishida T, McGrew WC, Marler P, Pickford M, Waal F de (eds) Human origins. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo, pp 81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW Gittleman JL, Chapman CA (1993) Constraints on group size in primates and carnivores: population density and day-range as assays of exploitation competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32: 199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (1994) Seed dispersal by forest chimpanzees. J Trop Ecol 10: 355–368

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 326113261132611, USA

    C.A. Chapman & L.J. Chapman

  2. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

    R.W. Wrangham

Authors
  1. C.A. Chapman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L.J. Chapman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R.W. Wrangham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Communicated by M.A. Elgar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, C., Chapman, L. & Wrangham, R. Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36, 59–70 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175729

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175729

Key words

Search

Navigation