Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Natura 2000 Network for Wolf Conservation: A Case-Study in Greece

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wolf (Canis lupus) is used as a case study to rate Natura 2000 sites in Greece based on preferred wolf habitat characteristics and test whether the network is suitable for their conservation. Road density, agricultural area, site area, connectivity, food availability (i.e., presence of natural prey), and elevation in 237 sites are combined in a logistic regression model. The occurrence of the wolf’s natural prey was the most prevalent factor determining wolf presence, followed by agricultural cover. Considering the current status of these features at N2K site level, most sites currently hosting wolves (85.7 %) have good or excellent prospects for the long-term presence of the wolf. On the contrary, 11 sites which now have wolves are predicted to be ineffective in keeping them in the future due to the absence of wild ungulates and their high agricultural coverage. Four sites with no wolf presence currently have excellent prospects to host wolves in the future. Roadless sites are a priority for protection and retaining their current condition is strongly suggested. The proposed approach aims to detect gaps in protection for the wolf and identify priority sites in need of mitigation actions. It can also assist the assessment of conservation policies in Greece and elsewhere toward accomplishing set goals in protected areas. By focusing on wolf protection, we hope to increase agencies’ attention to deal with conservation effectiveness, especially in cases like Greece, where a number of sites are insufficiently known and protected and management measures are not properly implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams L (2004) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. J Wildl Manage 68:739–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkemade R, van Oorschot M, Miles L, Nellemann C, Bakkenes M, ten Brink B (2009) GLOBIO3: a framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems 12:374–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ament R, Clevenger AP, Yu O, Hardy A (2008) An assessment of road impacts on wildlife populations in U.S. National Parks. Environ Manage 42:480–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolopoulou E, Pantis JD (2009) Conceptual gaps in the national strategy for the implementation of the European Natura 2000 conservation policy in Greece. Biol Conserv 142:221–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB (2009) Protected areas and climate change in Europe. In: Convention on the conservation of European Wildlife and Natural habitats. Council of Europe Strasbourg

  • Araújo MB, Lobo JM, Moreno JC (2007) The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity. Conserv Biol 21:1423–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aravidis I, Giannakopoulos A, Iliopoulos Y, Korakis Y, Machalras Y, Mertzanis Y, Nikolakaki P, Selinidis K, Tslokanos K, Zisoulopou T (2009) First action plan for transportation infrastructure and habitat fragmentation in Greece. In: Proceeding from the 2nd European Congress of conservation biology, Prague

  • Baofa Y, Huyin H, Yili Z, Le Z, Wanhong W (2006) Influence of the Qinghai-Tibetan railway and highway on the activities of wild animals. Acta Ecol Sin 26:3917–3923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez-López A, Alkemade R, Verweij PA (2010) The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 143:1307–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisi J, Kurki S, Svensberg M, Liukkonen T (2007) Human dimensions of wolf (Canis lupus) conflicts in Finland. Eur J Wildl Res 53:304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco JC, Reig S, de la Cuesta L (1992) Distribution, status and conservation problems of the wolf (Canis lupus) in Spain. Biol Conserv 60:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L (1992) Wolf research and conservation in Italy. Biol Conserv 61:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L (2000) Action plan for the conservation of the wolves (Canis lupus) in Europe. Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats (Bern Convention) nature and environment, No. 113 Council of Europe Publishing

  • Boyd DK, Pletscher DH (1999) Characteristics of dispersal in a colonizing wolf population in the central Rocky Mountains. J Wildlife Manage 63:1094–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capitani C, Bertelli I, Varuzza P, Scandura M, Apollonio M (2004) A comparative analysis of wolf (Canis lupus) diet in three different Italian ecosystems. Mamm Biol 69:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Noss RF, Paquet PC (2002) Rocky Mountain Carnivore Project: final report. World Wildlife Fund Canada. Toronto, Ontario. http://www.klamathconservation.org/docs/RMCFULLREPORT.pdf. Accessed 25 September 2014

  • CBD (2006) Global Biodiversity Outlook 2. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD), Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapron G, Kaczensky P, Linnell JD, Von Arx M, Huber D, Andrén H et al (2014) Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346(6216):1517–1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chee YE (2004) An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol Conserv 120:549–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger AP, Chruszcz B, Gunson KE (2003) Spatial patterns and factors influencing small vertebrate fauna road-kill aggregations. Biol Conserv 109:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffin AW (2007) From roadkill to road ecology: a review of the ecological effects of roads. J Transp Geogr 15(5):396–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colino-Rabanal VJ, Lizana M, Peris SJ (2011) Factors influencing wolf Canis lupus roadkills in Northwest Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 57:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist MR, Wilmer B, Aplet GH (2005) Assessing the value of roadless areas in a conservation reserve strategy: biodiversity and landscape connectivity in the northern Rockies. J Appl Ecol 42:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman AJ (2010) Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Anim Conserv 13:458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos G, Memtsas D, Troumbis AY (2004) Questioning the efficacy of the Natura 2000 Special Areas of Conservation strategy: the case of Crete. Global Ecol Biogeogr 13:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2012) Protected areas in Europe—an overview. Report 5. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. Advanced techniques for beginners (Introducing Statistical Methods series). Sage publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29:207-C2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Chutshall CD, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman C, Heanue K, Jones JA, Swanson FJ, Turrentine T, Winter TC (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller TK, Berg WE, Radde GL, Lenarz MS, Joselvn GB (1992) A history and current estimate of wolf distribution and numbers in Minnesota. Wildl Soc Bull 20:42–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring TM, Potter BA (2005) Wolf habitat analysis in Michigan: an example of the need for proactive land management for carnivore species. Wildl Soc Bull 33:1237–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulinck H, Múgica M, de Lucio JV, Atauri JA (2001) A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 55:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J, Cobb P, Firbank L, Kull T, McCracken D, Moritz RFA, Niemelä J, Rebane M, Wascher D, Watt A, Young J (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochkirch A, SchmittT Beninde J, Hiery M, Kinitz T, Kirschey J, Proelss A (2013) Europe needs a new vision for a Natura 2020 network. Conserv Lett 6(6):462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson P, Travis JM, Prendergast JR, Evans J, Gregory RD, Telfer MG, Williams PH (2000) A preliminary assessment of the contribution of nature reserves to biodiversity conservation in Great Britain. Anim Conserv 3:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliopoulos Y, Sgardelis S, Koutis V, Savaris D (2009) Wolf depredation on livestock in central Greece. Acta Theriol 54:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliopoulos Y, Lazarou Y, Petridou M, Selinides K (2012) Wolf (Canis lupus) activity patterns in central Greece and northern Greece studied with satellite telemetry. In: Proceeding from the 12th international congress on the zoogeography and ecology of Greece and adjacent regions, 18–22 Athens, Greece

  • Iliopoulos Y, Youlatos D, Sgardelis S (2013) Wolf pack rendezvous site selection in Greece is mainly affected by anthropogenic landscape features. Eur J Wildl Res 60:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iojă CI, Pătroescu M, Rozylowicz L, Popescu VD, Vergheleţ M, Zotta MI, Felciuc M (2010) The efficacy of Romania’s protected areas network in conserving biodiversity. Biol Conserv 143(11):2468–2476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaarsma CF (1997) Approaches for the planning of rural road networks according to sustainable land use planning. Landsc Urban Plan 39:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG, Bowman J, Brennan J, Fahrig L, Bert D, Bouchard J, Charbonneau N, Frank K, Gruber B, von Toschanowitz KT (2005) Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behaviour. Ecol Model 185:329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jędrzejewski W, Jędrzejewska B, Zawadzka B, Borowik T, Nowak S, Mysłajek RW (2008) Habitat suitability model for Polish wolves based on long-term national census. Anim Conserv 11:377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins CN, Joppa L (2009) Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biol Conserv 142:2166–2174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen WF, Fuller TK, Robinson WL (1986) Wolf, Canis lupus, distribution on the Ontario-Michigan border near Sault Ste. Marie. Can Field Nat 100:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG (1995) Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks. Landsc Urban Plan 32:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallimanis AS, Tsiafouli MA, Pantis JD, Mazaris AD, Matsinos Y, Sgardelis SP (2008) Arable land and habitat diversity in Natura 2000 sites in Greece. J Biol Res-Thessalon 9:55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamanlidis AA, Beecham J, Hernando MG, Georgiadis L, Grivas K, Krambokoukis L, Panagiotopoulos N, Papakostas G (2012) Monitoring the effects of the highway Siatista-Krystallopygi (K45) on wildlife in Greece. In: Proceeding from the 12th international congress on the zoogeography and ecology of Greece and adjacent regions, 18–22 Athens, Greece

  • Kareiva P, Marvier M (2012) What is conservation science? Bioscience 62:962–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson J, Sjöström M (2007) Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biol Conserv 13:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline NC, Swann DE (1998) Quantifying wildlife road mortality in Saguaro National Park. In: International conference on wildlife ecology and transportation

  • Kojola I, Aspi J, Hakala A, Heikkinen S, Ilmoni C, Ronkainen S (2006) Dispersal in an expanding wolf population in Finland. J Mamm 87:281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusak J, Skrbinšek AM, Huber D (2005) Home ranges, movements, and activity of wolves (Canis lupus) in the Dalmatian part of Dinarids, Croatia. Eur J Wildl Res 51:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrance SGW, Stouffer PC, Laurance WF (2004) Effects of road clearings on movement patterns of understory rainforest birds in central Amazonia. Conserv Biol 18:1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux L, Crooks S, Jordan A, Kerry Turner R (2000) Implementing EU biodiversity policy: UK experiences. Land Use Policy 17:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legakis A, Maragou P (2009) The red data book of threatened animal species of Greece. Hellenic Zoological Society, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • LIFE (2001) Life-Nature. Wolf conservation (Canis lupus) and its habitats in Greece (LIFE97NAT/4249). General Secretariat of Forests and Nature Environment of the Ministry of Agriculture

  • Lin SC (2006) The ecologically ideal road density for small islands: the case of Kinmen. Ecol Eng 27:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnell JD, Boitani L (2011) Building biological realism into wolf management policy: the development of the population approach in Europe. Hystrix 23(1):80–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell JDC, Swenson JE, Andersen R (2001) Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Anim Conserv 4:345–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace RD, Waller JS, Manley TL, Lyon LJ, Zuuring H (1996) Relationships among grizzly bears, roads and habitat in the Swan Mountains Montana. J Appl Ecol 33:1395–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 Network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallard F, François D (2013) Effectiveness of the legal framework for natural areas protection relative to French road projects. Land Use Policy 30:582–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinis G, Emmanoloudis D, Giannakopoulos V, Maris F, Koutsias N (2010) Mapping and interpreting historical land cover/land use changes in a Natura 2000 site using earth observational data: the case of Nestos delta, Greece. Appl Geogr 31:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marboutin E, Pruszek M, Calegne C, Duchamp C (2011) On the effects of grid size and shape when mapping the distribution range of a recolonising wolf (Canis lupus) population. Eur J Wildl Res 57:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (1989) Wolf population survival in an area of high road density. Am Mid Nat 121:387–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (1995) The challenge and opportunity of recovering wolf populations. Conserv Biol 9:270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD, Fritts SH, Radde GL, Paul WJ (1988) Wolf distribution and road density in Minnesota. Wildl Soc Bull 16:85–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigi A, Lovari S (1996) A review of wolf depredation in southern Europe: does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? J Appl Ecol 33:1561–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill SB, Mech LD (2000) Details of extensive movements by Minnesota wolves (Canis lupus). Am Mid Nat 144:428–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migli D, Youlatos D, Iliopoulos Y (2005) Winter food habits of wolves in central Greece. J Biol Res-Thessalon 4:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkonen N, Moilanen A (2013) Identification of top priority areas and management landscapes from a national Natura 2000 network. Environ Sci Policy 27:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulcak F, Newig J, Milcu AI, Hartel T, Fischer J (2013) Integrating rural development and biodiversity conservation in Central Romania. Environ Conserv 40:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, Sickley TA, Haight RG, Wydeven AP (1995) A regional landscape analysis and prediction of favorable Gray Wolf habitat in the northern Great Lakes region. Conserv Biol 9:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, Sickley TA, Wydeven AP (1999) Predicting grey wolf landscape recolonization: logistic regression model vs. new field data. Ecol Appl 9:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, Clayton MK, Pratt SD, Sickley TA, Wydeven AP (2009) Change in occupied wolf habitat in the northern Great Lakes region. In: Van Deelen TR, Heske EJ, Wydeven AP (eds) Recovery of Gray wolves in the Great Lakes region of the United States. Springer, New York, pp 119–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nantsou T, Chasiotis G, Christopoulou Ι, Georgiadis Ν, Paximadis G, Plitharas Α, Korakaki Ε, Kordopatis P (2012) WWF Greece. Commitments for implementation—environmental legislation in Greece. Summary. Annual review. Athens

  • Papageorgiou N (1990) Biology of wild fauna. University Studio Press, Thessaloniki

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou K, Vogiatzakis IN (2006) Nature protection in Greece: an appraisal of the factors shaping integrative conservation and policy effectiveness. Environ Sci Policy 9:476–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou N, Vlachos C, Sfougaris A, Tsachalidis E (1994) Status and diet of wolves in Greece. Acta Theriol 39:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou HI, Kati VI (2007) Current status of the Balkan chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra balcanica) in Greece: implications for conservation. Belg J Zool 137(1):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet PC, Strittholt JR, Staus NL, Wilson PJ, Grewal S, White BN (2001) Feasibility of timber wolf reintroduction in Adirondack Park Large mammal restoration: ecological and social challenges in the 21st century. Island Press, Washington, pp 47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks SA, Harcourt AH (2002) Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in US protected areas. Conserv Biol 16:800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauchard A, Alaback PB (2004) Influence of elevation, land use, and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected areas of south-central Chile. Conserv Biol 18:238–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pooley SP, Mendelsohn JA, Milner-Gulland EJ (2014) Hunting down the chimera of multiple disciplinarity in conservation science. Conserv Biol 28:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu VD, Rozylowicz L, Niculae IM, Cucu AL, Hartel T (2014) Species, habitats, society: an evaluation of research supporting EU’s Natura 2000 Network. PLoS One 9(11):e113648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riley SPD, Pollinger JP, Sauvajot RM, York EC, Bromley C, Fuller TK, Wayne RK (2006) A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores. Mol Ecol 15:1733–1741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roose A, Sepp K (2010) Monitoring framework for assessing changes of the Estonian rural landscape in adopting European agricultural policies. Eur Countrys 2(1):42–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Salcedo M, Martínez I, Carreño F, Escudero A (2013) Poor effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network protecting Mediterranean lichen species. J Nat Conserv 21:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatori V, Linnell J (2005) Report on the conservation status and threats for wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe. Council of Europe TPVS/Inf (2005) 16

  • Saunders SC, Mislivets MR, Chen J, Cleland DT (2002) Effects of roads on landscape structure within nested ecological units of the Northern Great Lakes Region, USA. Biol Conserv 103:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seip DR (1992) Factors limiting woodland caribou populations and their interrelationships with wolves and moose in southeastern British Columbia. Can J Zool 70(8):1494–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selva N, Kreft S, Kati V, Schluck M, Jonsson BG, Mihok B, Okarma H, Ibisch PL (2011) Roadless and low-traffic areas as conservation targets in Europe. Environ Manage 48:865–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard DB, Kuhns AR, Dreslik MJ, Phillips CA (2008) Roads as barriers to animal movement in fragmented landscapes. Anim Conserv 11:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (2002) SPSS for Windows, Rel. 15.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Strittholt JR, Dellasala DA (2001) Importance of roadless areas in biodiversity conservation in forested ecosystems: case study of the Klamath-Siskiyou ecoregion of the United States. Conserv Biol 15:1742–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulkava S, Pulliainen E (1999) Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758. In: Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W et al. (eds) The Atlas of European Mammals. T&AD Poyser, London, pp 314–315

  • Switalski TA, Bissonette JA, DeLuca TH, Luce CH, Madej MA (2004) Benefits and impacts of road removal. Front Ecol Environ 2:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassinari P, Torreggiani D, Benni S (2013) Dealing with agriculture, environment and landscape in spatial planning: a discussion about the Italian case study. Land Use Policy 30:739–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel RR (1985) Relationship between road densities and habitat suitability in Wisconsin. Am Midl Nat 113:404–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurber JM, Peterson RO, Drummer TD, Thomasma SA (1994) Gray wolf response to refuge boundaries and roads in Alaska. Wildl Soc Bull 22:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Treves A, Karanth KU (2003) Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv Biol 17(6):1491–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochet A, Schmeller DS (2013) Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network to cover threatened species. Nat Conserv 4:35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiafouli MA, Apostolopoulou E, Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Drakou EG, Pantis JD (2013) Human activities in Natura 2000 Sites: a highly diversified conservation network. Environ Manage 51(5):1025–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnock D (2002) Ecoregion-based conservation in the Carpathians and the land-use implications. Land Use Policy 19:47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Grift EA, van der Ree R, Fahrig L, Findlay S, Houlahan J, Jaeger JA et al (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures. Biodivers Conserv 22(2):425–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Langevelde F, Jaarsma CF (2009) Modelling the effect of traffic calming on local animal population persistence. Ecol. Soc. 14:39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art39/. Accessed 1 October 2014

  • Votsi NEP, Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Zomeni MS, Vogiatzakis IN, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2012) Road effects on habitat richness of the Greek Natura 2000 network. Nat Conserv 1:53–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington J, Clair CC, Mercer G (2004) Path tortuosity and the permeability of roads and trails to wolf movement. Ecol Soc 9:4. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art4. Accessed 13 October 2014

  • Whittington J, Clair CC, Mercer G (2005) Spatial responses of wolves to roads and trails in mountain valleys. Ecol Appl 15(2):543–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wydenev AP, Mladenoff DJ, Sickley TA, Kohn BA, Thiel RP, Hansen JL (2001) Road density as a factor in habitat selection by wolves and other carnivores in the Great Lakes Region. Endanger Species Update 18:110–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Young J, Watt A, Nowicki P, Alard D, Clitherow J, Henle K, Johnson R, Laczko E, McCracken D, Matouch S, Niemela J, Richards C (2005) Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodivers Conserv 14:1641–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zomeni M, Tzanopoulos J, John JD (2008) Historical analysis of landscape change using remote sensing techniques: an explanatory tool for agricultural transformation in Greek rural areas. Landsc Urban Plan 86(1):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the EU FP7 SCALES Project: “Securing the Conservation of biodiversity across Administrative Levels and spatial, temporal and Ecological Scales”, Project #40075 “Assessment of Quiet Areas at European level”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Nefta-Eleftheria P. Votsi & J. D. Pantis

  2. Environmental Conservation and Management Programme, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Open University of Cyprus, Giannou Kranidioti 33, 1st Floor, Latsia, 2220, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Maria S. Zomeni

Authors
  1. Nefta-Eleftheria P. Votsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria S. Zomeni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. D. Pantis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nefta-Eleftheria P. Votsi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 522 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Votsi, NE.P., Zomeni, M.S. & Pantis, J.D. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Natura 2000 Network for Wolf Conservation: A Case-Study in Greece. Environmental Management 57, 257–270 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0621-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0621-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation