Skip to main content
Log in

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for prediction and monitoring of treatment response

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting and monitoring chemoradiotherapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed pre-treatment (n = 50), intra-treatment (n = 41) and post-treatment (n = 20). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were correlated with locoregional failure (LF).

Results

Locoregional failure occurred in 20/50 (40%) patients. A significant correlation was found between LF and post-treatment ADC (p = 0.02) but not pre- or intra-treatment ADC. Serial change in ADC was even more significant (p = 0.00001), using a fall in ADC early (pre- to intra-treatment) or late (intra- to post-treatment) to indicate LF, achieved 100% specificity, 80% sensitivity and 90% accuracy.

Conclusions

Single ADC measurements pre- or intra-treatment did not predict response, but ADC post-treatment was a marker for LF. Serial change in ADC was an even stronger marker, when using an early or late treatment fall in ADC to identify LF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCollum AD, Burrell SC, Haddad RI et al (2004) Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose to predict pathologic response after induction chemotherapy and definitive chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 26:890–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rogers JW, Greven KM, McGuirt WF et al (2004) Can post-RT neck dissection be omitted for patients with head-and-neck cancer who have a negative PET scan after definitive radiation therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:694–697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F et al (2001) Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 220:621–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H et al (2005) Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1186–1192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T et al (2003) Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. Am J Neuroradiol 24:1627–1634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Habermann CR, Gossrau P, Graessner J et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI: a valuable tool for differentiating primary parotid gland tumors? Rofo 177:940–945

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DKW et al (2007) Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of MR diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Radiology 245:806–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Vander Poortan V et al (2009) Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 251:134–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Bondt RB, Hoeberigs MC, Nelemans PJ et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy and additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology 51:183–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holzapfel K, Duetsch S, Fauser C et al (2009) Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol 72:381–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 15:986–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Nuyts S et al (2007) Detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion weighted MRI after (chemo) radiotherapy: correlation between radiologic and histopathologic findings. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:960–971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdel Razek AA, Kandeel AY, Soliman N et al (2007) Role of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation of residual or recurrent head and neck tumors and posttreatment changes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1146–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Som PM (1987) Lymph nodes of the Neck. Radiology 165:593–600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van der Brekel MWM, Stel HV, Castelijns JA et al (1990) Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology 177:379–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chenevert TL, Stegman LD, Taylor JM et al (2000) Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:2029–2036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pickles MD, Gibbs Peter, Lowry M et al (2006) Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 24:843–847

  18. Moffat BA, Chenevert TL, Meyer CR et al (2006) The functional diffusion map: an imaging biomarker for the early prediction of cancer treatment outcome. Neoplasia 8:259–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mardor Y, Pfeffer R, Spiegelmann R et al (2003) Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 21:1094–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma U, Danishad KK, Seenu V et al (2009) Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. NMR Biomed 22:104–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Theilmann RJ, Borders R, Trouard TP et al (2004) Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. Neoplasia 6:831–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao M, Pipe JG, Bonnett J et al (1996) Early detection of treatment response by diffusion-weighted 1H-NMR spectroscopy in a murine tumour in vivo. Br J Cancer 73:61–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Chen F et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows noninvasive in vivo monitoring of the effects of combretastatin a-4 phosphate after repeated administration. Neoplasia 7:779–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chenevert TL, McKeever PE, Ross BD (1997) Monitoring early response of experimental brain tumors to therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Cancer Res 3:1457–1466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee KC, Hall DE, Hoff BA et al (2006) Dynamic imaging of emerging resistance during cancer therapy. Cancer Res 66:4687–4692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this study was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project number 4300/04).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann D. King.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, A.D., Mo, F.K.F., Yu, KH. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for prediction and monitoring of treatment response. Eur Radiol 20, 2213–2220 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1769-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1769-8

Keywords

Navigation