Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Bilateral Superior Laryngeal Nerve Lesion on Swallowing: A Novel Method to Quantitate Aspirated Volume and Pharyngeal Threshold in Videofluoroscopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose was to determine the effect of bilateral superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) lesion on swallowing threshold volume and the occurrence of aspiration, using a novel measurement technique for videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) in infant pigs. We used a novel radiographic phantom to assess volume of the milk containing barium from fluoroscopy. The custom made phantom was firstly calibrated by comparing image intensity of the phantom with known cylinder depths. Secondly, known volume pouches of milk in a pig cadaver were compared to volumes calculated with the phantom. Using these standards, we calculated the volume of milk in the valleculae, esophagus and larynx, for 205 feeding sequences from four infant pigs feeding before and after had bilateral SLN lesions. Swallow safety was assessed using the tested and validated IMPAS (Dysphagia 28(2):178–187, 2013). The log-linear correlation between image intensity values from the phantom filled with barium milk and the known phantom cylinder depths was strong (R 2 > 0.95), as was the calculated volumes of the barium milk pouches. The threshold volume of bolus in the valleculae during feeding was significantly larger after bilateral SLN lesion than in control swallows (p < 0.001). The IMPAS score increased in the lesioned swallows relative to the controls, indicating substantially impaired swallowing (p < 0.001). Bilateral SLN lesion dramatically increased the aspiration incidence and the threshold volume of bolus in valleculae. The use of this phantom permits quantification of the aspirated volume of fluid, allowing for more accurate 3D volume estimation from 2D X-ray in VFSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holman SD, et al. Development, reliability, and validation of an infant mammalian penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 2013;28(2):178–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marik PE, Kaplan D. Aspiration pneumonia and dysphagia in the elderly. Chest. 2003;124(1):328–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Maarel-Wierink CD, et al. Meta-analysis of dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia in frail elders. J Dent Res. 2011;90(12):1398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rugiu MG. Role of videofluoroscopy in evaluation of neurologic dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27(6):306–16.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Connell DA, et al. Swallowing function in patients with base of tongue cancers treated with primary surgery and reconstructed with a modified radial forearm free flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(8):857–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pauloski BR, et al. Relationship between manometric and videofluoroscopic measures of swallow function in healthy adults and patients treated for head and neck cancer with various modalities. Dysphagia. 2009;24(2):196–203.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dua K, et al. Pharyngeal airway protective reflexes are triggered before the maximum volume of fluid that the hypopharynx can safely hold is exceeded. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;301(2):G197–202.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueda N, et al. Effects of the bolus volume on hyoid movements in normal individuals. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(7):491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarus CL, et al. Effects of bolus volume, viscosity, and repeated swallows in nonstroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(10):1066–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Variation in temporal measures of swallowing: sex and volume effects. Dysphagia. 2013;28(2):226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren J, et al. Effect of age and bolus variables on the coordination of the glottis and upper esophageal sphincter during swallowing. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88(5):665–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaker R, et al. Effect of aging, position, and temperature on the threshold volume triggering pharyngeal swallows. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(2):396–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Imam H, Marrero F, Shay S. Impedance nadir values correlate with barium bolus amount. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(7):600–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding P, et al. The effect of unilateral superior laryngeal nerve lesion on swallowing threshold volume. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(8):1942–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller AJ. In: Rosenbek JC, editor. The Neuroscientific Principles of Swallowing and Dysphagia. Dysphagia Series. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc; 1999. p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller AJ. Oral and pharyngeal reflexes in the mammalian nervous system: their diverse range in complexity and the pivotal role of the tongue. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13(5):409–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller AJ. The neurobiology of swallowing and dysphagia. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(2):77–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding P, et al. Unilateral superior laryngeal nerve lesion in an animal model of dysphagia and its effect on sucking and swallowing. Dysphagia. 2013;28(3):404–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holman SD, et al. Swallowing kinematics and airway protection after palatal local anesthesia in infant pigs. Laryngoscope. 2013;124(2):436–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Holman SD, et al. Sucking and swallowing rates after palatal anesthesia: an electromyographic study in infant pigs. J Neurophysiol. 2013;110(2):387–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. German RZ, et al. The mechanism of suckling in two species of infant mammal: miniature pigs and long-tailed macaques. J Exp Zool. 1992;261(3):322–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thexton AJ, Crompton AW, German RZ. Transition from suckling to drinking at weaning: a kinematic and electromyographic study in miniature pigs. J Exp Zool. 1998;280(5):327–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. German RZ, Crompton AW, Thexton AJ. Variation in EMG activity: a hierarchical approach. Integr Comp Biol. 2008;48:272–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ding P, Tufano RP, German RZ. Anatomical anomalies of the laryngeal branches of the vagus nerve in pigs (Sus scrofa). Lab Anim. 2012;46(4):338–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holman SD, et al. Development, reliability, and validation of an infant mammalian penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 2012;28(2):178–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Doncaster CP, Davey AJH. Analysis of variance and covariance: How to choose and construct models for the life sciences. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 288.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun Z. Multislice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: 3D visualizations. Front Med. 2011;5(3):254–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dorosz JL, et al. Performance of 3-dimensional echocardiography in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(20):1799–808.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meier JD, Glasgold RA, Glasgold MJ. 3D photography in the objective analysis of volume augmentation including fat augmentation and dermal fillers. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011;19(4):725–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Furman MB, et al. Injectate volumes needed to reach specific landmarks in s1 transforaminal epidural injections. Pain Med. 2012;13(10):1265–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Neter J, et al. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago: Irwin; 1996. p. 1408.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jafari S, et al. Sensory regulation of swallowing and airway protection: a role for the internal superior laryngeal nerve in humans. J Physiol. 2003;550(Pt 1):287–304.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shin DU, et al. Bilateral internal superior laryngeal nerve palsy of traumatic cervical injury patient who presented as loss of cough reflex after anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;52(3):264–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Laurie Pipitone for her support in the radiologic procedures and tests. We also thank Melanie Albano and Kristy Koenig for their work in the animal surgery and Stacey L. Lukasik for her assistance during the whole study. This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, DC009980 to RZG.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Z. German.

Additional information

The work was done in the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, P., Fung, G.SK., Lin, M. et al. The Effect of Bilateral Superior Laryngeal Nerve Lesion on Swallowing: A Novel Method to Quantitate Aspirated Volume and Pharyngeal Threshold in Videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia 30, 47–56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9572-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9572-3

Keywords

Navigation