Abstract
For the past two decades, behavioural ecologists have documented consistent individual differences in behavioural traits within species and found evidence for animal “personality”. It is only relatively recently, however, that increasing numbers of researchers have begun to investigate individual differences in cognitive ability within species. It has been suggested that cognitive test batteries may provide an ideal tool for this growing research endeavour. In fact, cognitive test batteries have now been used to examine the causes, consequences and underlying structure of cognitive performance within and between many species. In this review, we document the existing attempts to develop cognitive test batteries for non-human animals and review the claims that these studies have made in terms of the structure and evolution of cognition. We argue that our current test battery methods could be improved on multiple fronts, from the design of tasks, to the domains targeted and the species tested. Refining and optimising test battery design will provide many benefits. In future, we envisage that well-designed cognitive test batteries may provide answers to a range of exciting questions, including giving us greater insight into the evolution and structure of cognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adolphs R (1999) Social cognition and the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 3:469–479
Amici F, Barney B, Johnson VE et al (2012) A modular mind? A test using individual data from seven primate species. PLoS ONE 7:e51918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051918
Amici F, Call J, Aureli F (2017) Co-existence of general intelligence and specialized modules. Behav Brain Sci 40:e196. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16001576
Anderson B (1993) Evidence from the rat for a general factor that underlies cognitive performance and that relates to brain size: intelligence? Neurosci Lett 153(1):98–102
Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J et al (2015) Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature 518:538–541. doi:10.1038/nature13998
Arden R, Adams MJ (2016) A general intelligence factor in dogs. Intelligence 55:79–85. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.01.008
Banerjee K, Chabris CF, Johnson VE et al (2009) General intelligence in another primate: individual differences across cognitive task performance in a New World monkey (Saguinus oedipus). PLoS ONE 4:e5883. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005883
Bebus SE, Small TW, Jones BC et al (2016) Associative learning is inversely related to reversal learning and varies with nestling corticosterone exposure. Anim Behav 111:251–260. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.10.027
Biro PA, Stamps JA (2008) Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:361–368. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.003
Boogert NJ, Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L (2008) Song complexity correlates with learning ability in zebra finch males. Anim Behav 76:1735–1741. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.009
Boogert NJ, Anderson RC, Peters S et al (2011) Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour reaching, but not with other cognitive measures. Anim Behav 81:1209–1216. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.004
Bouchard J, Goodyer W, Lefebvre L (2007) Social learning and innovation are positively correlated in pigeons (Columba livia). Anim Cogn 10:259–266. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0064-1
Bshary R, Grutter AS (2006) Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature 441:975–978. doi:10.1038/nature04755
Burkart JM, Schubiger MN, van Schaik CP (2017a) Future directions for studying the evolution of general intelligence. Behav Brain Sci 40:e224. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000024
Burkart JM, Schubiger MN, van Schaik CP (2017b) The evolution of general intelligence. Behav Brain Sci 40:1–65. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16000959
Carere C, Maestripieri D (2013) Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Carroll JB (1993) Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Carter AJ, Feeney WE, Marshall HH et al (2013) Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:465–475. doi:10.1111/brv.12007
Cauchard L, Boogert NJ, Lefebvre L et al (2013) Problem-solving performance is correlated with reproductive success in a wild bird population. Anim Behav 85:19–26. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.005
Chandra SB, Hosler JS, Smith BH (2000) Heritable variation for latent inhibition and its correlation with reversal learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Psychol 114:86–97
Cheke LG, Clayton NS (2012) Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius) overcome their current desires to anticipate two distinct future needs and plan for them appropriately. Biol Lett 8:171–175. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0909
Cheke LG, Bird CD, Clayton NS (2011) Tool-use and instrumental learning in the Eurasian jay (Garrulus glandarius). Anim Cogn 14:441–455. doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0379-4
Chow PKY, Lea SEG, Leaver LA (2016) How practice makes perfect: the role of persistence, flexibility and learning in problem-solving efficiency. Anim Behav 112:273–283. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.11.014
Cole EF, Morand-Ferron J, Hinks AE, Quinn JL (2012) Cognitive ability influences reproductive life history variation in the wild. Curr Biol 22:1808–1812. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.051
Crocker L, Algina J (1986) Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Orlando
Croston R, Branch CL, Kozlovsky DY et al (2015a) Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits. Behav Ecol 26:1447–1459. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv088
Croston R, Branch CL, Kozlovsky DY et al (2015b) The importance of heritability estimates for understanding the evolution of cognition: a response to comments on Croston et al. Behav Ecol 26:1463–1464. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv192
Deaner R, Van Schaik C, Johnson V (2006) Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evol Psychol 4:149–196
Deary IJ (2001) Human intelligence differences: a recent history. Trends Cogn Sci 5:127–130. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01621-1
Deary IJ, Spinath FM, Bates TC (2006) Genetics of intelligence. Eur J Hum Genet 14:690–700. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201588
Deary IJ, Penke L, Johnson W (2010) The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:201–211. doi:10.1038/nrn2793
Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004) The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science (80-) 306:1903–1907. doi:10.1126/science.1098410
Forss SIF, Willems E, Call J, van Schaik CP (2016) Cognitive differences between orang-utan species: a test of the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Sci Rep 6:30516. doi:10.1038/srep30516
Galsworthy MJ, Paya-Cano JL, Monleón S, Plomin R (2002) Evidence for general cognitive ability (g) in heterogeneous stock mice and an analysis of potential confounds. Genes Brain Behav 1:88–95. doi:10.1034/j.1601-183X.2002.10204.x
Galsworthy MJ, Paya-Cano JL, Liu L et al (2005) Assessing reliability, heritability and general cognitive ability in a battery of cognitive tasks for laboratory mice. Behav Genet 35:675–692. doi:10.1007/s10519-005-3423-9
Galsworthy MJ, Arden R, Chabris CF (2014) Animal models of general cognitive ability for genetic research into cognitive functioning. In: Finkel D, Reynolds CA (eds) Behavior genetics of cognition across the lifespan. Springer, New York, pp 257–278
Gardner H (2017) Taking a multiple intelligences (MI) perspective. Behav Brain Sci 40:e203. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16001631
Gray JR, Thompson PM (2004) Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:471–482. doi:10.1038/nrn1405
Griffin AS, Guez D (2016) Bridging the gap between cross-taxon and within-species analyses of behavioural innovations in birds: making sense of discrepant cognition-innovation relationships and the role of motor diversity. Adv Study Behav. doi:10.1016/bs.asb.2016.02.001
Griffin AS, Guez D, Lermite F, Patience M (2013) Tracking changing environments: innovators are fast, but not flexible learners. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084907
Griffin AS, Guillette LM, Healy SD (2015) Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field. Trends Ecol Evol 30:207–214. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.012
Hare B (2001) Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition? Anim Cogn 4:269–280. doi:10.1007/s100710100084
Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V (2004) Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis. Organ Res Methods 7:191–205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675
Herrmann E, Call J (2012) Are there geniuses among the apes? Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:2753–2761. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0191
Herrmann E, Call J, Hernàndez-Lloreda MV et al (2007) Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science (80-) 317:1360–1366. doi:10.1126/science.1146282
Herrmann E, Hernández-Lloreda MV, Call J et al (2010) The structure of individual differences in the cognitive abilities of children and chimpanzees. Psychol Sci 21:102–110. doi:10.1177/0956797609356511
Hopkins WD, Russell JL, Schaeffer J (2014) Chimpanzee intelligence is heritable. Curr Biol 24:1649–1652. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.076
Huber L (2017) Where is the evidence for general intelligence in non-human animals? Behav Brain Sci 40:e206. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16001667
Isden J, Panayi C, Dingle C, Madden J (2013) Performance in cognitive and problem-solving tasks in male spotted bowerbirds does not correlate with mating success. Anim Behav 86:829–838. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.07.024
Izquierdo A, Jentsch JD (2012) Reversal learning as a measure of impulsive and compulsive behavior in addictions. Psychopharmacology 219:607–620. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2579-7
Jelbert SA, Taylor AH, Gray RD (2016) Does absolute brain size really predict self-control? Hand-tracking training improves performance on the A-not-B task. Biol Lett 12:20150871. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0871
Keagy J, Savard J-F, Borgia G (2009) Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. Anim Behav 78:809–817. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.011
Keagy J, Savard J-F, Borgia G (2011) Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Anim Behav 81:1063–1070. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.018
Kis A, Huber L, Wilkinson A (2015) Social learning by imitation in a reptile (Pogona vitticeps). Anim Cogn 18:325–331. doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0803-7
Kolata S, Light K, Townsend DA et al (2005) Variations in working memory capacity predict individual differences in general learning abilities among genetically diverse mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem 84:241–246. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2005.07.006
Kolata S, Light K, Grossman HC et al (2007) Selective attention is a primary determinant of the relationship between working memory and general learning ability in outbred mice. Learn Mem 14:22–28. doi:10.1101/lm.408507
Kolata S, Light K, Matzel LD (2008) Domain-specific and domain-general learning factors are expressed in genetically heterogeneous CD-1 mice. Intelligence 36:619–629. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.12.001
Light KR, Kolata S, Wass C et al (2010) Working memory training promotes general cognitive abilities in genetically heterogeneous mice. Curr Biol 20:777–782. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.034
Locurto C, Fortin E, Sullivan R (2003) The structure of individual differences in heterogeneous stock mice across problem types and motivational systems. Genes Brain Behav 2:40–55. doi:10.1034/j.1601-183X.2003.00006.x
MacLean EL, Hare B, Nunn CL et al (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E2140–E2148. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323533111
Maille A, Schradin C (2016) Survival is linked with reaction time and spatial memory in African striped mice. Biol Lett 12:277–286. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2016.0346
Matzel LD, Sauce B (2017) Evolution, brain size, and variations in intelligence. Behav Brain Sci 40:e213. doi:10.1017/S0140525X16001722
Matzel LD, Han YR, Grossman H et al (2003) Individual differences in the expression of a “general” learning ability in mice. J Neurosci 23:6423–6433
Morand-Ferron J, Quinn JL (2015) The evolution of cognition in natural populations. Trends Cogn Sci 19:235–237. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.005
Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Quinn JL (2015) Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challenges. Biol Rev. doi:10.1111/brv.12174
Nawroth C, von Borell E, Langbein J (2015) “Goats that stare at men”: dwarf goats alter their behaviour in response to human head orientation, but do not spontaneously use head direction as a cue in a food-related context. Anim Cogn 18:65–73. doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0777-5
O’Connor BP (2000) SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
Osborne JW, Costello AB (2004) Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 9:8
Ostojić L, Shaw RC, Cheke LG, Clayton NS (2013) Evidence suggesting that desire-state attribution may govern food sharing in Eurasian jays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4123–4128. doi:10.1073/pnas.1209926110
Plomin R (2001) The genetics of g in human and mouse. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:136–141
Plomin R, Spinath FM (2002) Genetics and general cognitive ability (g). Trends Cogn Sci 6:169–176
Plotnik JM, Shaw RC, Brubaker DL et al (2014) Thinking with their trunks: elephants use smell but not sound to locate food and exclude nonrewarding alternatives. Anim Behav 88:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.011
Powlesland RG (1997) Protocols for monitoring New Zealand robins. Dep Conserv Tech Ser 13:1–14
Raine NE, Chittka L (2012) No trade-off between learning speed and associative flexibility in bumblebees: a reversal learning test with multiple colonies. PLoS ONE 7:e45096. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045096
Reader SM, Laland KN (2002) Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4436–4441. doi:10.1073/pnas.062041299
Reader SM, Hager Y, Laland KN (2011) The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:1017–1027. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0342
Reale D, Reader SM, Sol D et al (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:291–318
Rowe C, Healy SD (2014) Measuring variation in cognition. Behav Ecol 25:1287–1292. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru090
Salwiczek LH, Prétôt L, Demarta L et al (2012) Adult cleaner wrasse outperform capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and orang-utans in a complex foraging task derived from cleaner–client reef fish cooperation. PLoS ONE 7:e49068. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049068
Sauce B, Matzel LD (2013) The causes of variation in learning and behavior: why individual differences matter. Front Psychol 4:2–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00395
Schmelz M, Krüger O, Call J, Krause ET (2015) A comparison of spontaneous problem-solving abilities in three Estrildid finch (Taeniopygia guttata, Lonchura striata var. domestica, Stagonopleura guttata) species. J Comp Psychol 129:356–365. doi:10.1037/a0039646
Schmitt V, Pankau B, Fischer J (2012) Old world monkeys compare to apes in the primate cognition test battery. PLoS ONE 7:e32024. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032024
Sewall KB, Soha J, Peters S, Nowicki S (2013) Potential trade-off between vocal ornamentation and spatial ability in a songbird. Biol Lett 9:20130344
Shaw RC (2017) Testing cognition in the wild: factors affecting performance and individual consistency in two measures of avian cognition. Behav Process 134:31–36. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.004
Shaw RC, Clayton NS (2014) Pilfering Eurasian jays use visual and acoustic information to locate caches. Anim Cogn 17:1281–1288. doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0763-y
Shaw RC, MacKinlay RD (2016) Destruction of a North Island robin (Petroica longipes) nest by a little spotted kiwi (Apteryx owenii). Notornis 63:46–49
Shaw RC, Plotnik JM, Clayton NS (2013) Exclusion in corvids: the performance of food-caching Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius). J Comp Psychol 127:428–435. doi:10.1037/a0032010
Shaw RC, Boogert NJ, Clayton NS, Burns KC (2015) Wild psychometrics: evidence for “general” cognitive performance in wild New Zealand robins, Petroica longipes. Anim Behav 109:101–111. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.001
Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution, and behaviour, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009
Smith BR, Blumstein DT (2008) Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 19:448–455. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm144
Smith C, Philips A, Reichard M (2015) Cognitive ability is heritable and predicts the success of an alternative mating tactic. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20151046. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1046
Tapp PD, Siwak C, Estrada J et al (2003) Size and reversal learning in the beagle dog as a measure of executive function and inhibitory control in aging. Learn Mem 10:64–73. doi:10.1101/lm.54403
Thornton A, Lukas D (2012) Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:2773–2783. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0214
Thornton A, Wilson AJ (2015) In search of the Darwinian Holy Trinity in cognitive evolution: comment on Croston et al. Behav Ecol 26:1460–1464. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv119
Thornton A, Isden J, Madden JR (2014) Toward wild psychometrics: linking individual cognitive differences to fitness. Behav Ecol 25:1299–1301. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru095
Vail AL, Manica A, Bshary R (2013) Referential gestures in fish collaborative hunting. Nat Commun 4:1765. doi:10.1038/ncomms2781
van Horik JO, Madden JR (2016) A problem with problem solving: motivational traits, but not cognition, predict success on novel operant foraging tasks. Anim Behav 114:189–198. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.006
van Horik JO, Langley EJG, Whiteside MA, Madden JR (2016) Differential participation in cognitive tests is driven by personality, sex, body condition and experience. Behav Process 134:22–30. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.07.001
Wass C, Denman-Brice A, Rios C et al (2012) Covariation of learning and “reasoning” abilities in mice: evolutionary conservation of the operations of intelligence. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 38:109–124. doi:10.1037/a0027355
Wilkinson A, Kuenstner K, Mueller J, Huber L (2010a) Social learning in a non-social reptile (Geochelone carbonaria). Biol Lett 6:614–616. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0092
Wilkinson A, Mandl I, Bugnyar T, Huber L (2010b) Gaze following in the red-footed tortoise (Geochelone carbonaria). Anim Cogn 13:765–769. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0320-2
Woodley of Menie MA, Fernandes HBF, Hopkins WD (2015) The more g-loaded, the more heritable, evolvable, and phenotypically variable: homology with humans in chimpanzee cognitive abilities. Intelligence 50:159–163. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.002
Funding
RCS was funded by a Marsden Fast-Start grant from the Royal Society of New Zealand (Grant number VUW1304).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaw, R.C., Schmelz, M. Cognitive test batteries in animal cognition research: evaluating the past, present and future of comparative psychometrics. Anim Cogn 20, 1003–1018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1135-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1135-1