Abstract
The translocation of proteins across membranes is a fundamental cellular function. Bacteria have evolved a striking array of pathways for delivering proteins into or across cytoplasmic membranes and, when present, outer membranes. Translocated proteins can form part of the membrane landscape, reside in the periplasmic space situated between the inner and outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria, deposit on the cell surface, or be released to the extracellular milieu or injected directly into target cells. One protein translocation system, the general secretory pathway, is conserved in all domains of life. A second, the twin-arginine translocation pathway, is also phylogenetically distributed among most bacteria and plant chloroplasts. While all cell types have evolved additional systems dedicated to the translocation of protein cargoes, the number of such systems in bacteria is now known to exceed nine. These dedicated protein translocation systems, which include the types 1 through 9 secretion systems (T1SSs–T9SSs), the chaperone–usher pathway, and type IV pilus system, are the subject of this review. Most of these systems were originally identified and have been extensively characterized in Gram-negative or diderm (two-membrane) species. It is now known that several of these systems also have been adapted to function in Gram-positive or monoderm (single-membrane) species, and at least one pathway is found only in monoderms. This review briefly summarizes the distinctive mechanistic and structural features of each dedicated pathway, as well as the shared properties, that together account for the broad biological diversity of protein translocation in bacteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Green ER, Mecsas J (2016) Bacterial secretion systems: an overview. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0012-2015
Gerlach RG, Hensel M (2007) Protein secretion systems and adhesins: the molecular armory of Gram-negative pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol 297:401–415
Berks BC (2015) The twin-arginine protein translocation pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 84:843–864
Tsirigotaki A, De Geyter J, Sostaric N, Economou A, Karamanou S (2017) Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:21–36
Costa TR, Felisberto-Rodrigues C, Meir A, Prevost MS, Redzej A et al (2015) Secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria: structural and mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:343–359
Galan JE, Waksman G (2018) Protein-injection machines in bacteria. Cell 172:1306–1318
Oikonomou CM, Jensen GJ (2019) Electron cryotomography of bacterial secretion systems. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0019-2018
Bernstein HD (2019) Type V secretion in Gram-negative bacteria. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0031-2018
Fan E, Chauhan N, Udatha DB, Leo JC, Linke D (2016) Type V secretion systems in bacteria. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0009-2015
Nash ZM, Cotter PA (2019) Bordetella filamentous hemagglutinin, a model for the two-partner secretion pathway. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0024-2018
Henderson IR, Nataro JP (2001) Virulence functions of autotransporter proteins. Infect Immun 69:1231–1243
Oomen CJ, van Ulsen P, van Gelder P, Feijen M, Tommassen J et al (2004) Structure of the translocator domain of a bacterial autotransporter. EMBO J 23:1257–1266
van den Berg B (2010) Crystal structure of a full-length autotransporter. J Mol Biol 396:627–633
Ruiz-Perez F, Henderson IR, Leyton DL, Rossiter AE, Zhang Y et al (2009) Roles of periplasmic chaperone proteins in the biogenesis of serine protease autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae. J Bacteriol 191:6571–6583
Ieva R, Bernstein HD (2009) Interaction of an autotransporter passenger domain with BamA during its translocation across the bacterial outer membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19120–19125
Pavlova O, Peterson JH, Ieva R, Bernstein HD (2013) Mechanistic link between beta barrel assembly and the initiation of autotransporter secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E938–E947
Albenne C, Ieva R (2017) Job contenders: roles of the beta-barrel assembly machinery and the translocation and assembly module in autotransporter secretion. Mol Microbiol 106:505–517
Kang’ethe W, Bernstein HD (2013) Charge-dependent secretion of an intrinsically disordered protein via the autotransporter pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E4246–E4255
Velarde JJ, Nataro JP (2004) Hydrophobic residues of the autotransporter EspP linker domain are important for outer membrane translocation of its passenger. J Biol Chem 279:31495–31504
Baclayon M, Ulsen P, Mouhib H, Shabestari MH, Verzijden T et al (2016) Mechanical unfolding of an autotransporter passenger protein reveals the secretion starting point and processive transport intermediates. ACS Nano 10:5710–5719
Besingi RN, Chaney JL, Clark PL (2013) An alternative outer membrane secretion mechanism for an autotransporter protein lacking a C-terminal stable core. Mol Microbiol 90:1028–1045
Shen HH, Leyton DL, Shiota T, Belousoff MJ, Noinaj N et al (2014) Reconstitution of a nanomachine driving the assembly of proteins into bacterial outer membranes. Nat Commun 5:5078
Stubenrauch CJ, Lithgow T (2019) The TAM: a translocation and assembly module of the beta-barrel assembly machinery in bacterial outer membranes. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0036-2018
Bamert RS, Lundquist K, Hwang H, Webb CT, Shiota T et al (2017) Structural basis for substrate selection by the translocation and assembly module of the beta-barrel assembly machinery. Mol Microbiol 106:142–156
Hospenthal MK, Waksman G (2019) The remarkable biomechanical properties of the Type 1 chaperone-usher pilus: a structural and molecular perspective. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0010-2018
Wright KJ, Seed PC, Hultgren SJ (2007) Development of intracellular bacterial communities of uropathogenic Escherichia coli depends on type 1 pili. Cell Microbiol 9:2230–2241
Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ (2015) Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:269–284
Psonis JJ, Thanassi DG (2019) Therapeutic approaches targeting the assembly and function of chaperone-usher pili. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0033-2018
Thomas WE, Nilsson LM, Forero M, Sokurenko EV, Vogel V (2004) Shear-dependent ‘stick-and-roll’ adhesion of type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 53:1545–1557
Hung CS, Bouckaert J, Hung D, Pinkner J, Widberg C et al (2002) Structural basis of tropism of Escherichia coli to the bladder during urinary tract infection. Mol Microbiol 44:903–915
Jacob-Dubuisson F, Striker R, Hultgren SJ (1994) Chaperone-assisted self-assembly of pili independent of cellular energy. J Biol Chem 269:12447–12455
Sauer FG, Futterer K, Pinkner JS, Dodson KW, Hultgren SJ et al (1999) Structural basis of chaperone function and pilus biogenesis. Science 285:1058–1061
Choudhury D, Thompson A, Stojanoff V, Langermann S, Pinkner J et al (1999) X-ray structure of the FimC-FimH chaperone-adhesin complex from uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science 285:1061–1066
Nishiyama M, Horst R, Eidam O, Herrmann T, Ignatov O et al (2005) Structural basis of chaperone-subunit complex recognition by the type 1 pilus assembly platform FimD. EMBO J 24:2075–2086
Remaut H, Tang C, Henderson NS, Pinkner JS, Wang T et al (2008) Fiber formation across the bacterial outer membrane by the chaperone/usher pathway. Cell 133:640–652
Remaut H, Rose RJ, Hannan TJ, Hultgren SJ, Radford SE et al (2006) Donor-strand exchange in chaperone-assisted pilus assembly proceeds through a concerted beta strand displacement mechanism. Mol Cell 22:831–842
Allen WJ, Phan G, Waksman G (2012) Pilus biogenesis at the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Curr Opin Struct Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2012.02.001
Morrissey B, Leney AC, Toste Rego A, Phan G, Allen WJ et al (2012) The role of chaperone-subunit usher domain interactions in the mechanism of bacterial pilus biogenesis revealed by ESI-MS. Molec Cell Proteom 11(M111):015289
Huang Y, Smith BS, Chen LX, Baxter RH, Deisenhofer J (2009) Insights into pilus assembly and secretion from the structure and functional characterization of usher PapC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7403–7407
Phan G, Remaut H, Wang T, Allen WJ, Pirker KF et al (2011) Crystal structure of the FimD usher bound to its cognate FimC-FimH substrate. Nature 474:49–53
Werneburg GT, Henderson NS, Portnoy EB, Sarowar S, Hultgren SJ et al (2015) The pilus usher controls protein interactions via domain masking and is functional as an oligomer. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22:540–546
Li Q, Ng TW, Dodson KW, So SS, Bayle KM et al (2010) The differential affinity of the usher for chaperone-subunit complexes is required for assembly of complete pili. Mol Microbiol 76:159–172
Labigne-Roussel A, Schmidt MA, Walz W, Falkow S (1985) Genetic organization of the afimbrial adhesin operon and nucleotide sequence from a uropathogenic Escherichia coli gene encoding an afimbrial adhesin. J Bacteriol 162:1285–1292
Gaastra W, Svennerholm AM (1996) Colonization factors of human enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Trends Microbiol 4:444–452
Titball RW, Howells AM, Oyston PC, Williamson ED (1997) Expression of the Yersinia pestis capsular antigen (F1 antigen) on the surface of an aroA mutant of Salmonella typhimurium induces high levels of protection against plague. Infect Immun 65:1926–1930
Stubenrauch C, Belousoff MJ, Hay ID, Shen HH, Lillington J et al (2016) Effective assembly of fimbriae in Escherichia coli depends on the translocation assembly module nanomachine. Nat Microbiol 1:16064
Bhoite S, van Gerven N, Chapman MR, Remaut H (2019) Curli biogenesis: bacterial amyloid assembly by the Type VIII secretion pathway. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0037-2018
Dueholm MS, Albertsen M, Otzen D, Nielsen PH (2012) Curli functional amyloid systems are phylogenetically widespread and display large diversity in operon and protein structure. PLoS ONE 7:e51274
Kikuchi T, Mizunoe Y, Takade A, Naito S, Yoshida S (2005) Curli fibers are required for development of biofilm architecture in Escherichia coli K-12 and enhance bacterial adherence to human uroepithelial cells. Microbiol Immunol 49:875–884
Hufnagel DA, Depas WH, Chapman MR (2015) The biology of the Escherichia coli extracellular matrix. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0014-2014
Tukel C, Raffatellu M, Humphries AD, Wilson RP, Andrews-Polymenis HL et al (2005) CsgA is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium that is recognized by Toll-like receptor 2. Mol Microbiol 58:289–304
Van Gerven N, Van der Verren SE, Reiter DM, Remaut H (2018) The role of functional amyloids in bacterial virulence. J Mol Biol 430:3657–3684
Hung C, Zhou Y, Pinkner JS, Dodson KW, Crowley JR et al (2013) Escherichia coli biofilms have an organized and complex extracellular matrix structure. MBio 4:e00645-00613
Chapman MR, Robinson LS, Pinkner JS, Roth R, Heuser J et al (2002) Role of Escherichia coli curli operons in directing amyloid fiber formation. Science 295:851–855
Evans ML, Chorell E, Taylor JD, Aden J, Gotheson A et al (2015) The bacterial curli system possesses a potent and selective inhibitor of amyloid formation. Mol Cell 57:445–455
Robinson LS, Ashman EM, Hultgren SJ, Chapman MR (2006) Secretion of curli fibre subunits is mediated by the outer membrane-localized CsgG protein. Mol Microbiol 59:870–881
Goyal P, Krasteva PV, Van Gerven N, Gubellini F, Van den Broeck I et al (2014) Structural and mechanistic insights into the bacterial amyloid secretion channel CsgG. Nature 516:250–253
Nenninger AA, Robinson LS, Hammer ND, Epstein EA, Badtke MP et al (2011) CsgE is a curli secretion specificity factor that prevents amyloid fibre aggregation. Mol Microbiol 81:486–499
Van Gerven N, Goyal P, Vandenbussche G, De Kerpel M, Jonckheere W et al (2014) Secretion and functional display of fusion proteins through the curli biogenesis pathway. Mol Microbiol 91:1022–1035
Hammer ND, McGuffie BA, Zhou Y, Badtke MP, Reinke AA et al (2012) The C-terminal repeating units of CsgB direct bacterial functional amyloid nucleation. J Mol Biol 422:376–389
Nenninger AA, Robinson LS, Hultgren SJ (2009) Localized and efficient curli nucleation requires the chaperone-like amyloid assembly protein CsgF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:900–905
Dunstan RA, Hay ID, Wilksch JJ, Schittenhelm RB, Purcell AW et al (2015) Assembly of the secretion pores GspD, Wza and CsgG into bacterial outer membranes does not require the Omp85 proteins BamA or TamA. Mol Microbiol 97:616–629
Korotkov KV, Sandkvist M (2019) Architecture, function, and substrates of the Type II secretion system. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0034-2018
Cianciotto NP, White RC (2017) Expanding role of Type II secretion in bacterial pathogenesis and beyond. Infect Immun 85:e00014–e00017. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00014-17
Ferrandez Y, Condemine G (2008) Novel mechanism of outer membrane targeting of proteins in Gram-negative bacteria. Mol Microbiol 69:1349–1357
East A, Mechaly AE, Huysmans GHM, Bernarde C, Tello-Manigne D et al (2016) Structural basis of pullulanase bembrane binding and secretion revealed by X-ray crystallography, molecular dynamics and biochemical analysis. Structure 24:92–104
Sauvonnet N, Vignon G, Pugsley AP, Gounon P (2000) Pilus formation and protein secretion by the same machinery in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 19:2221–2228
Korotkov KV, Sandkvist M, Hol WG (2012) The type II secretion system: biogenesis, molecular architecture and mechanism. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:336–351
Hay ID, Belousoff MJ, Lithgow T (2017) Structural Basis of Type 2 secretion system engagement between the inner and outer bacterial membranes. MBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01344-17
Majewski DD, Worrall LJ, Strynadka NC (2018) Secretins revealed: structural insights into the giant gated outer membrane portals of bacteria. Curr Opin Struct Biol 51:61–72
Lopez-Castilla A, Thomassin JL, Bardiaux B, Zheng W, Nivaskumar M et al (2017) Structure of the calcium-dependent type 2 secretion pseudopilus. Nat Microbiol 2:1686–1695
Nouwen N, Ranson N, Saibil H, Wolpensinger B, Engel A et al (1999) Secretin PulD: association with pilot PulS, structure, and ion-conducting channel formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8173–8177
Hoang HH, Nickerson NN, Lee VT, Kazimirova A, Chami M et al (2011) Outer membrane targeting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa proteins shows variable dependence on the components of Bam and Lol machineries. MBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00246-11
Camberg JL, Sandkvist M (2005) Molecular analysis of the Vibrio cholerae type II secretion ATPase EpsE. J Bacteriol 187:249–256
Sandkvist M (2001) Biology of type II secretion. Mol Microbiol 40:271–283
McCallum M, Burrows LL, Howell PL (2019) The dynamic structures of the type IV pilus. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0006-2018
Craig L, Forest KT, Maier B (2019) Type IV pili: dynamics, biophysics and functional consequences. Nat Rev Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0195-4
Ellison CK, Dalia TN, Vidal Ceballos A, Wang JC, Biais N et al (2018) Retraction of DNA-bound type IV competence pili initiates DNA uptake during natural transformation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat Microbiol 3:773–780
Clausen M, Jakovljevic V, Sogaard-Andersen L, Maier B (2009) High-force generation is a conserved property of type IV pilus systems. J Bacteriol 191:4633–4638
Ellison CK, Kan J, Dillard RS, Kysela DT, Ducret A et al (2017) Obstruction of pilus retraction stimulates bacterial surface sensing. Science 358:535–538
Zollner R, Cronenberg T, Maier B (2019) Motor properties of PilT-independent type 4 pilus retraction in gonococci. J Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00778-18
Muschiol S, Aschtgen MS, Nannapaneni P, Henriques-Normark B (2019) Gram-positive type IV pili and competence. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0011-2018
Kirn TJ, Bose N, Taylor RK (2003) Secretion of a soluble colonization factor by the TCP type 4 pilus biogenesis pathway in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 49:81–92
Albers SV, Szabo Z, Driessen AJ (2006) Protein secretion in the archaea: multiple paths towards a unique cell surface. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:537–547
Chaudhury P, Quax TEF, Albers SV (2018) Versatile cell surface structures of archaea. Mol Microbiol 107:298–311
Sato K, Naito M, Yukitake H, Hirakawa H, Shoji M et al (2010) A protein secretion system linked to bacteroidete gliding motility and pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:276–281
McBride MJ (2019) Bacteroidetes gliding motility and the type IX secretion system. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0002-2018
Seers CA, Slakeski N, Veith PD, Nikolof T, Chen YY et al (2006) The RgpB C-terminal domain has a role in attachment of RgpB to the outer membrane and belongs to a novel C-terminal-domain family found in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol 188:6376–6386
de Diego I, Ksiazek M, Mizgalska D, Koneru L, Golik P et al (2016) The outer-membrane export signal of Porphyromonas gingivalis type IX secretion system (T9SS) is a conserved C-terminal beta-sandwich domain. Sci Rep 6:23123
Johnston JJ, Shrivastava A, McBride MJ (2018) Untangling Flavobacterium johnsoniae gliding motility and protein secretion. J Bacteriol 200:e00362-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00362-17
Nakane D, Sato K, Wada H, McBride MJ, Nakayama K (2013) Helical flow of surface protein required for bacterial gliding motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:11145–11150
Lauber F, Deme JC, Lea SM, Berks BC (2018) Type 9 secretion system structures reveal a new protein transport mechanism. Nature 564:77–82
Glew MD, Veith PD, Chen D, Gorasia DG, Peng B et al (2017) PorV is an outer membrane shuttle protein for the type IX secretion system. Sci Rep 7:8790
Veith PD, Glew MD, Gorasia DG, Reynolds EC (2017) Type IX secretion: the generation of bacterial cell surface coatings involved in virulence, gliding motility and the degradation of complex biopolymers. Mol Microbiol 106:35–53
Nelson SS, Bollampalli S, McBride MJ (2008) SprB is a cell surface component of the Flavobacterium johnsoniae gliding motility machinery. J Bacteriol 190:2851–2857
Shrivastava A, Rhodes RG, Pochiraju S, Nakane D, McBride MJ (2012) Flavobacterium johnsoniae RemA is a mobile cell surface lectin involved in gliding. J Bacteriol 194:3678–3688
Shrivastava A, Berg HC (2015) Towards a model for Flavobacterium gliding. Curr Opin Microbiol 28:93–97
Higgins CF, Hiles ID, Salmond GP, Gill DR, Downie JA et al (1986) A family of related ATP-binding subunits coupled to many distinct biological processes in bacteria. Nature 323:448–450
Holland IB, Peherstorfer S, Kanonenberg K, Lenders M, Reimann S et al (2016) Type I protein secretion-deceptively simple yet with a wide range of mechanistic variability across the family. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0019-2015
Spitz O, Erenburg IN, Beer T, Kanonenberg K, Holland IB et al (2019) Type I secretion systems—one mechanism for all? Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0003-2018
Letoffe S, Wandersman C (1992) Secretion of CyaA-PrtB and HlyA-PrtB fusion proteins in Escherichia coli: involvement of the glycine-rich repeat domain of Erwinia chrysanthemi protease B. J Bacteriol 174:4920–4927
Lecher J, Schwarz CK, Stoldt M, Smits SH, Willbold D et al (2012) An RTX transporter tethers its unfolded substrate during secretion via a unique N-terminal domain. Structure 20:1778–1787
Sanchez-Magraner L, Viguera AR, Garcia-Pacios M, Garcillan MP, Arrondo JL et al (2007) The calcium-binding C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli alpha-hemolysin is a major determinant in the surface-active properties of the protein. J Biol Chem 282:11827–11835
Thanabalu T, Koronakis E, Hughes C, Koronakis V (1998) Substrate-induced assembly of a contiguous channel for protein export from E.coli: reversible bridging of an inner-membrane translocase to an outer membrane exit pore. EMBO J 17:6487–6496
Du D, Wang Z, James NR, Voss JE, Klimont E et al (2014) Structure of the AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump. Nature 509:512–515
Koronakis V, Sharff A, Koronakis E, Luisi B, Hughes C (2000) Crystal structure of the bacterial membrane protein TolC central to multidrug efflux and protein export. Nature 405:914–919
Balakrishnan L, Hughes C, Koronakis V (2001) Substrate-triggered recruitment of the TolC channel-tunnel during type I export of hemolysin by Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 313:501–510
Lenders MH, Weidtkamp-Peters S, Kleinschrodt D, Jaeger KE, Smits SH et al (2015) Directionality of substrate translocation of the hemolysin A type I secretion system. Sci Rep 5:12470
Smith TJ, Font ME, Kelly CM, Sondermann H, O’Toole GA (2018) An N-terminal retention module anchors the giant adhesin LapA of Pseudomonas fluorescens at the cell surface: a novel subfamily of type I secretion systems. J Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00734-17
Guo S, Stevens CA, Vance TDR, Olijve LLC, Graham LA et al (2017) Structure of a 1.5-MDa adhesin that binds its Antarctic bacterium to diatoms and ice. Sci Adv 3:e1701440
Smith TJ, Sondermann H, O’Toole GA (2018) Type 1 does the two-step: type 1 secretion substrates with a functional periplasmic intermediate. J Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00168-18
Deng W, Marshall NC, Rowland JL, McCoy JM, Worrall LJ et al (2017) Assembly, structure, function and regulation of type III secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:323–337
Diepold A, Armitage JP (2015) Type III secretion systems: the bacterial flagellum and the injectisome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370:20150020. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0020
Lara-Tejero M, Galan JE (2019) The injectisome, a complex nanomachine for protein injection into mammalian cells. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0039-2018
McDermott JE, Corrigan A, Peterson E, Oehmen C, Niemann G et al (2011) Computational prediction of type III and IV secreted effectors in gram-negative bacteria. Infect Immun 79:23–32
Anderson DM, Schneewind O (1997) A mRNA signal for the type III secretion of Yop proteins by Yersinia enterocolitica. Science 278:1140–1143
Niemann GS, Brown RN, Mushamiri IT, Nguyen NT, Taiwo R et al (2013) RNA type III secretion signals that require Hfq. J Bacteriol 195:2119–2125
Lee SH, Galan JE (2004) Salmonella type III secretion-associated chaperones confer secretion-pathway specificity. Mol Microbiol 51:483–495
Deng W, Yu HB, Li Y, Finlay BB (2015) SepD/SepL-dependent secretion signals of the type III secretion system translocator proteins in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 197:1263–1275
Radics J, Konigsmaier L, Marlovits TC (2014) Structure of a pathogenic type 3 secretion system in action. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:82–87
Hu B, Lara-Tejero M, Kong Q, Galan JE, Liu J (2017) In situ molecular architecture of the Salmonella type III secretion machine. Cell 168(1065–1074):e1010
Park D, Lara-Tejero M, Waxham MN, Li W, Hu B et al (2018) Visualization of the type III secretion mediated Salmonella-host cell interface using cryo-electron tomography. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39514
Zhu S, Schniederberend M, Zhitnitsky D, Jain R, Galan JE et al (2019) In situ structures of polar and lateral flagella revealed by cryo-electron tomography. J Bacteriol 201:e00117–e00119. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00117-19
Lara-Tejero M, Kato J, Wagner S, Liu X, Galan JE (2011) A sorting platform determines the order of protein secretion in bacterial type III systems. Science 331:1188–1191
Hu B, Morado DR, Margolin W, Rohde JR, Arizmendi O et al (2015) Visualization of the type III secretion sorting platform of Shigella flexneri. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:1047–1052
Akeda Y, Galan JE (2005) Chaperone release and unfolding of substrates in type III secretion. Nature 437:911–915
Wagner S, Konigsmaier L, Lara-Tejero M, Lefebre M, Marlovits TC et al (2010) Organization and coordinated assembly of the type III secretion export apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:17745–17750
Kuhlen L, Abrusci P, Johnson S, Gault J, Deme J et al (2018) Structure of the core of the type III secretion system export apparatus. Nat Struct Mol Biol 25:583–590
Schraidt O, Marlovits TC (2011) Three-dimensional model of Salmonella’s needle complex at subnanometer resolution. Science 331:1192–1195
Hu J, Worrall LJ, Hong C, Vuckovic M, Atkinson CE et al (2018) Cryo-EM analysis of the T3S injectisome reveals the structure of the needle and open secretin. Nat Commun 9:3840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06298-8
Epler CR, Dickenson NE, Bullitt E, Picking WL (2012) Ultrastructural analysis of IpaD at the tip of the nascent MxiH type III secretion apparatus of Shigella flexneri. J Mol Biol 420:29–39
Li YG, Hu B, Christie PJ (2019) Biological and structural diversity of type IV secretion systems. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0012-2018
Lang S, Zechner EL (2012) General requirements for protein secretion by the F-like conjugation system R1. Plasmid. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plasmid.2011.12.014
Redzej A, Ilangovan A, Lang S, Gruber CJ, Topf M et al (2013) Structure of a translocation signal domain mediating conjugative transfer by type IV secretion systems. Mol Microbiol 89:324–333
de la Cruz F, Frost LS, Meyer RJ, Zechner EL (2010) Conjugative DNA metabolism in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Micro Rev 34:18–40
Cascales E, Christie PJ (2003) The versatile bacterial type IV secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 1:137–150
Gonzalez-Rivera C, Bhatty M, Christie PJ (2016) Mechanism and function of type IV secretion during infection of the human host. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0024-2015
Souza DP, Oka GU, Alvarez-Martinez CE, Bisson-Filho AW, Dunger G et al (2015) Bacterial killing via a type IV secretion system. Nat Commun 6:6453. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7453
Nas MY, White RC, DuMont AL, Lopez AE, Cianciotto NP (2019) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia encodes a VirB/D4 type IV secretion system that modulates apoptosis in human cells and promotes competition against heterologous bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00457-19
Ghigo JM (2001) Natural conjugative plasmids induce bacterial biofilm development. Nature 412:442–445
Arutyunov D, Frost LS (2013) F conjugation: back to the beginning. Plasmid 70:18–32
Christie PJ, Atmakuri K, Krishnamoorthy V, Jakubowski S, Cascales E (2005) Biogenesis, architecture, and function of bacterial type IV secretion systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:451–485
Fronzes R, Schafer E, Wang L, Saibil HR, Orlova EV et al (2009) Structure of a type IV secretion system core complex. Science 323:266–268
Chandran V, Fronzes R, Duquerroy S, Cronin N, Navaza J et al (2009) Structure of the outer membrane complex of a type IV secretion system. Nature 462:1011–1015
Low HH, Gubellini F, Rivera-Calzada A, Braun N, Connery S et al (2014) Structure of a type IV secretion system. Nature 508:550–553
Chetrit D, Hu B, Christie PJ, Roy CR, Liu J (2018) A unique cytoplasmic ATPase complex defines the Legionella pneumophila type IV secretion channel. Nat Microbiol 3:678–686
Hu B, Khara P, Song L, Lin AS, Frick-Cheng AE et al (2019) In situ molecular architecture of the Helicobacter pylori Cag type IV secretion System. MBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00849-19
Sgro GG, Costa TR, Cenens W, Souza DP, Cassago A et al (2018) CryoEM structure of the core complex of a bacterial killing type IV secretion system. Nat Microbiol 3(12):1429–1440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0262-z
Jakubowski SJ, Kerr JE, Garza I, Krishnamoorthy V, Bayliss R et al (2009) Agrobacterium VirB10 domain requirements for type IV secretion and T pilus biogenesis. Mol Microbiol 71:779–794
Spudich GM, Fernandez D, Zhou XR, Christie PJ (1996) Intermolecular disulfide bonds stabilize VirB7 homodimers and VirB7/VirB9 heterodimers during biogenesis of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-complex transport apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7512–7517
Fernandez D, Spudich GM, Zhou XR, Christie PJ (1996) The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB7 lipoprotein is required for stabilization of VirB proteins during assembly of the T-complex transport apparatus. J Bacteriol 178:3168–3176
Gonzalez-Rivera C, Khara P, Awad D, Patel R, Li YG et al (2019) Two pKM101-encoded proteins, the pilus-tip protein TraC and Pep, assemble on the Escherichia coli cell surface as adhesins required for efficient conjugative DNA transfer. Mol Microbiol 111:96–117
Atmakuri K, Cascales E, Christie PJ (2004) Energetic components VirD4, VirB11 and VirB4 mediate early DNA transfer reactions required for bacterial type IV secretion. Mol Microbiol 54:1199–1211
Cabezon E, Sastre JI, de la Cruz F (1997) Genetic evidence of a coupling role for the TraG protein family in bacterial conjugation. Mol Gen Genet 254:400–406
Gomis-Ruth FX, Moncalian G, Perez-Luque R, Gonzalez A, Cabezon E et al (2001) The bacterial conjugation protein TrwB resembles ring helicases and F1-ATPase. Nature 409:637–641
Cascales E, Christie PJ (2004) Definition of a bacterial type IV secretion pathway for a DNA substrate. Science 304:1170–1173
Bhatty M, Laverde Gomez JA, Christie PJ (2013) The expanding bacterial type IV secretion lexicon. Res Microbiol 164:620–639
Burns DL (2003) Type IV transporters of pathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 6:29–34
Locht C, Coutte L, Mielcarek N (2011) The ins and outs of pertussis toxin. FEBS J 278:4668–4682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08237.x
Grohmann E, Christie PJ, Waksman G, Backert S (2018) Type IV secretion in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 107:455–471
Arends K, Celik EK, Probst I, Goessweiner-Mohr N, Fercher C et al (2013) TraG encoded by the pIP501 type IV secretion system is a two domain peptidoglycan degrading enzyme essential for conjugative transfer. J Bacteriol 195(19):4436–4444. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.02263-12
Laverde Gomez JA, Bhatty M, Christie PJ (2014) PrgK, a multidomain peptidoglycan hydrolase, is essential for conjugative transfer of the pheromone-responsive plasmid pCF10. J Bacteriol 196:527–539
Bhatty M, Cruz MR, Frank KL, Gomez JA, Andrade F et al (2015) Enterococcus faecalis pCF10-encodes surface proteins PrgA, PrgB (aggregation substance) and PrgC contribute to plasmid transfer, biofilm formation and virulence. Mol Microbiol 95:660–677
Zoued A, Brunet YR, Durand E, Aschtgen MS, Logger L et al (2014) Architecture and assembly of the type VI secretion system. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843:1664–1673
Taylor NMI, van Raaij MJ, Leiman PG (2018) Contractile injection systems of bacteriophages and related systems. Mol Microbiol 108:6–15
Alcoforado Diniz J, Liu YC, Coulthurst SJ (2015) Molecular weaponry: diverse effectors delivered by the Type VI secretion system. Cell Microbiol 17:1742–1751
Coyne MJ, Comstock LE (2019) Type VI secretion systems and the gut microbiota. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0009-2018
Russell AB, Hood RD, Bui NK, LeRoux M, Vollmer W et al (2011) Type VI secretion delivers bacteriolytic effectors to target cells. Nature 475:343–347
Sana TG, Flaugnatti N, Lugo KA, Lam LH, Jacobson A et al (2016) Salmonella typhimurium utilizes a T6SS-mediated antibacterial weapon to establish in the host gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E5044–E5051
Durand E, Cambillau C, Cascales E, Journet L (2014) VgrG, Tae, Tle, and beyond: the versatile arsenal of Type VI secretion effectors. Trends Microbiol 22:498–507
Russell AB, Peterson SB, Mougous JD (2014) Type VI secretion system effectors: poisons with a purpose. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:137–148
Wang T, Si M, Song Y, Zhu W, Gao F et al (2015) Type VI secretion system transports Zn2+ to combat multiple stresses and host immunity. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005020
Si M, Zhao C, Burkinshaw B, Zhang B, Wei D et al (2017) Manganese scavenging and oxidative stress response mediated by type VI secretion system in Burkholderia thailandensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E2233–E2242
Lin J, Zhang W, Cheng J, Yang X, Zhu K et al (2017) A Pseudomonas T6SS effector recruits PQS-containing outer membrane vesicles for iron acquisition. Nat Commun 8:14888. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14888
Saak CC, Gibbs KA (2016) The self-identity protein IdsD Is communicated between cells in swarming Proteus mirabilis colonies. J Bacteriol 198:3278–3286
Cascales E (2008) The type VI secretion toolkit. EMBO Rep 9:735–741
Shneider MM, Buth SA, Ho BT, Basler M, Mekalanos JJ et al (2013) PAAR-repeat proteins sharpen and diversify the type VI secretion system spike. Nature 500:350–353
Brunet YR, Zoued A, Boyer F, Douzi B, Cascales E (2015) The type VI secretion TssEFGK-VgrG phage-like baseplate Is recruited to the TssJLM membrane complex via multiple contacts and serves as assembly platform for tail tube/sheath polymerization. PLoS Genet 11:e1005545
Leiman PG, Basler M, Ramagopal UA, Bonanno JB, Sauder JM et al (2009) Type VI secretion apparatus and phage tail-associated protein complexes share a common evolutionary origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4154–4159
Cherrak Y, Rapisarda C, Pellarin R, Bouvier G, Bardiaux B et al (2018) Biogenesis and structure of a type VI secretion baseplate. Nat Microbiol 3:1404–1416
Rapisarda C, Cherrak Y, Kooger R, Schmidt V, Pellarin R et al (2019) In situ and high-resolution cryo-EM structure of a bacterial type VI secretion system membrane complex. EMBO J 38(10):e100886. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018100886
Kudryashev M, Wang RY, Brackmann M, Scherer S, Maier T et al (2015) Structure of the type VI secretion system contractile sheath. Cell 160:952–962
Wang J, Brackmann M, Castano-Diez D, Kudryashev M, Goldie KN et al (2017) Cryo-EM structure of the extended type VI secretion system sheath-tube complex. Nat Microbiol 2:1507–1512
Brackmann M, Wang J, Basler M (2018) Type VI secretion system sheath inter-subunit interactions modulate its contraction. EMBO Rep 19:225–233
Kapitein N, Bonemann G, Pietrosiuk A, Seyffer F, Hausser I et al (2013) ClpV recycles VipA/VipB tubules and prevents non-productive tubule formation to ensure efficient type VI protein secretion. Mol Microbiol 87:1013–1028
Unterweger D, Kostiuk B, Pukatzki S (2017) Adaptor proteins of type VI secretion system effectors. Trends Microbiol 25:8–10
Silverman JM, Agnello DM, Zheng H, Andrews BT, Li M et al (2013) Haemolysin coregulated protein is an exported receptor and chaperone of type VI secretion substrates. Mol Cell 51:584–593
Groschel MI, Sayes F, Simeone R, Majlessi L, Brosch R (2016) ESX secretion systems: mycobacterial evolution to counter host immunity. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:677–691
Pallen MJ (2002) The ESAT-6/WXG100 superfamily—and a new Gram-positive secretion system? Trends Microbiol 10:209–212
Renshaw PS, Lightbody KL, Veverka V, Muskett FW, Kelly G et al (2005) Structure and function of the complex formed by the tuberculosis virulence factors CFP-10 and ESAT-6. EMBO J 24:2491–2498
Brodin P, de Jonge MI, Majlessi L, Leclerc C, Nilges M et al (2005) Functional analysis of early secreted antigenic target-6, the dominant T-cell antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, reveals key residues involved in secretion, complex formation, virulence, and immunogenicity. J Biol Chem 280:33953–33959
Poulsen C, Panjikar S, Holton SJ, Wilmanns M, Song YH (2014) WXG100 protein superfamily consists of three subfamilies and exhibits an alpha-helical C-terminal conserved residue pattern. PLoS ONE 9:e89313
Fortune SM, Jaeger A, Sarracino DA, Chase MR, Sassetti CM et al (2005) Mutually dependent secretion of proteins required for mycobacterial virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10676–10681
Champion PA, Stanley SA, Champion MM, Brown EJ, Cox JS (2006) C-terminal signal sequence promotes virulence factor secretion in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 313:1632–1636
Daleke MH, Ummels R, Bawono P, Heringa J, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM et al (2012) General secretion signal for the mycobacterial type VII secretion pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:11342–11347
Ekiert DC, Cox JS (2014) Structure of a PE-PPE-EspG complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals molecular specificity of ESX protein secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:14758–14763
Houben EN, Korotkov KV, Bitter W (2014) Take five—type VII secretion systems of Mycobacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843:1707–1716
Burton B, Dubnau D (2010) Membrane-associated DNA transport machines. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000406
Coros A, Callahan B, Battaglioli E, Derbyshire KM (2008) The specialized secretory apparatus ESX-1 is essential for DNA transfer in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol Microbiol 69:794–808
Derbyshire KM, Gray TA (2014) Distributive conjugal transfer: new insights into horizontal gene transfer and genetic exchange in mycobacteria. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MGM2-0022-2013
Serafini A, Pisu D, Palu G, Rodriguez GM, Manganelli R (2013) The ESX-3 secretion system is necessary for iron and zinc homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 8:e78351
Siegrist MS, Unnikrishnan M, McConnell MJ, Borowsky M, Cheng TY et al (2009) Mycobacterial Esx-3 is required for mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18792–18797
Siegrist MS, Steigedal M, Ahmad R, Mehra A, Dragset MS et al (2014) Mycobacterial Esx-3 requires multiple components for iron acquisition. MBio 5:e01073-01014
Lai LY, Lin TL, Chen YY, Hsieh PF, Wang JT (2018) Role of the Mycobacterium marinum ESX-1 secretion system in sliding motility and biofilm formation. Front Microbiol 9:1160
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Grants R01GM48746, R35GM131892).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christie, P.J. The Rich Tapestry of Bacterial Protein Translocation Systems. Protein J 38, 389–408 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-019-09862-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-019-09862-3