Abstract
Understanding the influence of large and small-scale heterogeneity on species distribution and abundance is one of the major foci of landscape ecology research in fragmented environments. Although a large number of studies have addressed this issue individually, little effort has been made to synthesize the vast amount of literature published in the last decade. We reviewed 122 focal patch studies on 954 species published between 1998 and 2009 to determine the probability of species responding significantly to landscape, patch, and within-patch variables. We assessed the influence of taxonomic, life history, and methodological variables on probability of response to these 3 levels. Species in diverse taxa responded at high rates to factors at all three levels, suggesting that a multi-level approach is often necessary for understanding species response in patchy systems. Mammals responded at particularly high rates to landscape variables and therefore may benefit more than other taxa from landscape-level conservation efforts in fragmented environments. The probability of detecting a species response to landscape context, patch, and within-patch factors was influenced by a variety of methodological aspects of the studies such as type of landscape metric used, type of response variable, and sample size. Study design issues rarely are discussed by authors as reasons why a particular study did not find an effect of a variable, but should be given more consideration in future studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks SC, Finlayson GR, Lawson SJ, Lindenmayer DB, Paetkau D, Ward SJ, Taylor AC (2005) The effects of habitat fragmentation due to forestry plantation establishment on the demography and genetic variation of a marsupial carnivore, Antechinus agilis. Biol Conserv 122:581–597
Belisle M, Desrochers A (2002) Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models. Landscape Ecol 17:219–231
Bender D, Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2003) Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes. Landscape Ecol 18:17–39
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JS (2008) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24(3):127–135
Boscolo D, Metzger JP (2009) Is bird incidence in Atlantic forest fragments influenced by landscape patterns at multiple scales? Landscape Ecol 24:907–918
Carbone C, Cowlishaw G, Isaac NJB, Rowcliffe JM (2005) How far do animals go? Determinants of day range in mammals. Am Nat 165(2):290–297
Christman MC (2008) Statistical modeling of observation data with spatial dependencies. J Wildl Manag 72:22–33
Churchill JL, Hannon SJ (2010) Off-territory movement of male American Redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla) in a fragmented agricultural landscape is related to song rate, mating status and access to females. J Ornithol 151:33–44
Cooper CB, Walters JR (2002) Independent effects of woodland loss and fragmentation on Brown Treecreeper distribution. Biol Conserv 105:1–10
Cushman SA, McGarigal K (2002) Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species–environment relationships. Landscape Ecol 17:637–646
Cushman SA, McGarigal K (2004a) Hierarchical analysis of forest bird species–environment relationships in the Oregon coast range. Ecol Appl 14:1090–1105
Cushman SA, McGarigal K (2004b) Patterns in the species–environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables. Oikos 105:117–124
Cushman SA, McGarigal K, Neel MC (2008a) Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality, and consistency. Ecol Indic 8:691–703
Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Flather CH, McGarigal K (2008b) Do forest community types provide a sufficient basis to evaluate biological diversity? Front Ecol Environ 6(1):13–17
Dunning JB (2007) CRC handbook of avian body masses, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515
Fletcher RJ, Hutto RL (2008) Partitioning the multi-scale effects of human activity on the occurrence of riparian forest birds. Landscape Ecol 23:727–739
Fraser GS, Stutchbury BJM (2004) Area-sensitive forest birds move extensively among forest patches. Biol Conserv 118:377–387
Grand J, Cushman SA (2003) A multi-scale analysis of species–environment relationships: breeding birds in a pitch pine–scrub oak (Pinus rigida–Quercus ilicifolia) community. Biol Conserv 112:307–317
Grand J, Mello MJ (2004) A multi-scale analysis of species–environment relationships: rare moths in a pitch pine-scrub oak (Pinus rigida–Quercus ilicifolia) community. Biol Conserv 119:495–506
Hannah D, Woinarski JCZ, Catterall CP, Mccosker JC, Thurgate NY, Fensham RJ (2007) Impacts of clearing, fragmentation and disturbance on the bird fauna of Eucalypt savanna woodlands in central Queensland, Australia. Austral Ecol 32:261–276
Haskell JP, Ritchie ME, Olff H (2002) Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges. Nature 418:527–530
Hedges LV, Olkin I (1980) Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. Psychol Bull 88:359–369
Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York
Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Newton I, Sparks TH (1995) Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. J Avian Biol 26(2):94–104
Holland GJ, Bennett AF (2009) Differing responses to landscape change: implications for small mammal assemblages in forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 18:2997–3016
Kadoya T, Suda S, Tsubaki Y, Washitani I (2008) The sensitivity of dragonflies to landscape structure differs between life-history groups. Landscape Ecol 23:149–158
Klingbeil BT, Willig MR (2009) Guild-specific responses of bats to landscape composition and configuration in fragmented Amazonian rainforest. J Appl Ecol 46:203–213
Kolozsvary MB, Swihart RK (1999) Habitat fragmentation and the distribution of amphibians: patch and landscape correlates in farmland. Can J Zool 77:1288–1299
Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673
Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967
Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72:445–463
Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change. Island Press, Washington
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberber O (2006) SAS for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
Mac Nally R (2000) Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between—and reconciliation of—“predictive” and explanatory models. Biodivers and Conserv 9:655–671
Mazerolle MJ, Villard M (1999) Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictors of species presence and abundance: a review. Ecoscience 6:117–124
McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12:335–345
Michalski F, Peres CA (2007) Disturbance-mediated mammal persistence and abundance–area relationships in Amazonian forest fragments. Conserv Biol 21:1626–1640
Moilanen A, Nieminen M (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83:1131–1145
Mortelliti A (2010) Experimental design and taxonomic scope of fragmentation studies on European mammals: current status and future priorities. Mammal Rev 40(2):125–154
Nielsen SE, Haughland DL, Bayne E, Schieck J (2009) Capacity of large-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring programmes to detect trends in species prevalence. Biodivers and Conserv 18:2961–2978
Nowak RM (1999) Walker’s mammals of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD, Holt RD (1999a) Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology 80:1105–1117
Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Goldberg DE (1999b) Meta-analysis in ecology: concepts, statistics, and applications. Ecology 80:1103–1104
Ottaviani D, Cairns SC, Oliverio M, Boitani L (2006) Body mass as a predictive variable of home-range size among Italian mammals and birds. J Zool 269:317–330
Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. PNAS 105:20770–20775
Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Reid FA (1997) A field guide to the mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York
Renfrew RB, Ribic CA (2008) Multi-scale models of grassland passerine abundance in a fragmented system in Wisconsin. Landscape Ecol 23:181–193
Robertson OJ, Radford JQ (2009) Gap-crossing decisions of forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Austral Ecol 34:435–446
Sallabanks R, Riggs RA, Cobb LE, Dodson SW (2006) Bird-habitat relationships in grand fir forests of the Blue Mountains, Oregon. For Sci 52:489–502
SAS (2008) SAS for Windows, Version 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA
Schooley RL, Branch LC (2009) Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogenetiy and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal. Ecol Appl 19:1708–1722
Sunquist M, Sunquist F (2002) Wild cats of the world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Thompson CM, McGarigal K (2002) The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York (USA). Landscape Ecol 17:569–586
Thornton DH, Branch LC, Sunquist ME (2011) Passive sampling effects and landscape location alter the relationship between species traits and vulnerability to fragmentation. Ecol Appl 21(3). doi:10.1890/10-0549.1
Tischendorf L, Bender D, Fahrig L (2003) Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs. generalist dispersers. Landscape Ecol 18:41–50
Turner MG (2005) Landscape ecology in North America: past, present, and future. Ecology 86:1967–1974
Ward D, Pepler D, Botha R (2008) The influence of sample size on the determination of population trends in the vulnerable Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni overwintering in South Africa. Ostrich 79:199–204
Watling JI, Donnelly MA (2006) Fragments as islands: a synthesis of faunal responses to habitat patchiness. Conserv Biol 20:1016–1025
Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, Guisan A (2008) Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib 14:763–773
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Thornton for assistance with literature searches and data collection. We thank Mary Christman for assistance with statistical analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thornton, D.H., Branch, L.C. & Sunquist, M.E. The influence of landscape, patch, and within-patch factors on species presence and abundance: a review of focal patch studies. Landscape Ecol 26, 7–18 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9549-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9549-z