Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Public opinion for sale: The role of policy marketers in Greater Yellowstone policy conflict

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article develops a macro-level theory of framing to explain the intractable or ‘icked’ nature of environmental policy. Using conflict in the Greater Yellowstone Area (GYA) as a case study, we review how proposed solutions – technical, scientific, and economic – and cultural issues often lead to inadequate policy solutions. We then propose that interest groups, the media, and elected officials do not act solely as linkage mechanisms, but, rather, as policy marketers who market public opinion to citizens. The macro-level trends of a marketing culture in tandem with the rise of consumerism are explored in the context of GYA politics. Finally, we describe how our proposed macro-level theory of framing points to a rich research agenda for empirically testing questions about issue framing, policy marketers, and public opinion formation in environmental policy conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achter, P. J. (2004). ‘TV, technology, and McCarthyism: Crafting the democratic renaissance in an age of fear’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 90: 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baden, J. A. and D. Leal (eds.). (1990). The Yellowstone Primer: Land and Resource Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschta, R. L. (2003). ‘Cottonwoods, elk, and wolves in the Lamar Valley of Yellowstone National Park’, Ecological Applications 13: 1295–1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, T. (1990). ‘Men, elk, and wolves’, in John A. Baden and Donald Leal, eds., The Yellowstone Primer: Land and Resource Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, C. (2001). ‘Social capital and political fantasy: Robert Putnam's bowling alone’, Theory and Society 30: 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, T. A. and J. M. Wondolleck (2003). ‘When irresolvable becomes resolvable: The quincy library group conflict’, in Roy J. Lewicki, Barbara Gray, and Michael Elliot, eds., Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts. Washington: Island Press, pp. 126–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffalo Field Campaign. (2003). ‘Vaccination Program,’ Accessed on August 24, 2004.

  • Burns, C. (1995). ‘Statement of Hon. Conrad Burns, U.S. Senator from Montana. Yellowstone National Park Bison’, Hearings before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Parks, Historic Preservation, and Recreation, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, July 29, Helena, Montana.

  • Chase, A. (1987). Playing God in Yellowstone. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. and S. C. Minta (1994). Greater Yellowstone's Future. Moose, Wyoming: Homestead Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, R. S. and M. K. McBeth (2001). Public Policy Praxis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. H. (1999). ‘Clearing the air: Four propositions about property rights and environmental protection’, Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 10: 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. (1998). ‘What's all of this ‘noise' about noise,’ Blue Ribbon Magazine, February, http://www.sharetrails.org/mag/feb98/story4.htm Accessed on March 29, 2005.

  • Cowan, D. (1997). ‘Yellowstone Park: Speedway or sanctuary?’, The Greater Yellowstone Report, Fall 1997.

  • Cromley, C. M. (2002). ‘Bison management in Greater Yellowstone,’ in Ronald D. Brunner, Christine H. Colburn, Christina M. Cromley, Roberta A. Klein, and Elizabeth A. Olsen, eds., Finding Common Ground. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 126–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, R. and L. Weschler (2002). ‘Theory and public administration student/practitioner’, Public Administration Review 62: 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. S., J. W. Templeton, T. A. Ficht, J. D. Williams, J. D. Kopec and L. G. Adams (1990). ‘Brucella Abortus in captive bison. I. Serology, bacteriology, pathogenesis, and transmission to cattle’, Journal of Wildlife Disease 26: 360–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defenders of Wildlife (2004). ‘The Bailey Wildlife Foundation Wolf Compensation Trust’. http://www.defenders.org/wildlife Accessed on August 24, 2004.

  • Easton, D. (1965). Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2003). ‘Tests show some sleds getting dirtier’, Post Register, http://www.postregister.com. Accessed on September 3, 2003.

  • Ferguson, G. (2003). Hawk's Rest: A Season in the Remote Heart of Yellowstone. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Duke, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. J. and H. T. Miller (1996). Postmodern Public Administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. C. and R. R. Myers (1941). ‘The conflict of values and the stages of a social problem’, reprinted in Earl Rubington and Martin S. Weinberg, eds., The Study of Social Problems, 4th ed. New York: Anchor Books Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2004). ‘Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 14: 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2003). ‘Framing of environmental disputes’, in Roy J. Lewicki, Barbara Gray, and Michael Elliot, eds., Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts. Washington: Island Press, pp. 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, V. (2004). ‘Time for positive spin to snowmobile ruling’, Letter to the editor. West Yellowstone News, January 4, 2004, p. 4.

  • Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition (2004). ‘Fact sheet – wolf reintroduction in the United States’, http://www.usa4id.com/wolf_factsheet.html. Accessed on August, 24, 2004.

  • Jenkins-Smith, H. and P. A. Sabatier (eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., B. Gray and M. Elliot (2003). Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. (2004). ‘How bison and elk populations impact park visitation: A comparison of results from a survey and a historic visitation regression model’, Society and Natural Resources 17: 941–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. and L. Caughlan (2004). ‘Linking intended visitation to regional economic impact models of bison and elk management,’ Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9: 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, L. (2000). The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, M. K., E. A. Shanahan and M. D. Jones (2005). ‘The science of storytelling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone’, Society and Natural Resources 18: 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. T. (2002). Postmodern Public Policy. State University of New York Press.

  • Milner, M. (2004). Freaks, Geeks, and Cool Kids: American Teenagers, Schools, and the Culture of Consumption. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooij, M. K. (2004). Consumer Behavior and Culture: Consequences for Global Marketing and Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service (2000). ‘Air quality concerns related to snowmobile usage in national parks’, U.S. Department of Interior. National Park Service: Air Resources Division. Denver, Colorado.

  • Naughton-Treves, L., R. Grossberg and A. Treves (2003). ‘Paying for tolerance: Rural citizens' attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation’, Conservation Biology 17: 1500–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, M. (2003). ‘Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict’, Policy Sciences 36: 307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • No Author (2004). ‘Snowmobile firms can survive’, Denver Post, January 17, 2004, http://www.lexisnexus.com. Accessed on July 1, 2004.

  • No Author (2003a). ‘Washington, DC judge cancels compromise plan: Snowmobiles in park reduced by half … next year: None’, West Yellowstone News. December 26, 2003. p. 1.

  • No Author (2003b). ‘Snowmobiles in Yellowstone: A collection of recent opinions and observations’, West Yellowstone News, December 26, 2003. p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompe, J. J. and J. R. Rinehart (2002). Environmental Conflict: In Search of Common Ground. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, T. M. and R. N. Barrett (2001). Post-Cowboy Economics: Pay and Prosperity in the New American West. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, J. A. (1999). Preserving Yellowstone's Natural Conditions: Science and the Perception of Nature. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racicot, M. (1997). ‘Governor's Statement on Diseased Bison’, State of Montana document.

  • Ripple, W. J., E. J. Larsen, R. A. Renkin and D. W. Smith (2001). ‘Trophic cascades among wolves, elk, and aspen on Yellowstone National Park's northern range’, Biological Conservation 102: 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J. and M. Webber (1973). ‘Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. A. (1993). Kill the Cowboy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, T. (1995). Crime Talk: How Citizens Construct a Social Problem. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (1997). Consumer Culture and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2002). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, R. L. (1990). ‘Rescuing Yellowstone from politics: Expanding parks while reducing conflict’, in John A. Baden and Donald Leal, eds., The Yellowstone Primer: Land and Resource Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, pp. 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. P. (1992). Our Limits Transgressed: Environmental Political Thought in America. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, J. and W. Frasure (1998). ‘Culture wars on the frontier: Interests, values, and policy narratives in public lands politics’, in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett Loomis, eds., Interest Group Politics. Washington: CQ Press, pp. 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States House of Representatives (2003). ‘Republican Rush Holt, Republican Christopher Shays and Senators Call on National Park Service to Protect Yellowstone from Snowmobiles’, Press Release, March 6, http://www.house.gov. Accessed on September 19, 2004.

  • Wiant, F. M. (2002). ‘Exploiting factional discourse: Wedge issues in contemporary American political campaigns’, Southern Communication Journal 67: 276–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, T. (2004). ‘Rancher in a pickle over truth, wolves’, Jackson Hole News and Guide. August 18, p. 6A.

  • Wilson, M. (1997). ‘The wolf in Yellowstone: Science, symbol or politics?’, Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Society and Natural Resources 10: 453–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books, pp. 357–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, J. H. (2001). Sense and Non-Sense: American Culture & Politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. (2001). ‘Review of Robert D. Putnam, bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 12: 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Idaho State University, USA

    Mark K. Mcbeth

  2. Montana State University, USA

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan

Authors
  1. Mark K. Mcbeth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth A. Shanahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mcbeth, M.K., Shanahan, E.A. Public opinion for sale: The role of policy marketers in Greater Yellowstone policy conflict. Policy Sci 37, 319–338 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-8876-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-8876-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation