Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation affects reproductive success in low-density but not high-density populations of two wind-pollinated Thalictrum species

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since pollen usually travels limited distances in wind-pollinated plant species, plants growing at low density may become pollen limited. We examined how local pollen availability and population density affect reproductive success in two wind-pollinated, dioecious species, Thalictrum fendleri and Thalictrum dioicum. Distance to the nearest flowering male, the number of flowering males within 2 m, and flower number on those males served as measures of local pollen availability. Increased distance from pollen donors reduced seed set in the lowest-density population of each species, but seed set in high-density populations was not correlated with local pollen availability. For plants in high- and low-density populations at similar distances from pollen donors, this distance only affected seed set in low-density populations. To ensure that differences in resource availability were not causing spurious correlations between seed set and plant density, we constructed low-density artificial arrays in populations of T. dioicum. In these, seed set decreased rapidly with increases in distance from pollen donors. Despite these effects, the density of males in a population was not correlated with average seed set in T. dioicum, and hand pollination in the T. dioicum populations also failed to increase seed set over natural levels. These results suggest that pollen receipt only limits seed set on isolated plants within low- density populations of T. dioicum and T. fendleri.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison TD (1990) Pollen production and plant density affect pollination and seed production in Taxus canadensis. Ecology 71:516–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antos JA, Allen GA (1994) Biomass allocation among reproductive structures in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis – a functional interpretation. J␣Ecol 82:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antos JA, Allen GA (1999) Patterns of reproductive effort in male and female shrubs of Oemleria cerasiformis: a 6-year study. J Ecol 87:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ågren J (1996) Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77:1779–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry PE, Calvo RN (1989) Wind pollination, self-incompatibility and altitudinal shifts in pollination systems in the High Andean genus Espeletia (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 76:1602–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P (1981) Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort. Am Nat 117:838–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch M, Waser NM (1999) Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 86:871–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch M, Waser NM (2001) Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effect on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs. Oecologia 126:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet J, Liston A (1999) The evolution of dioecy in the genus Thalictrum (meadow rue) (Ranunculaceae). International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burd M (1994) Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60:83–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden RW (1977) Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998) High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J Hered 89:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowding P (1987) Wind pollination mechanisms and aerobiology. Int Rev Cytol 107:421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom MJ (1998) Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am Nat 151:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig MA, Linder HP, Bond WJ (1992) Efficacy of wind pollination: pollen load size and natural microgametophyte populations in wind-pollinated Staberoha banksii (Restionaceae). Am J Bot 79:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ST, Lyford ME (1999) Pollen dispersal models in Quaternary plant ecology: assumptions, parameters, and prescriptions. Bot Rev 65:39–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato E, Hiura T (1999) Fruit set in Styrax obassia (Styracaceae): the effect of light availability, display size, and local floral density. Am J Bot 86:495–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp EE, Goedde MA, Rice KJ (2001) Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia 128:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1992) Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucoides (Brassicaceae). Oecologia 91:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1993) Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74:2145–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemen C (1980) Allocation of reproductive effort to the male and female strategies in wind-pollinated plants. Oecologia 45:156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evolut Biol 7:139–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers AE, Christensen NL (1986) Intraseasonal variation in seed production among flowers and plants of Thalictrum thalictroides(Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 73:190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall C, Primack RB (1987) Resources limit the fecundity of three woodland herbs. Oecologia 71:431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molano-Flores B, Hendrix SD, Heard SB (1999) The effect of population size on stigma pollen load, fruit set, and seed set in Allium stellatum Ker. (Liliaceae). Int J␣Plant Sci 160:753–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesenbaum RA (1993) Light or pollen- seasonal limitations on female reproductive success in the understory shrub Lindera benzoin. J Ecol 81:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson SG, Wästljung U (1987) Seed predation and cross-pollination in mast-seeding beech (Fagus sylvatica) patches. Ecology 68:260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regal PJ (1982) Pollination by wind and animals: ecology of geographic patterns. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:497–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll J, Mitchell RJ, Cabin RJ, Marshall DL (1997) Reproductive success increases with local density of conspecifics in a desert mustard (Lesquerella fendleri). Conserv Biol 11:738–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell SK, Schupp EW, Tepedino VJ (1998) Reproductive biology of curlleaf mountain mahogany, Cercocarpus ledifolius (Rosaceae): self-compatibility, pollen limitation, and wind pollination. Plant Species Biol 13:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steven JC, Waller DM (2004) Reproductive alternatives to insect pollination in four species of Thalictrum (Ranunculaceae). Plant Species Biol 19:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonsor SJ (1985) Leptokurtic pollen-flow, non-leptokurtic gene-flow in a wind-pollinated herb, Plantago lanceolata L. Oecologia 67:442–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead DR (1983) Wind pollination: some ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: Real L (ed), Pollination biology. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp 97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock C, Neiland R (2002) Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends Plant Sci 7:270–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Murray Clayton, Thomas Givnish, Thomas Sharkey, Linda Graham, and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and discussion on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Brian Anacker, Jeanne Sheahan, Timothy Lisko and Josh Ladwig provided assistance in the field. This study constitutes part of JS’s dissertation research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and is based upon work supported under a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship to JS and grants from the Beta Chapter of SDE-Graduate Women in Science and the J. J. Davis fund of the Botany Department at UW-Madison.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet C. Steven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steven, J.C., Waller, D.M. Isolation affects reproductive success in low-density but not high-density populations of two wind-pollinated Thalictrum species. Plant Ecol 190, 131–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9196-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9196-2

Keywords

Navigation