Skip to main content
Log in

Members of Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli represent the culturable diversity of chitinolytic bacteria in chitin-enriched soils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Culturable chitinolytic bacterial diversity was studied in chitin-rich soils collected from two industries involved in chitin production. A total of 27 chitinolytic isolates were isolated among which only 10 showed zone of clearance ≥4 mm on colloidal chitin agar plate. Using morphological, biochemical and 16S rDNA analysis, isolates were identified as Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Stenotrophomonas and Pseudomonas. Molecular phylogenetic analysis revealed that Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli were found to be the predominant classes in these chitin-enriched soils. Chitinolytic bacterial population densities were significantly high and showed a rather simple community composition dominated by genus Bacillus and Stenotrophomonas (74%). This is the first report on assessing the chitinolytic bacterial diversity of soils from industries involved in chitin production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson HJ (1990) Microbiological applications-a laboratory manual in general microbiology. WMC Brown Publishers, Boulevard

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger LR, Reynolds DM (1988) Colloidal chitin preparation. Methods Enzymol 161:140–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya D, Nagpure A, Gupta RK (2007) Bacterial chitinases: properties and potential. Crit Rev Biotechnol 27(1):21–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cody RM (1989) Distribution of chitinase and chitobiase in Bacillus. Curr Microbiol 19:201–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan MS, Bullimore J, Pretty N, Osborn AM, Ball AS (2003) Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1800–1809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Franco AC, Deobald LA, Spivak A, Crawford DL (2003) Actinobacterial chitinase like enzymes: profile of rhizosphere versus non-rhizosphere isolates. Can J Microbiol 49:683–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PH (1994) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Pub, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard MB, Ekborg AN, Weiner RM, Hutcheson SW (2003) Detection and characterization of chitinases and other chitin-modifying enzymes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30:623–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil Z, Rizk M, Saleh M, Moustafa M (2007) Isolation and identification of rhizosphere soil chitinolytic bacteria and their potential in antifungal biocontrol. Global J Mol Sci 2(2):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim HS, Timmis KN, Golyshin PN (2007) Characterization of a chitinolytic enzyme from Serratia sp. KCK isolated from kimchi juice. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:1275–1283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishore GK, Pande S, Podile AR (2005a) Phylloplane bacteria increase seedling emergence growth and yield of field-grown groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Lett Appl Microbiol 40:260–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishore GK, Pande S, Podile AR (2005b) Biological control of late leaf spot of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with chitinolytic bacteria. Phytopathology 95:1157–1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Dudley J, Nei M, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 9:299–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurita K (2006) Chitin and chitosan: functional biopolymers from marine crustaceans. Mar Biotechnol 8:203–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura T, Toyota K, Mochizuki M (2005) Predominant culturable Bacillus species in Japanese arable soils and their potential as biocontrol agents. Microb Environ 20:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen PHB, Møller J, Magid J (2008) Determination of a relationship between chitinase activity and microbial diversity in chitin amended compost. Bioresource Technol 99:4355–4359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit E, Leeflang P, Gommans S, van den Broek J, van Mill S, Wernars K (2001) Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2284–2291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tharanathan RN, Kittur FS (2003) Chitin-the undisputed biomolecules of great potential. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43:61–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Hwang J (2001) Microbial reclamation of shellfish wastes for the production of chitinases. Enzy Microb Technol 28:376–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SL, Chio SH, Chang WT (1997) Production of chitinase from shell-fish wastes by Pseudomonas aeruginosa K-187. Proc Natl Sci Counc ROC (B) 21:71–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yasir M, Aslam Z, Kim SW, Lee S, Jeon CO, Chung YR (2009) Bacterial community composition and chitinase gene diversity of vermicompost with antifungal activity. Bioresour Technol 100:4395–4403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Zhou Y, Fenf J (2007) Analysis of both chitinase and chitosanase produced by Sphingomonas sp. CJ-5. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 8:831–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support under University Grants Commission-Centre for Advanced Studies (UGC-CAS), Department of Biotechnology-Centre for Research and Education in Biology and Biotechnology (DBT-CREBB) program to the School of Life Sciences and Department of Science and Technology-Fund for Improvement of Science and Technology Infrastructure in Universities and Higher Educational Institutions (DST-FIST) programs to the Department of Plant Sciences, University of Hyderabad, and Prof. Ch. Venkata Ramana for his guidance in molecular characterization of bacterial isolates. SND and PVSRN thank DST-Centre for Nanoscience and DBT, respectively for research fellowships. We thank Dr. Domnique Gillet and Dr. Prasuna K. from Mahatani Chitosan and S. M. Agritech, respectively for providing the chitin-rich soil samples from their factory premises.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Appa Rao Podile.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, S.N., Sarma, P.V.S.R.N., Neeraja, C. et al. Members of Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli represent the culturable diversity of chitinolytic bacteria in chitin-enriched soils. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26, 1875–1881 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0369-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0369-8

Keywords

Navigation