Skip to main content
Log in

Embracing Noise in Chemical Reaction Networks

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 12 February 2019

The Original Article was published on 12 February 2019

Abstract

We provide a short review of stochastic modeling in chemical reaction networks for mathematical and quantitative biologists. We use as case studies two publications appearing in this issue of the Bulletin, on the modeling of quasi-steady-state approximations and cell polarity. Reasons for the relevance of stochastic modeling are described along with some common differences between stochastic and deterministic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Images from Xu et al. (2019) (Color figure online)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson DF, Cappelletti D (2018) Discrepancies between extinction events and boundary equilibria in reaction networks. arXiv:1809.04613 (Submitted)

  • Anderson DF, Craciun G, Kurtz TG (2010) Product-form stationary distributions for deficiency zero chemical reaction networks. Bull Math Biol 72(8):1947–1970

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DF, Enciso GA, Johnston MD (2014) Stochastic analysis of biochemical reaction networks with absolute concentration robustness. R Soc Interface 11:20130943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomay AF (1958) Stochastic models for chemical reactions. I. Theory of the unimolecular reaction process. Bull Math Biophys 20:175–190

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomay AF (1959) Stochastic models for chemical reactions. II. The unimolecular rate constant. Bull Math Biophys 21:363–373

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Benzi R, Sutera A, Vulpiani A (1999) The mechanism of stochastic resonance. J Phys A 14:L45301

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Delbrück M (1940) Statistical fluctuations in autocatalytic reactions. J Chem Phys 8(1):120–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elowitz MB, Leibler S (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403:335–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne-Manneville S (2004) Cdc42: the centre of polarity. J Cell Sci 117(8):1291–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg M (1972) Complex balancing in general kinetic systems. Arch Ration Mech Anal 49:187–194

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gagniuc PA (2017) Markov chains: from theory to implementation and experimentation. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gammaitoni L, Hänggi P, Jung P, Marchesoni F (1998) Stochastic resonance. Rev Mod Phys 70:223–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gang H, Ditzinger T, Ning CZ, Haken H (1993) Stochastic resonance without external periodic force. Phys Rev Lett 71:807–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 81(25):2340–2361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahl SK, Kremling A (2016) A comparison of deterministic and stochastic modeling approaches for biochemical reaction systems: on fixed points, means, and modes. Front Genet 7:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn FJM (1972) Necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics. Arch Ration Mech Anal 49(3):172–186

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ingalls BP (2012) Mathematical modeling in systems biology: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kang H-W, KhudaBukhsh WR, Koeppl H, Rempala GA (2019) Quasi-steady-state approximations derived from the stochastic model of enzyme kinetics. Bull Math Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-019-00574-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz TG (1972) The relationship between stochastic and deterministic models for chemical reactions. J Chem Phys 57(7):2976–2978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-C, Segel L (1988) Mathematics applied to deterministic problems in the natural sciences. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie DA (1967) Stochastic approach to chemical kinetics. J Appl Probab 4:413–478

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsson J (2005) Models of stochastic gene expression. Phys Life Rev 2(2):157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsson J, Berg OG, Ehrenberg M (2000) Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(13):7148–7153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pikovsky AS, Kurths J (1997) Coherence resonance in a noise-driven excitable system. Phys Rev Lett 78:775–778

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin-Trottier L, Lord ND, Vinnicombe G, Paulsson J (2016) Synchronous long-term oscillations in a synthetic gene circuit. Nature 538:514–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoilov M, Plyasunov S, Arkin AP (2005) Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(7):2310–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segel L, Slemrod M (1989) The quasi-steady-state assumption: a case study in perturbation. SIAM Rev 31(3):446–477

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Székely T Jr, Burrage K (2014) Stochastic simulation in systems biology. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 12(20–21):14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Holmes WR, Sosnik J, Schilling T, Nie Q (2017) Cell sorting and noise-induced cell plasticity coordinate to sharpen boundaries between gene expression domains. PLoS Comput Biol 13(1):e1005307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Jilkine A (2018) Modeling Cdc-42 oscillation in fission yeast. Biophys J 114(3):711–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Kang H-W, Jilkine A (2019) Comparison of deterministic and stochastic regime in a model for Cdc42 oscillations in fission yeast. Bull Math Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-019-00573-5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our anonymous reviewer, who contributed significantly to this manuscript, and especially for his tireless reviews of Kang et al. (2019). This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMS-1616233.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to German Enciso.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Enciso, G., Kim, J. Embracing Noise in Chemical Reaction Networks. Bull Math Biol 81, 1261–1267 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-019-00575-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-019-00575-3

Keywords

Navigation