Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

APOBEC3B high expression status is associated with aggressive phenotype in Japanese breast cancers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The members of AID/APOBEC protein family possess cytidine deaminase activity that converts cytidine residue to uridine on DNA and RNA. Recent studies have shown the possible influence of APOBEC3B (A3B) as DNA mutators of breast cancer genome. However, the clinical significance of A3B expression in Japanese breast cancer has not been studied in detail.

Methods

Ninety-three primary breast cancer tissues (74 estrogen-receptor (ER) positive, 3 ER and HER2 positive, 6 HER2 positive, and 10 triple negative) including 37 tumor-normal pairs were assessed for A3B mRNA expression using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. We analyzed the relation between A3B expression, mutation analysis of TP53 and PIK3CA by direct sequencing, polymorphic A3B deletion allele and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in tumors.

Results

A3B mRNA was overexpressed in tumors compared with normal tissue. Patients with high A3B expression were associated with subtype and progression of lymph node metastasis and pathological nuclear grade. However, the expression was not related to any other clinicopathological factors, including mutation of TP53 and PIK3CA, polymorphic A3B deletion allele, HPV infection and survival time.

Conclusion

The expression of A3B in breast cancer was higher than in non-cancerous tissues and was related to the lymph node metastasis and nuclear grade, which are reliable aggressive phenotype markers in breast cancer. Evaluation of A3B expression in tumor may be a marker for breast cancer with malignant potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou S, Diaz LA Jr, Kinzler KW. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 2013;339:1546–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Helleday T, Eshtad S, Nik-Zainal S. Mechanisms underlying mutational signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:585–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns MB, Lackey L, Carpenter MA, Rathore A, Land AM, Leonard B, et al. APOBEC3B is an enzymatic source of mutation in breast cancer. Nature. 2013;494:366–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Burns MB, Temiz NA, Harris RS. Evidence for APOBEC3B mutagenesis in multiple human cancers. Nat Genet. 2013;45:977–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mori S, Takeuchi T, Ishii Y, Kukimoto I. Identification of APOBEC3B promoter elements responsible for activation by human papillomavirus type 16 E6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;460:555–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sieuwerts AM, Willis S, Burns MB, Look MP, Gelder ME, Schlicker A, et al. Elevated APOBEC3B correlates with poor outcomes for estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancers. Horm Cancer. 2014;5:405–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhoo-Pathy N, Yip CH, Hartman M, Uiterwaal CS, Devi BC, Peeters PH, et al. Breast cancer research in Asia: adopt or adapt Western knowledge? Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:703–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maskarinec G, Sen C, Koga K, Conroy SM. Ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: status and determinants. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2011;7:677–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iqbal J, Ginsburg O, Rochon PA, Sun P, Narod SA. Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival by race and ethnicity in the United States. JAMA. 2015;313:165–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kidd JM, Newman TL, Tuzun E, Kaul R, Eichler EE. Population stratification of a common APOBEC gene deletion polymorphism. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Komatsu A, Nagasaki K, Fujimori M, Amano J, Miki Y. Identification of novel deletion polymorphisms in breast cancer. Int J Oncol. 2008;33:261–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Long J, Delahanty RJ, Li G, Gao YT, Lu W, Cai Q, et al. A common deletion in the APOBEC3 genes and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:573–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Caval V, Suspene R, Shapira M, Vartanian JP, Wain-Hobson S. A prevalent cancer susceptibility APOBEC3A hybrid allele bearing APOBEC3B 3′UTR enhances chromosomal DNA damage. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Imahashi M, Izumi T, Watanabe D, Imamura J, Matsuoka K, Ode H, et al. Lack of association between intact/deletion polymorphisms of the APOBEC3B gene and HIV-1 risk. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Li N, Bi X, Zhang Y, Zhao P, Zheng T, Dai M. Human papillomavirus infection and sporadic breast carcinoma risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:515–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huo Q, Zhang N, Yang Q. Epstein-Barr virus infection and sporadic breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Akhter J, Ali Aziz MA, Al Ajlan A, Tulbah A, Akhtar M. Breast cancer: is there a viral connection? Adv Anat Pathol. 2014;21:373–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vernet-Tomas M, Mena M, Alemany L, Bravo I, De Sanjose S, Nicolau P, et al. Human papillomavirus and breast cancer: no evidence of association in a Spanish set of cases. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:851–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Banerji S, Cibulskis K, Rangel-Escareno C, Brown KK, Carter SL, Frederick AM, et al. Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes. Nature. 2012;486:405–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bertheau P, Lehmann-Che J, Varna M, Dumay A, Poirot B, Porcher R, et al. p53 in breast cancer subtypes and new insights into response to chemotherapy. Breast. 2013;22(Suppl 2):S27–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Niikura N, Sakatani T, Arima N, Ohi Y, Honma N, Kanomata N et al. Assessment of the Ki67 labeling index: a Japanese validation ring study. Breast Cancer. 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Andrei Turtoi and all members of Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Oncology and Thoracic Visceral Organ Surgery for their helpful discussions. We also thank patients who participated in this study, and Ikuko Horikoshi and Tadashi Handa for their technical assistance. The work was supported in part by Uehara Zaidan, Promotion Plan for the Platform of Human Resource Development for Cancer and New Paradigms—Establishing Centers for Fostering Medical Researchers of the Future programs by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research (GIAR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiko Nishiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Masahiko Nishiyama received a research grant from Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuboi, M., Yamane, A., Horiguchi, J. et al. APOBEC3B high expression status is associated with aggressive phenotype in Japanese breast cancers. Breast Cancer 23, 780–788 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0641-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0641-8

Keywords

Navigation