Abstract
The cerebellum has been traditionally considered a sensory-motor structure, but more recently has been related to other cognitive and affective functions. Previous research and meta-analytic studies suggested that it could be involved in pain processing. Our aim was to distinguish the functional networks subserved by the cerebellum during pain processing. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on 12 subjects undergoing mechanical pain stimulation and resting state acquisition. For the analysis of data, we used fuzzy c-mean to cluster cerebellar activity of each participant during nociception. The mean time courses of the clusters were used as regressors in a general linear model (GLM) analysis to explore brain functional connectivity (FC) of the cerebellar clusters. We compared our results with the resting state FC of the same cluster and explored with meta-analysis the behavior profile of the FC networks. We identified three significant clusters: cluster V, involving the culmen and quadrangular lobules (vermis IV-V, hemispheres IV-V-VI); cluster VI, involving the posterior quadrangular lobule and superior semilunar lobule (hemisphere VI, crus 1, crus 2), and cluster VII, involving the inferior semilunar lobule (VIIb, crus1, crus 2). Cluster V was more connected during pain with sensory-motor areas, cluster VI with cognitive areas, and cluster VII with emotional areas. Our results indicate that during the application of mechanical punctate stimuli, the cerebellum is not only involved in sensory functions but also with areas typically associated with cognitive and affective functions. Cerebellum seems to be involved in various aspects of nociception, reflecting the multidimensionality of pain perception.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 2009;44:489–501. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039.
Saab CY, Willis WD. The cerebellum: organization, functions and its role in nociception. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003;42:85–95.
Ruscheweyh R, Kühnel M, Filippopulos F, Blum B, Eggert T, Straube A. Altered experimental pain perception after cerebellar infarction. Pain. 2014;155:1303–12. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.006.
Duerden EG, Albanese MC. Localization of pain-related brain activation: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34:109–49. doi:10.1002/hbm.21416.
Mehack R, Torgerson WS. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology. 1971;34:50–9.
Ngamkham S, Vincent C, Finnegan L, Holden JE, Wang ZJ, Wilkie DJ. The McGill Pain Questionnaire as a multidimensional measure in people with cancer: an integrative review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012;13:27–51. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2010.12.003.
De Gagné TA, Mikail SF, D’Eon JL. Confirmatory factor analysis of a 4-factor model of chronic pain evaluation. Pain. 1995;60:195–202.
Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277–99.
Moulton EA, Schmahmann JD, Becerra L, Borsook D. The cerebellum and pain: passive integrator or active participator? Brain Res Rev. 2010;65:14–27. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.05.005.
Ito M. Bases and implications of learning in the cerebellum—adaptive control and internal model mechanism. Prog Brain Res. 2005;148:95–109.
Carrive P, Morgan MM. Periaqueductal gray. In: Paxinos G, Mai J, editors. Hum. Cent. Nerv. Syst. 2nd ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004, pp. 393–423
Benarroch EE. Periaqueductal gray: an interface for behavioral control. Neurology. 2012;78:210–7. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823fcdee.
Kong J, Loggia ML, Zyloney C, Tu P, Laviolette P, Gollub RL. Exploring the brain in pain: activations, deactivations and their relation. Pain. 2010;148:257–67. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.008.
Linnman C, Beucke J-C, Jensen KB, Gollub RL, Kong J. Sex similarities and differences in pain-related periaqueductal gray connectivity. Pain. 2012;153:444–54. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.006.
Sillery E, Bittar RG, Robson MD, Behrens TEJ, Stein J, Aziz TZ, et al. Connectivity of the human periventricular-periaqueductal gray region. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:1030–4. doi:10.3171/jns.2005.103.6.1030.
Kong J, Tu P, Zyloney C, Su T. Intrinsic functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray, a resting fMRI study. Behav Brain Res. 2010;211:215–9. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.042.
Linnman C, Moulton EA, Barmettler G, Becerra L, Borsook D. Neuroimaging of the periaqueductal gray: state of the field. Neuroimage. 2012;60:505–22. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.095.
Cauda F, Costa T, Diano M, Sacco K, Duca S, Geminiani G, et al. Massive modulation of brain areas after mechanical pain stimulation: a time-resolved fMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:2991–3005. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht153.
Mayhew SD, Hylands-White N, Porcaro C, Derbyshire SWG, Bagshaw AP. Intrinsic variability in the human response to pain is assembled from multiple, dynamic brain processes. Neuroimage. 2013;75:68–78. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.028.
Moulton E a, Pendse G, Becerra LR, Borsook D. BOLD responses in somatosensory cortices better reflect heat sensation than pain. J Neurosci. 2012;32:6024–31. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0006-12.2012.
Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97–113.
Baumgärtner U, Iannetti GD, Zambreanu L, Stoeter P, Treede R-D, Tracey I. Multiple somatotopic representations of heat and mechanical pain in the operculo-insular cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104:2863–72. doi:10.1152/jn.00253.2010.
Miezin FM, Maccotta L, Ollinger JM, Petersen SE, Buckner RL. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage. 2000;11:735–59.
Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: 3-dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. New York: Thieme; 1988.
Smolders A, De Martino F, Staeren N, Scheunders P, Sijbers J, Goebel R, et al. Dissecting cognitive stages with time-resolved fMRI data: a comparison of fuzzy clustering and independent component analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:860–8.
Bezdek JC. FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci. 1984;10:191–203.
Fadili MJ, Ruan S, Bloyet D, Mazoyer B. A multistep unsupervised fuzzy clustering analysis of fMRI time series. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;10:160–78.
Golay X, Kollias S, Stoll G, Meier D, Valavanis A, Boesiger P. A new correlation-based fuzzy logic clustering algorithm for fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:249–60.
Esposito F, Scarabino T, Hyvarinen A, Himberg J, Formisano E, Comani S, et al. Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering. Neuroimage. 2005;25:193–205.
Cauda F, Geminiani G, D’Agata F, Sacco K, Duca S, Bagshaw AP, et al. Functional connectivity of the posteromedial cortex. PLoS One 2010;5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013107
Goebel R, Esposito F, Formisano E. Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with BrainVoyager QX: from single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:392–401.
Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:636–47.
Cauda F, D’Agata F, Sacco K, Duca S, Geminiani G, Vercelli A. Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. Neuroimage. 2011;55:8–23. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.049.
Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, Nichols TE, Penny WD. Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images. vol. 8. Academic Press; 2007.
Fox PT, Lancaster JL. Opinion: mapping context and content: the BrainMap model. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:319–21.
Lancaster JL, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB, Martinez MJ, Fox PM, Fox PT. Automated regional behavioral analysis for human brain images. Front Neuroinform. 2012;6:23.
Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C, Wang LE, Zilles K, Fox PT. Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:2907–26. doi:10.1002/hbm.20718.
Fox PT, Laird AR, Fox SP, Fox PM, Uecker AM, Crank M, et al. BrainMap taxonomy of experimental design: description and evaluation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25:185–98.
Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR, Kurth F, Fox PT. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2349–61.
Kochunov P, Lancaster J, Thompson P, Toga AW, Brewer P, Hardies J, et al. An optimized individual target brain in the Talairach coordinate system. Neuroimage. 2002;17:922–7.
Peyron R, Laurent B, García-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiol Clin. 2000;30:263–88.
Tölle TR, Kaufmann T, Siessmeier T, Lautenbacher S, Berthele a, Munz F, et al. Region-specific encoding of sensory and affective components of pain in the human brain: a positron emission tomography correlation analysis. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:40–7.
Veldhuijzen DS, Nemenov MI, Keaser M, Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP, Greenspan JD. Differential brain activation associated with laser-evoked burning and pricking pain: an event-related fMRI study. Pain. 2009;141:104–13. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.10.027.
Wager TD, Atlas LY, Lindquist MA, Roy M, Woo C-W, Kross E. An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1388–97. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1204471.
Coghill RC, Sang CN, Maisog JM, Iadarola MJ. Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:1934–43.
Kong J, White NS, Kwong KK, Vangel MG, Rosman IS, Gracely RH, et al. Using fMRI to dissociate sensory encoding from cognitive evaluation of heat pain intensity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:715–21. doi:10.1002/hbm.20213.
Baliki MN, Geha PY, Apkarian A V. Parsing pain perception between nociceptive representation and magnitude estimation. J Neurophysiol. 2009; 101:875–87. doi:10.1152/jn.91100.2008
Asplund CL, Todd JJ, Snyder AP, Marois R. A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:507–12. doi:10.1038/nn.2509.
Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:700–11. doi:10.1038/nrn2201.
Mobbs D, Petrovic P, Marchant JL, Hassabis D, Weiskopf N, Seymour B, et al. When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans. Science. 2007;317:1079–83. doi:10.1126/science.1144298.
Craig AD. Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1225:72–82. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05990.x.
Mesmoudi S, Perlbarg V, Rudrauf D, Messe A, Pinsard B, Hasboun D, et al. Resting state networks’ corticotopy: the dual intertwined rings architecture. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67444.
Bernard JA, Seidler RD, Hassevoort KM, Benson BL, Welsh RC, Wiggins JL, et al. Resting state cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity networks: a comparison of anatomical and self-organizing map approaches. Front Neuroanat. 2012;6. doi:10.3389/fnana.2012.00031
Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Castellanos A, Diaz JC, Yeo BTT. The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 2011; 106:2322–45. doi:10.1152/jn.00339.2011
Habas C, Kamdar N, Nguyen D, Prater K, Beckmann CF, Menon V, et al. Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks. J Neurosci. 2009;29:8586–94. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1868-09.2009.
Krienen FM, Buckner RL. Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2485–97. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp135.
Stoodley CJ, Valera EM, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2011;59:1560–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.065.
Legrain V, Iannetti GD, Plaghki L, Mouraux A. The pain matrix reloaded: a salience detection system for the body. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;93:111–24. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.005.
Simons LE, Moulton EA, Linnman C, Carpino E, Becerra L, Borsook D. The human amygdala and pain: evidence from neuroimaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:527–38. doi:10.1002/hbm.22199.
Moulton EA, Pendse G, Schmahmann J, Becerra L, Borsook D. Aversion-related circuitry in the cerebellum: responses to noxious heat and unpleasant images. J Neurosci. 2011;31:3795–804. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6709-10.2011.
Baumann O, Mattingley JB. Functional topography of primary emotion processing in the human cerebellum. Neuroimage. 2012;61:805–11. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.044.
Sacchetti B, Scelfo B, Strata P. Cerebellum and emotional behavior. Neuroscience. 2009;162:756–62. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.01.064.
Schienle A, Scharmüller W. Cerebellar activity and connectivity during the experience of disgust and happiness. Neuroscience. 2013;246:375–81. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.048.
Stoodley CJ, Valera EM, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2012;59:1560–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.065.
Adamaszek M, D’Agata F, Kirkby KC, Trenner MU, Sehm B, Steele CJ, et al. Impairment of emotional facial expression and prosody discrimination due to ischemic cerebellar lesions. Cerebellum. 2014;13:338–45. doi:10.1007/s12311-013-0537-0.
Damasio AR. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996;351:1413–20. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank the reviewers for the help and the precious suggestions. Also, we would like to thank Dr. Rebecca Watson for her useful comments on the final revision of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
M. Diano and F. D’Agata contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 206 kb)
ESM 2
(PDF 108 kb)
ESM 3
(PDF 109 kb)
ESM 4
(PDF 107 kb)
ESM 5
(PDF 106 kb)
ESM 6
(PDF 106 kb)
ESM 7
(PDF 107 kb)
ESM 8
(PDF 109 kb)
ESM 9
(PDF 111 kb)
ESM 10
(PDF 107 kb)
ESM 11
(PDF 114 kb)
ESM 12
(PDF 54 kb)
ESM 13
(PDF 27 kb)
ESM 14
(PDF 34 kb)
ESM 15
(PDF 29 kb)
ESM 16
(PDF 29 kb)
ESM 17
(PDF 27 kb)
ESM 18
(PDF 33 kb)
ESM 19
(PDF 29 kb)
ESM 20
(PDF 24 kb)
ESM 21
(PDF 26 kb)
ESM 22
(PDF 27 kb)
ESM 23
(PDF 30 kb)
ESM 24
(PDF 28 kb)
ESM 25
(PDF 25 kb)
ESM 26
(PDF 38 kb)
ESM 27
(PDF 40 kb)
ESM 28
(PDF 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diano, M., D’Agata, F., Cauda, F. et al. Cerebellar Clustering and Functional Connectivity During Pain Processing. Cerebellum 15, 343–356 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-015-0706-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-015-0706-4