Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: Models of intermediate complexity

https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(76)90022-8Get rights and content

Abstract

A family of one-level differential-equation competition models in which two populations are limited by the energy flowing into the system generates the following results. For competitors on the same and only resource: 1) Purely exploitative competition leads to exclusion; which species wins depends on relative abilities to appropriate and extract energy from the resource, and the relative death and maintenance rates. 2) If conspecific interference (e.g., deaths or energy loss from fighting, cannibalism, or display) is sufficiently high relative to abilities to exploit the common resource, competition for the same resource can lead to coexistence. 3) If heterospecific interference is sufficiently high relative to abilities to exploit the common resource, competition for the same resource can lead to a priority effect, in which the outcome depends on initial population sizes. 4) Depending on whether situation (2) or (3) prevails, an increase in the amount of the common resource can convert an outcome in which one species always wins into one giving coexistence (2) or a priority effect (3). 5) If species are similar to one another in their abilities to appropriate and extract energy from the common resource and show reciprocity in intererence costs, competition can have multiple outcomes; either one species wins or the species coexist, depending on initial values.

For competition on the same resource, but with each species monopolizing an exclusive resource as well: 1) Purely exploitative competition always leads to a unique point coexistence. 2) If interference is added to the system described in (1), two points of coexistence, separated by a saddle (an “unstable equilibrium”) are possible. This is favored by a) a small yield from the exclusive resources relative to the common one; and b) strong interspecific relative to intraspecific interference.

References (30)

  • R.A. Armstrong et al.

    Coexistence of two competitors on one resource

    J. Theor. Biol

    (1975)
  • A.C. Chombie

    Further experiments in insect competition

  • G.F. Gause

    The Struggle for Existence

    (1934)
  • M.E. Gilpin et al.

    Global models of growth and competition

  • J.B.C. Jackson et al.

    Allelopathy and spatial competition among coral reef invertebrates

  • Cited by (159)

    • Indirect taxis drives spatio-temporal patterns in an extended Schoener's intraguild predator–prey model

      2022, Applied Mathematics Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      We consider Schoener’s type predator–prey model [1] describing so called intraguild predation in which both predator and prey exploit competitively a common food resource which is available at some constant rate and shared between the predator and the prey.

    • Competition delays multi-drug resistance evolution during combination therapy

      2021, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The different strains compete for the same resources, such that the growth of any one strain is limited by the presence of all strains. This leads to competitive Lotka-Volterra equations (Schoener, 1976). We provide detailed mathematical definitions for each of the three scenarios below.

    • Pattern formation in predator prey systems with consuming resource and prey-taxis

      2021, Applied Mathematics Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      In [1], Holt and Polis proposed that predator and prey may also compete for the same resources, for example, a predator killing or eating prey may use the same foods of those prey. The mixture of competition and predation represents the intraguild predation (IGP) that also appears in many important ecology problems (see [2]). It happens that the combination of predation and competition can display limit cycles or chaotic dynamics.

    • A widespread interaction between generalist and specialist enemies: The role of intraguild predation and Allee effect

      2021, Applied Mathematical Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, weak competition between the IG predator and IG prey is also an essential component of IGP which is required for their coexistence [25]. Some theoretical evidences also suggest changes in the equilibrium conditions for species coexistence by transforming a purely competitive or predator-prey interaction to IGP interaction [7,19,26–28]. The direction and frequency of an IGP are influenced by relative body size, brood size, growth rates, life span, reproductive phenology of interacting species, degree of trophic specialization and other life history traits [10].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text