Adaptation to gratings: No compensatory advantages found

doi:10.1016/0042-6989(76)90241-8

Vision Research

Volume 16, Issue 10, 1976, Pages 1043-1045

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(76)90241-8 Get rights and content

Abstract

Psychophysical measurements were made following adaptation to gratings in order to test the hypothesis that adaptation to patterned features of visual stimulation serves a function analogous to the changes in retinal function during light and dark adaptation. No improvements in detecting changes of spatial frequency, orientation or contrast were found.

Reference (9)

AndrewsD.P.
Error-correcting perceptual mechanisms
Q. Jl exp. Psychol.
(1964)
BarlowH.B. et al.
Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina
J. Physiol., Lond.
(1969)
BlakemoreC. et al.
On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images
J. Physiol., Lond.
(1969)
BlakemoreC. et al.
Perceptual fading of a stabilized cortical image
Nature, Lond.
(1973)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (59)

Contrast adaptation improves spatial integration
2021, Vision Research
Citation Excerpt :
Interestingly, for the observer who initially did not improve in the Wilson & Humanski (1993) experiment, increasing the stimulus spatial frequency, which allowed for more spatial integration, resulted in some discrimination enhancement with a high base contrast. Barlow et al. (1976), using grating stimuli, found that adaptation had no effect on contrast discrimination at high base contrasts. However, Barlow measured discrimination either by using vertically split-field contrasts, which required only local discrimination around the vertical central line, or by detecting the point in time when a change in contrast occurred, which can be viewed as a change-detection task.
The effects of contrast adaptation and contrast area summation (spatial integration) were investigated using a contrast discrimination task. The task consisted of a target of variable size, and a pedestal with a fixed base contrast. Discrimination performance was examined for a condition in which the pedestal size was fixed, equal to the largest target size, and for a condition in which the pedestal size matched the target size and thus varied with it. Repeated performance of the task produced rapid within-session improvements for both conditions. For stimuli with a matching size of target and pedestal, the performance improved only for the larger targets, indicating the development of spatial integration, which was initially absent for these stimuli. However, the improvements were mostly temporary, and were not fully retained between subsequent daily sessions. The temporary nature of the sensitivity gains implies that they resulted, at least in part, from rapid adaptation to the stimulus contrast. We suggest that adaptation decorrelates and thus reduces the spatial noise generated by a high-contrast pedestal, leading to improved spatial integration (area summation) and better contrast sensitivity. A decorrelation model successfully predicted our experimental results.
The effect of perceptual contour orientation uncertainty on the tilt aftereffect
2019, Vision Research
Citation Excerpt :
Contrast discrimination, for example, has sometimes been found to improve after adaptation (Abbonizio, Langley, & Clifford, 1998; Greenlee & Heitger, 1988), and sometimes it has been found to remain unchanged (Maatanen & Koenderink, 1991; Ross, Speed, & Morgan, 1993). Orientation discrimination likewise has been shown to improve (Regan & Beverley, 1985), remain unchanged (Barlow, Macleod, & van Meeteren, 1976), or worsen (Clifford, Wyatt, Arnold, Smith, & Wenderoth, 2001) following adaptation (for a review, see Clifford, 2002). In the present experiments, positive TAEs indicated that, following adaptation, there was a bias in orientation judgments away from the true orientation, while an increase in sigma indicated that orientation discrimination worsened.
The tilt aftereffect (TAE) occurs when, after adapting to an oriented line, a vertical line appears to be tilted in the opposite direction. The magnitude of the TAE has been shown to relate to the salience of the adapting stimulus (e.g., its contrast) as well as to the similarity between the adapting and testing stimuli. However, the relationship between TAE and orientation uncertainty – variability in the perceived orientation of the stimulus – of either the adapting or the testing stimulus and, more importantly, change in orientation uncertainty as a function of adaptation have not previously been explored. We manipulated stimulus salience by using a variety of contour types, including real and illusory contours. Tilt aftereffects were observed even for stimuli that had much weaker or invisible illusory contours. Orientation uncertainty of the adapting stimulus, as measured by the slope of a psychometric function in orientation discrimination, was positively correlated with TAE magnitude for real and illusory contours, but not for stimuli with weak contour percepts. On an individual subject level, orientation uncertainty increased post-adaptation and was correlated with pre-adaptation uncertainty. That is, individuals with more variability in their perception of orientation before adaptation showed increased variability in orientation discrimination following adaptation. This may account for some of the variability in TAE across individuals and stimulus types and is consistent with previous findings on increased orientation discrimination thresholds post-adaptation for nearby orientations.
Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces
2010, Vision Research
Adaptation is a fundamental property of perceptual processing. In low-level vision, it can calibrate perception to current inputs, increasing coding efficiency and enhancing discrimination around the adapted level. Adaptation also occurs in high-level vision, as illustrated by face aftereffects. However, the functional consequences of face adaptation remain uncertain. Here we investigated whether adaptation can enhance identification performance for faces from an adapted, relative to an unadapted, population. Five minutes of adaptation to an average Asian or Caucasian face reduced identification thresholds for faces from the adapted relative to the unadapted race. We replicated this interaction in two studies, using different participants, faces and adapting procedures. These results suggest that adaptation has a functional role in high-level, as well as low-level, visual processing. We suggest that adaptation to the average of a population may reduce responses to common properties shared by all members of the population, effectively orthogonalizing identity vectors in a multi-dimensional face space and freeing neural resources to code distinctive properties, which are useful for identification.
Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face
2007, Vision Research
Adaptation paradigms highlight the dynamic nature of face coding and suggest that identity is coded relative to an average face that is tuned by experience. In low-level vision, adaptive coding can enhance sensitivity to differences around the adapted level. We investigated whether sensitivity to differences around the average face is similarly enhanced. Converging evidence from three paradigms showed no enhancement. Discrimination of small interocular spacing differences was not better for faces close to the average (Study 1). Nor was perceived similarity reduced for face pairs close to (spanning) the average (Study 2). On the contrary, these pairs were judged most similar. Maximum likelihood perceptual difference scaling (Studies 3 and 4) confirmed that sensitivity to differences was reduced, not enhanced, around the average. We conclude that adaptive face coding does not enhance discrimination around the average face.
Efficient neural codes naturally emerge through gradient descent learning
2022, Nature Communications
Control of visual adaptation depends upon task
2020, PLoS ONE

View all citing articles on Scopus

¹: Present address: Physiological Laboratory, Cambridge CB2 3EG, England.

²: Present address: Psychology Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, CA 92037 U.S.A.

³: Present address: Institute for Perception TNO, Soesterberg, Kampweg 5, Postbus 23, The Netherlands.

View full text

Adaptation to gratings: No compensatory advantages found

Abstract

Error-correcting perceptual mechanisms

Q. Jl exp. Psychol.

Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina

J. Physiol., Lond.

On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images

J. Physiol., Lond.

Perceptual fading of a stabilized cortical image

Nature, Lond.