Visually evoked eye movements in the mouse (Mus musculus)
Reference (10)
Movements of the eyes
Reconsideration of the oculomotor pathway
Spaltlampenmikroscopie und Ophthalmoskopie am Auge von Ratte und Maus
Documenta ophth.
(1951)- et al.
Optokinetic response of the guinea pig
J. comp. physiol. Psychol.
(1969) - et al.
Abnormal electroretinograms in visual mutants ofDrosophila
Nature, Lond.
(1969)
Cited by (39)
A system to measure the Optokinetic and Optomotor response in mice
2015, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsCitation Excerpt :These patterns can be painted or projected onto the inner surface of card board, plastic or wood cylinders as previously described for OKR or OMR experiments in mice (Thaung et al., 2002; Mitchiner et al., 1976; Mangini et al., 1985; Schmucker et al., 2005) and other species (Easter and Nicola, 1996; Beck et al., 2004), generating a complete 360° image at a homogeneous distance from the animal. Centering in the horizontal plane can be achieved by restraining the animal (Stahl et al., 2000; Mangini et al., 1985; Mitchiner et al., 1976) when measuring OKR. When measuring OMR, the freely moving animal can alter its distance to the walls of the physical cylinder, and therefore the perceived spatial frequency of the objects presented on the wall.
Automated measurement of spectral sensitivity of motion vision during optokinetic behavior
2012, NeurocomputingCitation Excerpt :Several approaches regarding the presentation of the stimulus-pattern (mostly in a so called “optokinetic drum”) have been developed during the last 40 years. In early studies, a simple paper cylinder with a printed-on stripe pattern was physically turned around the animal by a motor [7,16]. Nowadays, OKR stimulation of fish (e.g. zebrafish larvae) is done by projection of PC generated images on a cylindrical diffusion screen [24].
A preformed scleral search coil for measuring mouse eye movements
2010, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsCitation Excerpt :Unfortunately, methods used by basic scientists to study mouse eye movements require time-consuming and delicate surgery (Stahl et al., 2000) or result in highly variable eye movements that require extensive statistical manipulation and estimation in order reflect the actual eye movement (van Alphen et al., 2001). While eye movement measurement in mice has come a long way since simple observation (Mitchiner et al., 1976) initial improvements were inherently noisy and inconsistent (electro-oculography; e.g., Grusser-Cornehls and Bohm, 1988) or painstaking (video tape; e.g., Mangini et al., 1985). Even modern techniques like the scleral search coil (Fuchs and Robinson, 1966) or high-speed video recording (e.g., Sakatani and Isa, 2004) have not been easily adapted to recording mouse eye movements.
Quantitative analysis of spontaneous saccade-like rapid eye movements in C57BL/6 mice
2007, Neuroscience ResearchThe optomotor response: A robust first-line visual screening method for mice
2005, Vision Research