Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(86)90038-9Get rights and content

Abstract

None of the current electrical audiometric procedures, alone or in combination, has yet achieved the precision of conventional audiometric testing that is used to assess hearing in verbally capable children and adults. The reason for this, in part, lies in the use of stimuli which have a wide frequency content. We have measured scalp potentials which follow the envelopes of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: a frequency-specific stimulus. In normal subjects such amplitude-modulation following responses (AMFRs) appear to be generated by two sources. One source has a latency of about 30 ms, generates large responses and is only observed at modulations below 55 Hz, while the other source has a latency of 7–9 ms, generates smaller responses, and is only observed at modulations from 100–350 Hz. The latencies of these two sources are consistent with origins in the cortex and midhrain. respectively. We examined AMFRs to low frequency (50 Hz) modulations as a possible audiometric tool. In normal subjects, the amplitude of the AMFR increased as a function of intensity, decreased as a function of carrier frequency, and could be evoked across the whole audiometric range (250–8000 Hz). In hearing-impaired subjects, the AMFR amplitudes as a function of carrier frequency accurately reflected the pattern of hearing loss on a frequency-by-frequency basis. In most subjects, the threshold for evoking the AMFR was within 0–25 dB of hearing threshold. It therefore appears that the AMFR may be a potentially useful tool to assess hearing in those unable to undergo conventional audiometric testing.

References (34)

  • O. Creutzfeldt et al.

    Thalamocortical transformation of responses to complex auditory stimuli

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1980)
  • H. Davis

    Brain stem and other responses in electric response audiometry

    Ann. Otolaryngol.

    (1976)
  • H. Davis

    Auditory evoked potentials

  • H. Davis et al.

    A slow brainstem response for low frequency audiometry

    Audiology

    (1979)
  • J.E. Desmedt

    Auditory Evoked Potentials in Man. Psychopharmacology Correlates of Evoked Potentials

  • J.J. Eggermont

    The inadequacy of auditory brainstem responses in audiological applications

  • H. Fletcher

    Auditory patterns

    Rev. Mod. Phys.

    (1940)
  • Cited by (214)

    • Fundamental frequency-dependent changes in vowel-evoked envelope following responses

      2021, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is because EFRs represent the summed phase-locked activity from multiple neural generators to the same envelope/modulation frequency (f0 in the case of vowels). As the envelope/modulation frequency increases, cortical contributions reduce and sub-cortical contributions increase (Herdman et al., 2002; Kuwada et al., 1986). The f0 of male-spoken vowels—most commonly used in EFR studies—ranges from about 90 to 170 Hz (Hillenbrand et al., 1995).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text