Theoretical genetics of batesian mimicry III. Evolution of dominance
References (11)
- et al.
J. theor. Biol.
(1975) - et al.
J. theor. Biol.
(1975) - et al.
Theor. Popul. Biol.
(1973) - et al.
Heredity, Lond.
(1960) - et al.
Genetics, Princeton
(1960)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (32)
Evidence for Fisher's dominance theory: How many 'special cases'?
2011, Trends in GeneticsCitation Excerpt :In addition to plant sporophytic self-incompatibility, where theoretical studies [22,23] predicted that natural selection should strongly act on dominance modifiers, and even before they were discovered [16], two other such systems have been investigated. First, codominance resulting in intermediate morphs should be counter-selected at the loci controlling Batesian mimicry in butterflies, hence allowing dominance modifiers conferring either dominance or recessivity to fix in a population [30]. Of course, the genetic basis of this genetic system was unknown at that time, but is now beginning to be deciphered at the molecular level [31–33].
Is optimal gene order impossible?
2006, Trends in GeneticsEffects of epistasis on phenotypic robustness in metabolic pathways
2003, Mathematical BiosciencesUnifying evolutionary dynamics
2002, Journal of Theoretical BiologyThe evolutionary ecology of dominance-recessivity
1999, Journal of Theoretical BiologyEvolution of the mimetic African swallowtail butterfly Papilio dardanus: Molecular data confirm relationships with P. phorcas and P. constantinus
1999, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- †
Present address: School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, Sussex.
Copyright © 1975 Published by Elsevier Ltd.