Chapter Ten - Eye Development

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(10)90010-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The vertebrate eye comprises tissues from different embryonic origins: the lens and the cornea are derived from the surface ectoderm, but the retina and the epithelial layers of the iris and ciliary body are from the anterior neural plate. The timely action of transcription factors and inductive signals ensure the correct development of the different eye components. Establishing the genetic basis of eye defects in zebrafishes, mouse, and human has been an important tool for the detailed analysis of this complex process. A single eye field forms centrally within the anterior neural plate during gastrulation; it is characterized on the molecular level by the expression of “eye-field transcription factors.” The single eye field is separated into two, forming the optic vesicle and later (under influence of the lens placode) the optic cup. The lens develops from the lens placode (surface ectoderm) under influence of the underlying optic vesicle. Pax6 acts in this phase as master control gene, and genes encoding cytoskeletal proteins, structural proteins, or membrane proteins become activated. The cornea forms from the surface ectoderm, and cells from the periocular mesenchyme migrate into the cornea giving rise for the future cornea stroma. Similarly, the iris and ciliary body form from the optic cup. The outer layer of the optic cup becomes the retinal pigmented epithelium, and the main part of the inner layer of the optic cup forms later the neural retina with six different types of cells including the photoreceptors. The retinal ganglion cells grow toward the optic stalk forming the optic nerve. This review describes the major molecular players and cellular processes during eye development as they are known from frogs, zebrafish, chick, and mice—showing also differences among species and missing links for future research. The relevance to human disorders is one of the major aspects covered throughout the review.

Introduction

The vertebrate eye is a very complex organ (Fig. 10.1) built up by the three major tissues, the cornea, the lens, and the retina. It is obvious that its formation depends on highly organized processes that take place during embryonic development, and mutations in key genes lead to severe congenital disorders. In many vertebrates, the eye is a very prominent organ in the head, and major alterations can be recognized easily. In particular for humans, the eye is one of the most important sensory systems and loss of its function causes many social handicaps and changes in personality. Therefore, the eye has provided a fascinating topic for research since decades.

There are two highlights in eye research, which changed our view fundamentally:

  • First of all, at the beginning of the last century Hans Spemann made a careful analysis of eye development: his finding of the dependence of lens induction from the underlying optic cup leads to the discovery of the basic concept of “organizers” in development biology, which became a prototype for tissue interactions in embryonic development (Spemann, 1924).

  • Later, thanks to modern genetics, the characterization of causative mutations in congenital human disorders and their comparison to mutations in various model organisms changed a central dogma in zoology, namely the independent evolution of eyes in flies and vertebrates: since the transcription factor Pax6 can induce both, rhabdomeric eyes in Drosophila as well as complex eyes in mammals (Halder et al., 1995), a common genetic network of eye development was suggested first in flies, mice, and humans and included later also frogs and fishes.

However, ongoing research activities revealed also some diversity in eye development among these organisms. This review will focus mainly on eye development in mammals and its key steps, but in some cases it will be compared also to other vertebrates such as Xenopus, zebrafish, or chick.

Section snippets

Overview of Eye Development

During gastrulation, the developing eye is organized as a single field located centrally in the developing forebrain (Adelmann, 1929) (Fig. 10.2). During establishment of the midline, the single “eye field” is separated. During neurulation, two lateral optic pits become apparent as the first signs of the developing eyes. They form when the lateral walls of the diencephalon begin to bulge out (in the mouse at embryonic day 8.5; stage with 11–13 pairs of somites). They enlarge to form half a day

Early Stage: The Eye Field

As mentioned above, the developing eye is organized during gastrulation as a single field located centrally in the developing forebrain. Failure in its formation leads to eyeless phenotypes (anophthalmia). However, if the eye field is formed, but not split into two hemispheres, it results in one single eye, a structure which is named “cyclopia”—a reference to the Cyclops people mentioned by Homer in his epic “Odyssey”; these giants had just one eye in the middle of the forehead.

Formation of the lens placode and Pax6 as its master control gene

Besides the formation of the eye field within the anterior neural plate and its splitting into the future bilateral optic vesicles, the second important step in early eye development is the formation of the lens placode in the surface ectoderm. It starts when the preplacodal region develops in the ectoderm—a transient bilateral structure exhibiting placodal competence leading finally to the anterior pituitary, olfactory neurons, the lens, inner ear, and the trigeminal and epibranchial cranial

The Cornea

Cornea forms as a result of the last series of major inductive events in eye development with the lens vesicle interacting with the overlying surface ectoderm (Fig. 10.6); finally, the cornea consists of an anterior epithelium and a posterior endothelium with the corneal stroma within between. The basis of corneal embryonic development in chick was summarized in great detail by Hay (1979).

During detaching of the lens vesicle from the surface ectoderm, the two tissues remain transiently

The Iris and the Ciliary Body

Whilst the lens and the cornea are being formed, profound changes also occur in the optic cup. The two layers of the optic cup begin to differentiate in distinct directions. The cells of the outer layer produce pigment and eventually form the pigmented layer of the retina, and the inner layer will further differentiate to the neural retina (see below/next section). The area where the developing neural and pigmental retinas meet, the outer lips of the optic cup or the margin of the optic cup, is

The retinal pigmented epithelium

The two layers of the optic cup differentiate (Fig. 10.2): the cells of the outer layer produce pigment and eventually form the RPE. This outer layer is in close contact with the periocular mesenchyme, and signals coming from these cells seem to be important for the further steps to the formation of the RPE. In zebrafish, one of these signaling molecules was identified as activin A, a member of the TGFβ family (Fuhrmann et al., 2000). By contrast, Fgf signaling from the surface ectoderm was

The Optic Nerve

At approximately 47/48 days of gestation (around E11.5 in the mouse), the optic stalk is formed as the connection between the eye and the diencephalon. The axons from the ganglion cells of the inner layer of the retina meet at the base of the eye and travel down to the optic stalk. Initially, the optic stalk represents a narrow neck that connects the optic cup to the diencephalon. Once the axons reach the optic stalk, they grow into it forming the optic nerve (∼E15.5 in the mouse) and relay the

Conclusion and Perspectives

Mutations that lead to clinically relevant phenotypes highlight important steps in eye development: some affect genes that act at the top of the regulatory hierarchy and therefore at the initial stages of eye development, the formation of the eye field. Mutations in these genes (e.g., Pax6, Sox2) lead to anophthalmia, microphthalmia, or aniridia. Other genes (FoxC1, FoxE3, Pitx3, Maf) act downstream or later during development. Some are important just for one particular tissue, for example, the

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank many friends and colleagues who have supported our work within the past years. Unfortunately, due to space limitations I could not refer to all papers dealing with molecular aspects in eye development, and I apologize to those colleagues, who have not been cited.

References (146)

  • M.R. Dias da Silva et al.

    FGF-mediated induction of ciliary body tissue in the chick eye

    Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • G. Duester

    Keeping an eye on retinoic acid signaling during eye development

    Chem.-Biol. Interact.

    (2009)
  • J.M. Fadool et al.

    Zebrafish: A model system for the study of eye genetics

    Prog. Retin. Eye Res.

    (2008)
  • P.J. Gage et al.

    The canonical wnt signaling antagonist DKK2 is an essential effector of PITX2 function during normal eye development

    Dev. Biol.

    (2008)
  • X. Geng et al.

    Haploinsufficiency of six3 fails to activate sonic hedgehog expression in the ventral forebrain and causes holoprosencephaly

    Dev. Cell

    (2008)
  • J. Graw

    Crystallins. Cataract and beyond

    Exp. Eye Res.

    (2009)
  • L. Harrington et al.

    Developmental analysis of ocular morphogenesis in αA-crystallin/diphtheria toxin transgenic mice undergoing ablation of the lens

    Dev. Biol.

    (1991)
  • H. Kurose et al.

    Expression of fibroblast growth factor 19 (fgf19) during chicken embryogenesis and eye development, compared with fgf15 expression in the mouse

    Gene Expr. Patterns

    (2004)
  • P.Y. Lwigale et al.

    Lens-derived Semaphorin3A regulates sensory innervation of the cornea

    Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • P.Y. Lwigale et al.

    Semaphorin3A/neuropilin-1 signaling acts as a molecular switch regulating neural crest migration during cornea development

    Dev. Biol.

    (2009)
  • A. Moshiri et al.

    Near complete loss of retinal ganglion cells in the math5/brn3b double knockout elicits severe reductions of other cell types during retinal development

    Dev. Biol.

    (2008)
  • R. Ohsawa et al.

    Regulation of retinal cell fate specification by multiple transcription factors

    Brain Res.

    (2008)
  • G. Oliver et al.

    Ectopic lens induction in fish in response to the murine homeobox gene six3

    Mech. Dev.

    (1996)
  • S.F. Oster et al.

    Ganglion cell axon pathfinding in the retina and optic nerve

    Sem. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2004)
  • W. Pei et al.

    Identification of common and unique modifiers of zebrafish midline bifurcation and cyclopia

    Dev. Biol.

    (2009)
  • H.B. Adelmann

    Experimental studies on the development of the eye. II. The eye-forming potencies of the urodelan neural plate (triton teniatus and amblysoma punctatum

    J. Exp. Zool.

    (1929)
  • Y. Alvarez et al.

    Genetic determinants of hyaloid and retinal vasculature in zebrafish

    BMC Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • M. Andreazzoli

    Molecular regulation of vertebrate retina cell fate

    Birth Defects Res. (Part C)

    (2009)
  • N. Azuma et al.

    Mutations of a human homologue of the drosophila eyes absent gene (EYA1) detected in patients with congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies

    Hum. Mol. Genet.

    (2000)
  • T.Y. Belenkaya et al.

    Pygopus encodes a nuclear protein essential for wingless/wnt signaling

    Development

    (2002)
  • O.E. Blacque et al.

    Bardet-Biedl syndrome: An emerging pathomechanism of intracellular transport

    Cell Mol. Life Sci.

    (2006)
  • A. Blixt et al.

    A forkhead gene, FoxE3, is essential for lens epithelial proliferation and closure of the lens vesicle

    Genes Dev.

    (2000)
  • M. Burmeister et al.

    Ocular retardation mouse caused by chx10 homeobox null allele: Impaired retinal progenitor proliferatrion and bipolar cell differentiation

    Nat. Genet.

    (1996)
  • B.M. Carlson

    Human Embryology and Developmental Biology

    (1994)
  • H.B. Chase

    Studies on an anophthalmic strain of mice. IV. A second major gene for anophthalmia

    Genetics

    (1944)
  • S.-H. Cho et al.

    Wnt2b/β-catenin-mediated canonical wnt signaling determines the peripheral fates of the chick eye

    Development

    (2006)
  • R.L. Chow et al.

    Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate

    Development

    (1999)
  • T.A. Ciulla et al.

    Antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

    Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.

    (2009)
  • A. Cvekl et al.

    Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in vertebrate eye development and disease

    Heredity.

    (2010)
  • A. Cvekl et al.

    Anterior eye development and ocular mesenchyme: New insights from mouse models and human diseases

    BioEssays

    (2004)
  • A. Cvekl et al.

    Regulation of gene expression by pax6 in ocular cells: A case of tissue-preferred expression of crystallins in lens

    Int. J. Dev. Biol.

    (2004)
  • H. Danno et al.

    Molecular links among the causative genes for ocular malformation: Otx2 and sox2 coregulate rax expression

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2008)
  • L.K. Davis et al.

    Pax6 3’ deletion results in aniridia, autism and mental retardation

    Hum. Genet.

    (2008)
  • R.U. de Iongh et al.

    WNT/frizzled signaling in eye development and disease

    Front. Biosci.

    (2006)
  • R. de Iongh et al.

    Spatio-temporal distribution of acidic and basic FGF indicates a role for FGF in rat lens morphogenesis

    Dev. Dyn.

    (1993)
  • M.A. Dyer et al.

    Prox1 function controls progenitor cell proliferation and horizontal cell genesis in the mammalian retina

    Nat. Genet.

    (2003)
  • T. Eggert et al.

    Isolation of a Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate homeobox gene Rx and its possible role in brain and eye development

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1998)
  • S.C. Faber et al.

    Bmp signaling is required for development of primary lens fiber cells

    Development

    (2002)
  • J. Favor et al.

    Relationship of pax6 activity levels to the extent of eye development in the mouse, mus musculus

    Genetics

    (2008)
  • J. Favor et al.

    Molecular characterization of Pax62Neu through Pax610Neu

    Genetics

    (2001)
  • Cited by (203)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text