Research papersAn interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains
Introduction
Optimization of the yeast cell factory for industrial applications requires a multidisciplinary effort of (molecular) geneticists, physiologists, and biochemical engineers. Each of these disciplines imposes specific requirements on the yeast strains used for experimental work. Required properties, that often seem to be noncompatible in a single strain, include high transformation efficiency, fast growth in defined mineral media under controlled conditions, high rates of respiratory growth in sugar-limited chemostat cultures, etc. (Table 1).
The conflicts of interest that may arise in selecting a suitable strain platform for multidisciplinary research are exemplified by Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 8066. This prototrophic, diploid wild-type strain has been extensively characterized with respect to its physiology [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. However, strain CBS 8066 is heterozygous for a number of auxotrophic markers and poorly transformable, which is a major complication in integrated genetic/physiological studies.
As a result of their different immediate research goals, geneticists, physiologists and biochemical engineers use a variety of S. cerevisiae strains. Even within each single discipline, a multitude of strains are studied because, for obvious reasons, a particular research group tends to adhere to the “house strain” with which previous research has been carried out. It is evident that a common reference strain, and isogenic mutants derived from it, is of great value for studies on quantitative aspects of growth and metabolism. Such studies require the use of prototrophic strains and defined mineral media. Cultivation of strains carrying auxotrophic markers requires the addition of amino acids, purine or pyrimidine bases to the medium, which complicates physiological studies [6] and in some cases obscures changes in physiological properties caused by genetic modification. For example, S. cerevisiae mutants lacking the E1α subunit of the mitochondrial pyruvate-dehydrogenase complex exhibit a partial leucine requirement [7] and mutants lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase require methionine [8]. These interesting effects would remain unnoticed in leucine/methionine auxotrophs or in complex media.
In view of the lack of consensus on the choice of a common reference strain for genetic, physiological, and engineering studies, we decided to characterize a number of laboratory strains that are currently in use in our laboratories. Emphasis was given to standard transformation tests and cultivation under well-defined conditions. The results obtained show that strains from the CEN.PK family offer an acceptable compromise between the criteria set by different research disciplines.
Section snippets
Strains
Four diploid, prototrophic laboratory strains were used in this study:
- 1.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS8066. This strain was obtained from the Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS, Delft, The Netherlands) and included because it has been extensively characterized with respect to its physiological properties [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. A drawback of this diploid strain for genetic studies is that it is heterozygous for the auxotrophic recessive alleles his4, leu1, and met2 (H.Y. Steensma and J.
Physiological tests
The maximum specific growth rate in vitamin-supplemented mineral media was determined in shake-flask cultures via optical-density measurements. To obtain an impression of the reproducibility of these assays, the specific growth rate on glucose was estimated in all our 10 laboratories. A SD of ca. 20% was obtained for data collected in the various laboratories. However, duplicate experiments performed within one laboratory generally differed by less than 5%. From the results of these shake-flask
Physiological and genetic characteristics
In comparison with many other yeasts, the range of carbon substrates that support growth of S. cerevisiae is rather narrow. Even so, not all relevant substrates have been tested in this study. For example, oleate [22] was not included, as growth on this substrate is difficult to quantify. Furthermore, from the many nitrogen sources supporting growth of S. cerevisiae strains [23], only ammonia was tested. Nevertheless, the data presented in Table 2 show that strain X2180 is inferior compared to
Requests for CEN.PK Strains
Requests for CEN.PK strains [33] should not be addressed to the authors of this paper, but to Dr. P. Kötter, Institute of Microbiology, J.W. Goethe Universität, Marie-Curie-Strasse 9, D-60439 Frankfurt, Germany (e-mail [email protected]).
Acknowledgements
This work is part of the project “From Gene to Product in Yeast: a Quantitative Approach,” which is subsidized by the European Community (EC Framework IV Cell Factory Program). We acknowledge the contributions to the experimental work of K. Bangma, D. Bolzani, M. Ehlde, P. de Jong-Gubbels, and M. Luttik and the background information on CEN.PK strains provided by Dr. P. Kötter.
References (33)
- et al.
Acoustic off-gas analyser for bioreactorsprecision, accuracy and dynamics of detection
Chem Eng Sci
(1995) - et al.
Regulation of glucose metabolism in growing yeast cells
Adv Microb Physiol
(1981) - et al.
Physiological studies on the utilization of oleic acid by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to microbody development
FEMS Microbiol Lett
(1991) - et al.
Enzymic analysis of the Crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Appl Environ Microbiol
(1989) - et al.
Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures
J Gen Microbiol
(1990) - et al.
Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasta continuous culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation
Yeast
(1992) - Schulze U. Anaerobic physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, 1992,...
- et al.
Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Microbiology
(1997) - et al.
Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Yeast
(1996) - et al.
Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants lacking the E1α subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex
Eur J Biochem
(1992)
Identification of the structural gene for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in yeast. Inactivation leads to a nutritional requirement for organic sulphur
EMBO J
Changes in the incorporation of carbon derived from glucose into cellular pools during the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J Gen Microbiol
Vacuolar segregation to the bud of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an analysis of morphology and timing in the cell cycle
J Gen Microbiol
Clonal size variation of rDNA cluster region on chromosome XII of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J Gen Microbiol
Is the Kluyver effect in yeasts caused by product inhibition?
Microbiology
Cited by (0)
- †
Prof. Dr. Manfred Rizzi deceased on 8 May, 1998.