Elsevier

Journal of Biotechnology

Volume 75, Issue 1, 24 September 1999, Pages 33-44
Journal of Biotechnology

The use of bi-cistronic transfer vectors for the baculovirus expression system

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00131-5Get rights and content

Abstract

In this communication, we describe the construction of bi-cistronic transfer vectors for the baculovirus expression system (BVES), which are advantageous over the existing vectors. The new vectors provide a simple way to isolate recombinant viruses. More specifically, the gene of interest and the reporter gene luciferase (LUC), constitute the first and second cistrons, respectively, of the same transcript. Therefore, the LUC activity measured during infection of such a bi-cistronic virus, permits an on-line estimation of the recombinant protein level, a very useful feature for large-scale production of recombinant proteins. To achieve expression of the second cistron, the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element of the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) was employed. However, this element, which is highly efficient in mammalian systems, did not promote efficient internal translation of the second cistron in various insect cells lines originating from different insect species. The lack of efficient internal translation was not due to baculovirus propagation since the same phenomenon was also observed in a viral-free expression system. It seems that a component essential for efficient EMCV IRES activity is either missing or present in limiting amount in insect cells or not compatible. Nevertheless, LUC placed downstream to the IRES element, or immediately downstream to the first cistron, was expressed to a level that enabled the biotechnological application it was designed for.

Introduction

The baculovirus expression vector system (BVES) is widely applicable as an alternative to prokaryotic or other eukaryotic expression systems for the production of high level recombinant proteins. Many recombinant proteins were expressed using this system and in most cases high levels of biologically active products were achieved (for review see Miller, 1988, Summers and Smith, 1988, Luckow, 1990, O’Reilly et al., 1992). Recombinant proteins are usually produced by replacing the viral polyhedrin gene with a foreign gene encoding for the protein of interest. The polyhedrin structural gene is a very late gene that is highly expressed in infected insects but is not essential for viral propagation in cultured insect cells (Smith et al., 1983). In principal, a gene of interest is cloned into a transfer vector under the strong Polyhedrin Promoter (Ppol). This vector also contains flanking sequences of the polyhedrin gene which enable specific homologous recombination to the wild-type baculovirus when the naked DNAs are cotransfected into insect cells. Isolation of recombinant viruses is tedious since homologous recombination is a rare event in transfected insect cells (about 5%). Several approaches were developed in an attempt to simplify and shorten the procedure for efficient isolation of recombinant viruses. One approach utilizes linearized viruses, in which an essential gene for viral propagation is deleted. A viable recombinant virus is produced in transfected cells only upon homologous recombination between a transfer vector that contains the deleted gene and the gene of interest (Kitts, 1995). Another approach to detect a recombinant virus utilizes a reporter gene, β-galactosidase, which is incorporated into the transfer vector leading to the formation of blue plaques only by recombinant viruses (Vialard et al., 1990). Yet, all these improvements of the BVES do not enable an immediate evaluation of the recombinant protein level produced in infected cells and do not allow the on-line monitoring of recombinant protein production in large-scale reactors in real time.

Our goal was to construct bi-cistronic vectors for the BVES that will enable instant evaluation of recombinant protein level at any given time. In general, a gene of interest and a reporter gene are cloned under the same promoter and as such are the products of the same transcriptional unit. The first cistron is translated by the ribosomal scanning mechanism (Kozak, 1987) while the second cistron is translated either via re-initiation of ribosomes or through internal ribosome binding site (reviewed in Mathews, 1996). As a result, a constant ratio between the expression of the first cistron and the second cistron is maintained. An element termed internal ribosome entry site (IRES), borrowed from a picornavirus, serves as an internal binding site for ribosome through a mechanism that does not involve scanning from the 5′ of the bi-cistronic mRNA (Jang et al., 1989). The incorporation of IRES elements in various mammalian expression vectors enabled the co-expression of at least two genes from the same transcript (Morgan et al., 1992, Dirks et al., 1993).

In this communication, the construction of bi-cistronic transfer vectors for the BVES is described. Two reporter genes, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) and firefly luciferase (LUC), were cloned downstream to the Ppol. These constructs enabled a strong expression of the gene closer to the Ppol and with about 25-fold reduction in the activity if the same gene is placed as a second cistron. Our results suggest that an efficient re-initiation of ribosomes occurs in insect cells. In some of the constructs the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) IRES element was cloned in between the two reporter genes. Unexpectedly, the presence of the well known efficient IRES element did not enhance the translation of the second cistron but rather led to an additional 50-fold decrease in its translation compared to its activity as first cistron. The fact that the reporter gene, placed as the second cistron in the transfer vectors, was easily detected either in the presence or absence of an IRES element enabled a simple isolation of recombinant viruses expressing the highest level of the gene of interest. Since both cistrons are expressed from the same transcript, a constant ratio between the levels of the two expressed proteins was observed during a recombinant bi-cistronic viral propagation. This facilitated on-line monitoring of the target recombinant protein levels in real time. Therefore, these new bi-cistronic transfer vectors provide new features to the existing BVES vectors.

Section snippets

Cells

The insect cell lines that were used in this work were: Sf9—Spodoptera frugiperda—(ATCC), Sl (SPC-SL-52)—Spodoptera littoralis, TNh5—Trichoplusia ni High five—(kindly obtained from Dr Chejanovsky). The cell lines were cultivated at 28°C in Grace’s medium (Gibco-BRL) supplemented with 3.3 g l−1 of Yeastolate and 3.3 g l−1 Lactalbumin hydrolysate (Difco), 10% fetal calf serum (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Betfobenzi, Haemek, Israel), pH 6.2 (Summers and Smith, 1988).

Virus stock

Autographa californica

Results

The construction of a bi-cistronic transfer vector for the BVES, pAcPC2, containing Ppol and a multiple cloning site in which EMCV-IRES element was inserted is schematically described in Fig. 1. The reporter genes, LUC and CAT, were cloned either as the first cistron or second cistron in this transfer vector generating the plasmids pAcPC2-LIRC and pAcPC2-CIRL, respectively (illustrated in Fig. 2). Deletion of EMCV-IRES element between the two reporter genes in the plasmid pAcPC2-CIRL, resulted

Discussion

The baculovirus expression system is widely applied in the production of numerous recombinant proteins (Luckow and Summers, 1988, Luckow, 1990). The availability of a bi-cistronic recombinant virus adds new features to this expression system such as: (1) co-expression of two polypeptides from the same transcriptional unit, (2) insertion of a reporter gene in place of the second cistron that will allow on-line assessment of the production of the first cistron since both are produced from the

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr H. Hauser for his role in the initiation of this work. This work was supported in part by the fund for the promotion of research at the Technion and by the Technion Otto Meyerhof Center for Biotechnology, established by the Minerva Foundation, Germany, to B-.Z.L.

References (25)

  • P.A. Kitts

    Production of recombinant baculoviruses using linearized viral DNA

    Methods Mol. Biol.

    (1995)
  • M. Kozak

    Effects of intercistronic length on the efficiency of reinitiation by eukaryotic ribosomes

    Mol. Cell Biol.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (32)

    • A secretary bi-cistronic baculovirus expression system with improved production of the HA1 protein of H6 influenza virus in insect cells and Spodoptera litura larvae

      2018, Journal of Immunological Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we designed a dual expression system led by single promoter for the co-expression of the target H6 subtype HA1 protein (H6HA1-His) and the reporter (enhanced green fluorescent protein, EGFP). An internal ribosome entry site (IRES) was applied to translate EGFP by starting its initiation in the middle of mRNA (Finkelstein et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2012). For the production of the secreted recombinant HA1 to facilitate purification, we first examined the expression and secretion efficiency for H6HA1-His in three signal peptides.

    • Role of N-glycosylation on Zika virus E protein secretion, viral assembly and infectivity

      2017, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      All this allowed us to focus only on the effect of the single N-linked glycosylation. Our conclusions, however, are limited to mammalian cells as the WNV replicon system was not appropriate for arthropod cells [63]. It has been reported that constant passage of ZIKV strains on cell culture or animal tissue, could lead to loss of the N154 glycosylation site.

    • IRES-based Venezuelan equine encephalitis vaccine candidate elicits protective immunity in mice

      2013, Virology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previously, Volkova et al. (2008) reported on the use of an Internal Ribosomal Entry Site (IRES) from encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) inserted within the TC-83 genome that fulfilled the above criteria. The EMCV IRES was selected because it functions to initiate translation inefficiently in insect cells while retaining strong functionality in mammalian cells (Finkelstein et al., 1999; Woolaway et al., 2001). This feature provided the mammalian-restricted tropism desired for an arbovirus vaccine.

    • A vaccine candidate for eastern equine encephalitis virus based on IRES-mediated attenuation

      2012, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The isolation of the VEEV vaccine strain, TC-83, from naturally infected mosquitoes collected in Louisiana during a 1971 Texas epidemic demonstrated the risk of transmission of attenuated alphaviruses [34], and experimental infections of the chimeric EEE vaccine strains demonstrated some residual mosquito infectivity [35]. To eliminate potential mosquito infectivity of live alphavirus vaccine strains, the findings of Finkelstein et al., that insect cells do not support efficient internal translation initiation from an encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) [36], were exploited in another vaccine design [37]. The VEEV vaccine strain TC-83 was modified in cDNA clone form to replace the subgenomic promoter with EMCV IRES to drive expression of the structural protein genes from genomic RNA in mammalian cells.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text