Oropharynx, oral cavity, floor of the mouth: CT and MRI

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00143-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Pretherapeutic staging of tumors of the oropharynx, the oral cavity and the floor of the mouth is important and should be thorough and exact to ensure appropriate therapy. Particularly important is the assessment of infiltration of deeper compartments and the topographic relationship of tumor to vascular structures (lingual artery and vein, hypoglossal nerve), or the presence of spread of the tumor across the midline. As spread of tumor may occur to a large degree underneath normal appearing mucosa, clinical assessment of the true tumor extent is difficult.

In the last 20 years computed tomography (CT) has proved its value as a supplementary non-invasive method and established its role in modern diagnostic evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an non-invasive scanning method that offers excellent tissue contrast. Ultrasonography (US) is of secondary importance, but provides useful guidance due to its wide availability and its easy use.

This paper aims to depict the possibilities of modern CT and MRI to provide ‘one-stop-shopping’ information to the clinician as a basis for the right therapeutic approach and correct estimation of the individual patient’s prognosis. A clear problem oriented imaging strategy with standardized diagnostic criteria will lead to a cost effective evaluation.

Introduction

Malignant tumors of the oropharynx, the floor of the mouth, and the oral cavity represent about 2–5% of all malignancies. Ninety percent of these tumors are squamous cell carcinomas. Other histological types of tumors are rare: adenoid cystic carcinomas arise in the minor salivary glands and show infiltrative growth spreading preferably along nerves. This tumor is known for its tendency to recur, even years after apparently successful therapy. Adenocarcinoma and the extranodal manifestations of malignant lymphoma are the next most frequent malignant lesions of this region. Sarcoma can occur. In childhood rhabdomyosarcoma is the most frequently encountered malignant tumor of this area. Most of these tumors show a predominantly superficial spread. Depending on their location, size, and histologic differentiation they metastasize early to the regional submandibular and jugular digastric lymph nodes. The patients’ prognosis is ultimately determined by the degree of metastases. When these tumors progress they infiltrate the fatty connective tissue compartments of the parapharyngeal, sublingual, or submandibular spaces, preferably along groups of muscles and/or periosteal surfaces, while respecting muscle fascia in the early stages [1], [2].

The therapy depends on the histology and the degree of differentiation of the tumor, on its location and size, on the degree and direction of infiltration into neighbouring structures, and on the degree of regional lymph node metastases. Tumor of this area are therefore classified according to the TNM criteria of the UICC [3] to aid in establishing a modern and appropriate therapy.

  • Stage T1 is a tumor of less than 2 cm (Fig. 1).

  • Stage T2 is a tumor larger than 2 cm but less than 4 cm in maximum diameter (Fig. 2).

  • Stage T3 is a tumor larger than 4 cm (Fig. 3).

  • Stage T4 is a tumor with involvement of bony structures (Fig. 4).

Two general approaches are used in the therapy of primary tumors of this region: surgery and radiation/chemotherapy. For tumors of stages T1 and T2, primary surgical therapy with a curative goal should be aimed for. Here the tumor is resected with a margin of safety of at least 1.5 cm into the healthy surrounding tissue, while the first regional lymph node station is removed as well by suprahyoidal revision. In cases where radical excision of tumor with sufficient margin of safety is not possible (this is particularly the case for tumors of stage T3 and T4) post-operative radiation therapy with a dose of 56–70 Gy is performed. T3 tumors can also be preoperatively irradiated with 30 Gy, followed by resection of the ‘down-staged’ tumor. Areas of delayed wound healing, caused by radiotherapy, can be covered with a myocutaneous flap (skin–fat–muscle flap with intact vasculature, or using microsurgical vessel anastomoses). T4 tumors with involvement of bone are excised as well, often followed by radiotherapy; bone defects can be bridged with a metal plate. If there is no recurrence within 2 years, plastic reconstruction of the bone defect using a transplant from the iliac crest and the deep iliac circumflex artery can be attempted. If the tumor is inoperable, a combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy can provide a palliative approach [2], [4].

The goal of modern diagnostic imaging is to establish the location, the size, and the extent of tumor. Particularly important is the pretherapeutic determination of tumor margins with respect to anatomic landmark structures (lingual artery and vein, carotid artery, internal jugular vein; muscles, connective tissue spaces, and bone structures) as well as assessing for tumor spread across the mid-line. These findings play an important role in therapeutic planning [2], [4].

Section snippets

Method

Methods of CT and spiral-CT examinations are discussed in detail in the article of Baum et al. in this volume. Therefore only the most important statements will be listed below:

  • The scanning region comprises the base of skull to the upper mediastinum (aortic arch). If masses extend beyond these borders the examination borders also have to be extended.

  • Standard are high-resolution-CT scanners (rotation scanners) of the third or fourth generation with a maximum rotation time of 1 s, using a display

Method

Methods of MRI examination are discussed in detail in the article of Lenz et al. in this volume. Therefore, only the most important statements will be repeated below:

  • Superconducting MR-equipment with a field strength of 1.0–1.5 T are appropriate for the evaluation of the oropharynx. Circular polarized head coils or specially designed surface array coils should be used; the body coil is insufficient.

  • Minimum display matrix size should be 256×256 pixels, slice thickness 3–5 mm.

  • The basic contrast

Discussion

Tumor characteristics in CT and MRI like signal intensity, inhomogeneity, contrast medium behaviour, etc., still cannot predict whether a lesion is benign or malignant. Only a few lesions show characteristic densities in the CT image. Lipomas are hypodense in CT and show a very high signal in T1-SE MRI [2], [6], non-Hodgkins lymphomas are homogeneous in the CT and MR image, even if they are very large, and they sometimes show high signal intensity even in the T1-SE image [2], [6]. Benign

References (26)

  • J. Cooke et al.

    Computed tomographic scanning in patients with carcinoma of the tongue

    Clin. Radiol.

    (1989)
  • S. Crawford et al.

    The role of gadolinium-DTPA in the evaluation of extracranial head and neck mass lesions

    Radiol. Clin. North Am.

    (1989)
  • A. Mancuso et al.

    Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Head and Neck

    (1985)
  • M. Lenz

    Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Head and Neck Tumors

    (1993)
  • P. Hermanek et al.

    UICC: TNM-Atlas

    (1998)
  • M. Lenz et al.

    Imaging of the oropharynx and oral cavity. Part II: pathology

    Eur. Radiol.

    (1996)
  • M. Lenz et al.

    Klinische Wertigkeit der Computertomographie beim prätherapeutischen T-Staging von orofazialen Tumoren

    Fortschr. Röntgenstr.

    (1989)
  • M. Lenz et al.

    Imaging of the oropharynx and oral cavity

    Curr. Opin. Radiol.

    (1991)
  • S.K. Mukherji et al.

    Squamous cell carcinomas that arise in the oral cavity and tongue base: can ct help predict perineural or vascular invasion?

    Radiology

    (1996)
  • M. Lenz

    Moderne bildgebende Methoden bei der Diagnostik von Tumoren des Oropharynx und der Mundhöhle

    Röntgenpraxis

    (1996)
  • M. Lenz et al.

    Kernspintomographie der Mundhöhle, des Oropharynx und des Mundbodens: Vergleich mit der Computertomographie

    Fortschr. Röntgenstr.

    (1989)
  • E. Kassel et al.

    MRI of the floor of the mouth, tongue and orohypopharynx

    Radiol. Clin. North Am.

    (1989)
  • R. Fulbright et al.

    Mr of the head and neck: comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo sequences

    Am. J. Neuroradiol.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Giant follicular cysts extended in pterygo-maxillary fossa, antro-naso-ethmoidal and orbital space associated to exophtalmos and diplopia in young patients

      2018, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular the MRI analysis, showing in a more detailed way the soft tissues is a very useful tool for the diagnosis of jaws neoformations and surgical planning [5–7]. As reported by Lenz et al. [8] the MRI offer an adjunctive aid in the diagnosis, due to its tissue contrast that allow to distinguish the lesions border from surrounding structures. In our cases, this morpho-clinical aspect was crucial to understand the disruptive behavior of the cysts.

    • Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Influence on surgical management and post-operative course

      2016, Revue de Stomatologie, de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale et de Chirurgie Orale
      Citation Excerpt :

      Clinical examination, even when precisely undertaken, does not always allow the detection of subtle bone invasion, and orthopantomogram can only detect osteolysis when at least 30% of bone mineralization is lost [8]. CT-scan is known to be an accurate imaging test in the detection of incipient cortical bone invasion, however, CT shows poor results in detecting small tumors or superficially spreading tumors [9]. Moreover, its accuracy can be highly limited by metallic dental restorations responsible for beam-hardening artifacts.

    • Oropharyngeal Cancer

      2015, Clinical Radiation Oncology
    • Computed tomography for the diagnosis of mandibular invasion caused by head and neck cancer: A systematic review comparing contrast-enhanced and plain computed tomography

      2014, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      An extra criterion should also be highlighted: the signs of erosion or degeneration of the mandible should locate around the primary tumor,27 because the location will help to differentiate tumor from periodontal disease, if multiple cortical erosion sites are present. Although CT has been accepted by most of the surgeons as a good modality to identify mandibular invasion, the diagnostic accuracy of CT in detecting mandibular invasion has varied widely, depending on the study.10 To detect whether CT was suitable for the diagnosis of mandibular invasion by determining the mean diagnostic efficacy and to compare whether any differences would be present between contrast-enhanced and plain CT, a systematic review to detect the diagnostic efficacy of CT should be conducted.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text