Trends in Cell Biology
Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2003, Pages 43-50
Journal home page for Trends in Cell Biology

Computational modeling of the EGF-receptor system: a paradigm for systems biology

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(02)00009-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Computational models have rarely been used as tools by biologists but, when models provide experimentally testable predictions, they can be extremely useful. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is probably the best-understood receptor system, and computational models have played a significant part in its elucidation. For many years, models have been used to analyze EGFR dynamics and to interpret mutational studies, and are now being used to understand processes including signal transduction, autocrine loops and developmental patterning. The success of EGFR modeling can be a guide to combining models and experiments productively to understand complex biological processes as integrated systems.

Section snippets

Binding and trafficking

The original models of EGFR binding and internalization were derived from classic enzyme kinetics 5, 6, 7. Receptor-mediated endocytosis was modeled as an enzymatic process in which surface-associated EGF was considered to be a ‘substrate’, internalized EGF was the ‘product’ and coated pits were the ‘enzyme’. This modeling approach was experimentally accessible because of the availability of radiolabeled EGF and the discovery that a simple acidic cell wash could selectively release

Signaling and functional responses

Considerable insights have been gained from combining quantitative experimental and modeling approaches to EGFR trafficking problems. An important benefit of quantitatively understanding EGFR trafficking dynamics is the improved ability to interpret data on cells' functional responses and the signal transduction processes governing them. As one simple example, the relationship between external concentrations of EGF and cell proliferation appears to be complex (as characterized by measures such

Interactions between EGFR-family members

The EGFR can form homodimers with itself and heterodimers with other members of its receptor-family, such as ErbB-2 [40]. Forming multimers can significantly affect receptor behavior such as ligand affinity and these processes have been extensively modeled. Interestingly, modeling of receptor dimerization demonstrated almost a decade ago that the multiple affinity forms of this receptor could not be explained by occupancy-induced dimerization [41]. Instead, the models suggested that either

Autocrine signaling

The EGFR itself is only a single part of the overall EGFR system. Within an organism, receptors are part of a system that includes the cognate ligand and all of the regulatory components controlling upstream aspects of ligand availability and downstream signal transduction. Although models have been useful for understanding EGFR dynamics, they are also proving to be essential for understanding the overall operation of the EGFR system. Autocrine signaling is an excellent example of how a

Transactivation and positive feedback

One of the most interesting aspects of autocrine EGFR signaling is that ligand processing and release are regulated by extracellular signals. In particular, Ras–MAPK signaling and intracellular calcium levels are major regulators of EGFR ligand release 55, 56. This appears to be the main mechanism responsible for EGFR ‘transactivation’ by other hormones (Fig. 3b). However, these signaling pathways are also activated by the EGFR itself. Combined with the high probability of autocrine-ligand

Future directions: integrated models

We have described here many of the models of the EGFR system that have been built and experimentally validated during the past 20 years. Some of these models have been used to analyze the system and to predict new and unexpected properties. So, what have we learned and how should this guide our future efforts in systems biology? First, we have learned that models are only useful if experiments can be designed that directly test specific predictions of the model; in other words, the predictions

Concluding remarks

The EGFR system appears to behave as a proportional control system in which signal processing occurs at many different points in the pathway. It is clear that cells ‘filter’ the information that they receive before passing it to the nucleus. The many different control points in the EGFR pathway make it an excellent system for investigating how cells process contextual information. We expect that computational models will be essential for understanding this process. Fortunately, the days of

Acknowledgements

Our work has been supported over the years by the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the US Department of Defense and the US Department of Energy.

References (66)

  • C.P. Chang

    Ligand-induced internalization of the epidermal growth factor receptor is mediated by multiple endocytic codes analogous to the tyrosine motif found in constitutively internalized receptors

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • L.K. Opresko

    Endocytosis and lysosomal targeting of epidermal growth factor receptors are mediated by distinct sequences independent of the tyrosine kinase domain

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • A.R. French

    Intracellular trafficking of epidermal growth factor family ligands is directly influenced by the pH sensitivity of the receptor/ligand interaction

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • H. Waterman et al.

    Molecular mechanisms underlying endocytosis and sorting of ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases

    FEBS Lett.

    (2001)
  • T. Sorkina

    Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on clathrin-coated pit recruitment and internalization of epidermal growth factor receptor

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • M. Fannon et al.

    Basic fibroblast growth factor binds its receptors, is internalized, and stimulates DNA synthesis in Balb/c3T3 cells in the absence of heparan sulfate

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • E.M. Fallon

    Increased endosomal sorting of ligand to recycling enhances potency of an interleukin-2 analog

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • B.N. Kholodenko

    Quantification of short term signaling by the epidermal growth factor receptor

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • J.M. Haugh

    Internalized epidermal growth factor receptors participate in the activation of p21Ras in fibroblasts

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • C. Wofsy

    Implications of epidermal growth factor (EGF) induced EGF receptor aggregation

    Biophys. J.

    (1992)
  • M. Martin-Fernandez

    Preformed oligomeric epidermal growth factor receptors undergo an ectodomain structure change during signaling

    Biophys. J.

    (2002)
  • T. Garrett

    Crystal structure of a truncated epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain bound to transforming growth factor alpha

    Cell

    (2002)
  • R. Worthylake

    ErbB-2 amplification inhibits down-regulation and induces constitutive activation of both ErbB-2 and epidermal growth factor receptors

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • H. Waterman

    Alternative intracellular routing of ErbB receptors may determine signaling potency

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • K.E. Forsten et al.

    Autocrine ligand binding to cell receptors. Mathematical analysis of competition by solution ‘decoys’

    Biophys. J.

    (1992)
  • S.Y. Shvartsman

    Spatial range of autocrine signaling: modeling and computational analysis

    Biophys. J.

    (2001)
  • A.E. DeWitt

    Affinity regulates spatial range of EGF receptor autocrine ligand binding

    Dev. Biol.

    (2002)
  • J. Baselga

    Autocrine regulation of membrane transforming growth factor-alpha cleavage

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • Z. Gechtman

    The shedding of membrane-anchored heparin-binding epidermal-like growth factor is regulated by the Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and by cell adhesion and spreading

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • J. Dong et al.

    Trafficking and proteolytic release of epidermal growth factor receptor ligands are modulated by their membrane-anchoring domains

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • H.S. Wiley

    Intracellular processing of epidermal growth factor and its effect on ligand–receptor interactions

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1985)
  • J.M. Haugh et al.

    Analysis of receptor internalization as a mechanism for modulating signal transduction

    J. Theor. Biol.

    (1998)
  • G. Carpenter

    The EGF receptor: a nexus for trafficking and signaling

    BioEssays

    (2000)
  • Cited by (295)

    • Ligand-receptor promiscuity enables cellular addressing

      2022, Cell Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      These processes can enrich the complexity of computations beyond those analyzed here and thereby potentially further enhance the number and distinguishability of addressing channels. Although smaller, more focused models have been essential for developing our current understanding of signaling, fully describing biological systems will require building integrated models that span multiple scales and processes (Wells and Wiley, 2018; Wiley et al., 2003). BMPs function as morphogens, provoking the question of whether and how addressing plays out in a dynamic, spatially extended “heterocellular” tissue context (Wells and Wiley, 2018).

    • Static Analysis and Stochastic Search for Reachability Problem

      2020, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
    • Revisiting a controversy: The effect of EGF on EGFR dimer stability

      2020, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes
    • A Loss of Epigenetic Control Can Promote Cell Death through Reversing the Balance of Pathways in a Signaling Network

      2018, Molecular Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      To explore this mechanism further, we developed a computational model of the IGF2-IGF1R-Akt-Erk signaling network (Figure 3D, see Methods S1), which we first trained for LOI cells on three separate repeats of experiments summarized in Figure 1, treating each experiment separately (as shown in left-hand panels of Figure 3E, see details of the model in STAR Methods) (Jones et al., 1993). The parameters of the model for each repeat were estimated separately, by minimizing the mean square error between the experimental Akt and Erk profiles versus the corresponding activation profiles predicted by the model (Barnett et al., 2005; Surinya et al., 2008; Forbes et al., 2002; Danielsen et al., 1990; Wiley et al., 2003; Hatakeyama et al., 2003). This defined the model space, capturing experimental variability and thus parameter uncertainty (shaded areas in Figure 3E).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text