Chapter 23 - Chemical screening in zebrafish for novel biological and therapeutic discovery
Introduction
In the past 15 years, many successful therapeutics have been efficiently discovered by cell-based and biochemical drug screening. However, these screening methods do not consider in vivo small molecule activity. Potential therapeutics from such screens often do not pass in vivo testing in live organisms such as mice, since they have inherent toxicity and poor pharmacoproperties undetectable by the screening process. Also, small molecules may act differently in whole organisms due to their complex biology, as compared to more straightforward biology in cell cultures and purified proteins. Such screens are encountering problems with proteins that are difficult to target, such as transcription factors. These proteins are termed “undruggable”, since they are inept in binding small molecules and often carry out their functions through protein–protein or protein–DNA/RNA interactions.
Zebrafish chemical screening can address the problems inherent in cell-based and biochemical screens. Screening in a whole organism context means drug toxicity and in vivo drug effects are addressed concurrently. Whole organism screening has the advantage of being less targeted then cell-based and biochemical screens, allowing the drug to interact with any biological pathway. The readout is an alteration of a whole organism phenotype that relates well to disease. In contrast, protein–compound binding or cell-based reporters give little indication of disease phenotype modulation. Furthermore, technological advances have made zebrafish screens straightforward and cost effective. It has been 15 years since the first zebrafish screen was attempted, and already, a number of potential therapeutics have been discovered that target processes ranging from hematopoiesis to cancer (Table 1). Zebrafish screening might also provide the ability to discover therapeutic modulators of “undruggable” processes, as it explores biology to a complexity unseen in cell-based or biochemical screens. Overall, zebrafish screening is a convenient and ideal technology for novel therapeutic discovery.
Section snippets
Rationale
Zebrafish screening allows for high-throughput chemical genetics in vivo. This is its greatest advantage over cell-based and biochemical screening. Screening chemicals in the context of the whole organism allows for unique phenotypes to be screened for, other than the traditional alteration of cell state in cell-based assays or target identification (target ID) in protein-binding biochemical assays. Furthermore, small molecules are screened in the context of the complex biology of the whole
Specific versus nonspecific phenotypes
Most often screens are conducted to generate hypotheses on a specific biological question. These screens are scored based on a chosen morphology change of interest and the aim is to discover specific chemical modifiers of disease or biological pathways. Less frequently conducted are nonspecific screens that score any morphological change observed. These have been carried out to determine compound bioactivity in broad terms; the readouts being any observable perturbation of development(Das
Biological Relevance of Zebrafish Screening
Multiple phenotypes can be observed in zebrafish chemical screening. One can observe behavioral changes such as sleep/wake patterns or a movement response to light. In addition, one can also observe changes in gene expression either overall or in specific tissues due to chemical action. Such observations are not possible in cell-based or biochemical screening platforms. Zebrafish screening allows for exploration into the behavioral effects of small molecules, something only whole organism
Summary
Zebrafish chemical screening is very useful for therapeutic and bioprobe discovery. It provides a medium- to high-throughput manner of assessing the phenotypic effects of small molecule libraries on an in vivo system. This allows for toxicity, pharmacoproperties and effects of compounds to be studied in a complex biological system, taking into account metabolism and cell–cell interactions. Also, zebrafish provide a wide variety of scoring phenotypes which can be adapted to specific study aims.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Justin L. Tan for writing the last edition of this chapter, Thorsten Schlaeger and Richard White for input on chemoinformatics, and Isaac Adatto and Christian Lawrence for their input on the zebrafish spawning vessel technology. L.I. Zon is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. L.I. Zon is a founder and stock holder of Fate, Inc. and a scientific advisor for Stemgent.
References (92)
- et al.
Three different noggin genes antagonize the activity of bone morphogenetic proteins in the zebrafish embryo
Developmental Biology
(1999) - et al.
Selective small molecule targeting β-catenin function discovered by in vivo chemical genetic screen
Cell Reports
(2013) - et al.
Artery/vein specification is governed by opposing phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and MAP kinase/ERK signaling
Current Biology
(2006) - et al.
Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of human MAP kinase phosphatase 5: structural insight into constitutively active phosphatase
Journal of Molecular Biology
(2006) - et al.
An in vivo zebrafish screen identifies organophosphate antidotes with diverse mechanisms of action
Journal of Biomolecular Screening
(2013) - et al.
Small molecule screen for compounds that affect vascular development in the zebrafish retina
Mechanisms of Development
(2009) - et al.
Neural crest development and craniofacial morphogenesis is coordinated by nitric oxide and histone acetylation
Chemistry & Biology
(2014) - et al.
Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings1
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
(2001) - et al.
Cannabinoid receptor 2 suppresses leukocyte inflammatory migration by modulating the JNK/c-Jun/Alox5 pathway
Journal of Biological Chemistry
(2013) - et al.
Unraveling tissue regeneration pathways using chemical genetics
Journal of Biological Chemistry
(2007)