Implications of pharmacokinetic behavior of lipoplex for its inflammatory toxicity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Inflammatory toxicity represents a typical toxicity associated with systemic administration of cationic liposome/DNA complex (lipoplex). Collected information indicates that the lipoplex gene delivery system mediates an uptake of plasmid DNA by the liver, mainly by Kupffer cells, in which a large amount of cytokine is produced. Therefore, many efforts have been made to overcome this problem. Previous reports by our laboratory demonstrated that sequential injection of cationic liposome and DNA could dramatically decrease the toxicity. In comparison with lipoplex injection, this method significantly suppresses the uptake of DNA by the liver. Opsonization effect in the stimulation of Kupffer cell uptake is proposed as an explanation for the differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of plasmid DNA after lipoplex injection and sequential injection. In this review, we cover the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying inflammatory toxicity and the several attempts to overcome this toxicity. The mechanism related to the pharmacokinetic properties of the lipoplex is focused on here for discussion.

Introduction

Cationic lipids are the most extensively studied nonviral vectors for gene delivery. This kind of vectors, in virtue of their positive charges, is capable of complexing with negatively charged DNA. The resulting cationic liposome/DNA complex (lipoplex) has shown a great promise in introduction of DNA into cells both in vitro and in vivo [1], [2]. Several lipoplex formulations have been evaluated in clinical treatment of cancer [3], [4] and cystic fibrosis [5], [6], [7]. Specially, systemic administration of lipoplex symbolizes a progress in the development of liposomal vectors, which could efficiently express a therapeutic gene in the lung in animal models, as well as other major organs with moderate levels of gene expression [8], [9], [10], [11]. However, the application of lipoplex has been complicated by the occurrence of acute inflammatory toxicity, which was observed in animal studies and human clinical trials at effective dose [12]. Further improvements in the nonviral gene delivery formulations rely on understanding the lipoplex-associated inflammatory toxicity [13]. Currently, many studies have focused on exploring the mechanism of the inflammatory toxicity and looking for means to overcome the toxicity [12]. A valuable progress has been made in understanding the lipoplex-induced the immune response [14]; thereafter, several strategies have been successful in animal models [12].

In this review, we provide an overview of the understanding of systemic lipoplex-induced inflammatory toxicity. Emphasis is placed on the discussion of the correlation between the pharmacokinetic behavior of DNA and the inflammatory toxicity by comparing the differences in the pharmacokinetics of DNA following lipoplex injection and sequential injection. Sequential injection is one of the strategies used to ablate diminish the toxicity associated with the application of cationic liposomes for gene transfection in vivo [15]. This review intends to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between the pharmacokinetic behavior of lipoplex and their inflammatory toxicity. We also want to demonstrate the usefulness of pharmacokinetics in evaluating the benefit of a novel gene delivery system.

Section snippets

General observations on the lipoplex-induced toxicity

Little toxicity was observed, in early studies, when lipoplex was administered in moderate doses by either local or systemic injection [12]. However, mortality occurs in animals after systemic administration of several cationic lipid-based gene delivery systems at high dose [9], [11], [16]. The systemic toxicity of lipoplex has been comprehensively studied, in which various cationic lipids were explored, such as GL-67, GL-62, DMRIE, DOTMA, DOTAP [17], [18], [19]. The toxicities observed in

Biodistribution of DNA delivered via lipoplex

While it is clear that CpG motifs in the plasmid DNA contribute to the inflammatory toxicity of lipoplex, it is also important to understand the biodistribution of plasmid DNA after lipoplex injection. The methods for monitoring plasmid DNA include Southern blotting, PCR analysis and isotope tracking of 32P- or 125I-labeled plasmid DNA [9], [47], [48], [49]. Although the organ distribution of DNA varies with different cationic lipids, a general distribution profile can be illustrated in Table 1

Reduction in inflammatory toxicity with sequential injection

The normal practice of gene transfer by cationic liposome in vivo involves mixing plasmid DNA and cationic liposome to form a complex, i.e., lipoplex, and then inject the complex into the test animal. However, it was reported by Song et al. that equal or higher level of gene expression in the lung could be obtained if one injected cationic liposome first, a few minutes later, injected DNA [72]. Later, it was found by our laboratory that this sequential injection method, with an optimized

Conclusions

Pharmacokinetic studies can provide us with useful information about the mechanisms underlying inflammatory toxicity associated with the systemic administration of lipoplex. We assume that opsonization of lipoplex by certain serum proteins may assist the immunostimulatory plasmid DNA in being selectively guided to Kupffer cells; therein resulting in high level of cytokine induction. As a successful example of minimizing the inflammatory toxicity, sequential injection of liposomes and DNA leads

References (73)

  • V. Escriou

    Cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer: effect of serum on cellular uptake and intracellular fate of lipopolyamine/DNA complexes

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1998)
  • E.K. Wasan

    A multi-step lipid mixing assay to model structural changes in cationic lipoplexes used for in vitro transfection

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1999)
  • I.S. Zuhorn

    Interference of serum with lipoplex–cell interaction: modulation of intracellular processing

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2002)
  • B.M. Tandia

    Identification of human plasma proteins that bind to cationic lipid/DNA complex and analysis of their effects on transfection efficiency: implications for intravenous gene transfer

    Molec. Ther.

    (2003)
  • N.M. Wassef et al.

    Complement-dependent phagocytosis of liposomes by macrophages: suppressive effects of “stealth” lipids

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1991)
  • H. Aoki et al.

    Effects of blood on the uptake of charged liposomes by perfused rat liver: cationic glucoamine-modified liposomes interact with erythrocyte and escape phagocytosis by macrophages

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • J. Senior et al.

    Antibody-coated liposomes. The role of non-specific antibody adsorption

    FEBS Lett.

    (1986)
  • J.H. Senior et al.

    Interaction of positively-charged liposomes with blood: implications for their application in vivo

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1991)
  • D.V. Devine

    Liposome-complement interactions in rat serum: implications for liposome survival studies

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1994)
  • C.D. Oja

    Influence of dose on liposome clearance: critical role of blood proteins

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1996)
  • P.L. Felgner

    Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1987)
  • G.J. Nabel

    Direct gene transfer with DNA–liposome complexes in melanoma: expression, biologic activity, and lack of toxicity in humans

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1993)
  • K.M. Hui

    Phase I study of immunotherapy of cutaneous metastases of human carcinoma using allogeneic and xenogeneic MHC DNA–liposome complexes

    Gene Ther.

    (1997)
  • N.J. Caplen

    Liposome-mediated CFTR gene transfer to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis

    Nat. Med.

    (1995)
  • G. McLachlan

    Laboratory and clinical studies in support of cystic fibrosis gene therapy using pCMV-CFTR-DOTAP

    Gene Ther.

    (1996)
  • D.R. Gill

    A placebo-controlled study of liposome-mediated gene transfer to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis

    Gene Ther.

    (1997)
  • X. Gao et al.

    Cationic liposome-mediated gene transfer

    Gene Ther.

    (1995)
  • F. Liu

    Factors controlling the efficiency of cationic lipid-mediated transfection in vivo via intravenous administration

    Gene Ther.

    (1997)
  • Y. Liu

    Factors influencing the efficiency of cationic liposome-mediated intravenous gene delivery

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (1997)
  • S. Li et al.

    In vivo gene transfer via intravenous administration of cationic lipid–protamine–DNA (LPD) complexes

    Gene Ther.

    (1997)
  • L. Huang et al.

    Liposomal gene delivery: a complex package

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (1997)
  • A. Wilson et al.

    Complex roles of CpG in liposomal delivery of DNA and oligonucleotides

    Biosci. Rep.

    (2002)
  • H.E. Hofland

    In vivo gene transfer by intravenous administration of stable cationic lipid/DNA complex

    Pharm. Res.

    (1997)
  • J.D. Tousignant

    Comprehensive analysis of the acute toxicities induced by systemic administration of cationic lipid:plasmid DNA complexes in mice

    Hum. Gene Ther.

    (2000)
  • N.S. Yew

    Contribution of plasmid DNA to inflammation in the lung after administration of cationic lipid:pDNA complexes

    Hum. Gene Ther.

    (1999)
  • Y. Tan

    The inhibitory role of CpG immunostimulatory motifs in cationic lipid vector-mediated transgene expression in vivo

    Hum. Gene Ther.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (186)

    • Nano-pharmacokinetics: Interface of physics, chemistry and biology

      2021, Nano-Pharmacokinetics and Theranostics: Advancing Cancer Therapy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text