Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 107, September 2015, Pages 79-85
Animal Behaviour

Red squirrels use territorial vocalizations for kin discrimination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Red squirrels use rattle vocalizations during territory defence.

  • Rattle acoustic structure is repeatable, suggesting rattles are individually distinctive.

  • Squirrels do not respond differently to the rattles of neighbours and non-neighbours.

  • Squirrels rattle more frequently in response to the rattles of nonkin versus kin.

  • Red squirrels use individually distinctive rattles to discriminate kin from nonkin.

The ability to discriminate among individuals, or among classes of individuals, can provide animals with important fitness benefits. Although several mechanisms for discrimination are possible, most require animals to show stable phenotypic variation that reflects their identity or their membership in a particular class (e.g. sex, mate, kin). For territorial animals that rarely interact physically, vocalizations could serve as long-distance signals that facilitate discrimination. In this study, we tested whether the territorial rattle vocalizations of North American red squirrels, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, are repeatable, and whether they could hence provide the basis for multiple types of discrimination. We measured four structural features from two rattles from each of 76 marked squirrels. All four features were repeatable, which is consistent with territorial rattles being individually distinctive. We then conducted a playback experiment to determine whether squirrels use rattles for discrimination. Specifically, we tested whether squirrels discriminate between the rattles of neighbours and non-neighbours, and kin (coefficient of relatedness, r  0.25) and non-kin (r < 0.125). Following a 2 × 2 factorial design, we broadcast a rattle from a non-neighbouring nonkin individual to 15 subjects, from a neighbouring nonkin individual to 14 subjects, from a non-neighbouring kin individual to 11 subjects, and from a neighbouring kin individual to 13 subjects. Subjects did not discriminate between the rattles of neighbours and non-neighbours, but did respond differently to the rattles of kin and nonkin. Specifically, squirrels were significantly more likely to produce a rattle of their own in response to the broadcasted rattles of nonkin versus the broadcasted rattles of kin. This result demonstrates that red squirrels can use territorial vocalizations for kin discrimination. It also suggests that they are more tolerant of territorial intrusions by kin.

Section snippets

Subjects

Subjects were derived from a marked population of North American red squirrels (T. hudsonicus; Erxleben, 1777) that has been studied annually in the southwest Yukon Territory of Canada (61°N, 138°W) since 1989 (McAdam, Boutin, Sykes, & Humphries, 2007). All individuals in the population were marked with numbered metal eartags when first captured (usually just after birth when in the natal nest) and were then live-trapped each year throughout their lifetime. We also attached a unique combination

Acoustic Analysis

We recorded one unsolicited territorial rattle from each of 172 individually marked red squirrels. Rattles had an average ± SD duration of 3.0 ± 1.4 s (range 0.4–10.0 s), an average call rate of 19.1 ± 2.0 pulses/s (range 12.6–25.2 pulses/s), an average dominant frequency of 1124 ± 152 Hz (range 770–1460 Hz) and an average entropy of 6.5 ± 0.3 bits (range 5.6–7.1 bits). None of the acoustic features differed significantly between females and males (unpaired t tests: all |t171| < 1.64, all P  0.10), between adults

Discussion

Red squirrels produced territorial vocalizations with repeatable acoustic structure, and they used these vocalizations to discriminate between kin and nonkin. We found no evidence that squirrels use rattles to discriminate between neighbours and non-neighbours.

Our acoustic analysis showed that red squirrels produce territorial rattles that reflect the signaller's identity. The ICCs of the four structural features that we measured were each significantly greater than zero, which is consistent

Acknowledgments

We thank the many field technicians who helped collect the data, A. Sykes and E. Anderson who served as head technicians during the duration of the study, Agnes Moose and her family for long-term access to her trapline, and J. Slate and M. R. Gunn who helped to develop the paternal pedigree. The McAdam lab group and two anonymous referees provided helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This is paper number 81 in the Kluane Red Squirrel Project. This project was supported by

References (38)

  • D. Berteaux et al.

    Breeding dispersal in female North American red squirrels

    Ecology

    (2000)
  • A.R. Blaustein

    Kin recognition mechanisms: phenotype matching or recognition alleles?

    American Naturalist

    (1983)
  • J.W. Boughman et al.

    Social sounds: vocal learning and development of mammal and bird calls

  • B. Dantzer et al.

    Behavioral responses of territorial red squirrels to natural and experimental variation in population density

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

    (2012)
  • S.M. Digweed et al.

    Who's your neighbour? Acoustic cues to individual identity in red squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus rattle calls

    Current Zoology

    (2012)
  • J.L. Donald et al.

    Intraspecific cache pilferage by larder-hoarding red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus)

    Journal of Mammalogy

    (2011)
  • J.B. Fisher

    Evolution and bird sociality

  • F. Gerhardt

    Food pilfering in larder-hoarding red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus)

    Journal of Mammalogy

    (2005)
  • J.C. Gorrell et al.

    Adopting kin enhances inclusive fitness in asocial red squirrels

    Nature Communications

    (2010)
  • Cited by (24)

    • An independent experiment does not support stress-mediated kin discrimination through red squirrel vocalizations

      2021, Animal Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, preplayback rattle rates in our current study were noticeably higher than those previously reported in both Wilson et al. (2015) and Shonfield et al. (2017). The exact reason for the discrepancies seen between the results of Wilson et al. (2015), Shonfield et al. (2017) and our study is unknown. Statistical power cannot account for these discrepancies, as the patterns we observed relating to playback context and relatedness were in the opposite direction of those observed by Shonfield et al. (2017).

    • Familiar Neighbors, but Not Relatives, Enhance Fitness in a Territorial Mammal

      2021, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Red squirrels are arboreal rodents in which both sexes defend exclusive territories year-round.15 Territories are important for overwinter survival16 and are defended through vocalizations called “rattles”17, which are uniquely identifiable.18 Juveniles typically disperse 100 m on average and females sometimes bequeath all or part of their territory to offspring.19

    • Mating calls are a sensitive indicator of phylogenetic relationships in tropical tree squirrels (Callosciurus spp.)

      2018, Mammalian Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because the Sciuridae family frequently uses acoustic communication, they are suitable for studying the diversity of sound characteristics. Sciurids produce sounds in various situations, such as predator alerts (e.g., Balph and Balph, 1966; Sherman, 1977; Owings and Leger, 1980; Blumstein and Armitage, 1997); territory defense (e.g., Lair, 1990; Digweed et al., 2012; Wilson et al., 2015); mother-infant interactions (e.g., Emmons, 1978, Lishak, 1982; Tamura and Ohba, 1993) and mating activities (e.g., Farentinos, 1972; Thompson, 1977; Grady and Hoogland, 1986; Tamura, 1993). Both inter-specific and inter-population differences in acoustic characteristics have been reported in various genera of squirrels, including Cynomys (Waring, 1970), Spermophilus (Fagerstone, 1987; Eiler and Banack, 2004), Tamias (Brand, 1976; Blankenship and Brand, 1987), Tamiasciurus (Smith, 1978), Paraxerus (Viljoen, 1983), Callosciurus (Tamura and Yong, 1993) and Glaucomys (Eisinger et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text