Elsevier

Biochimie

Volume 117, October 2015, Pages 22-27
Biochimie

Review
RNA editing of non-coding RNA and its role in gene regulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2015.05.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Primate specific inverted Alu repeats frequently form double stranded structures in transcripts.

  • Up to 100 million adenosines can be deaminated to inosine in the human transcriptome.

  • Most A-to-I editing sites in human are located to non-coding Alu RNA.

  • In concert Alu inverted repeats and RNA editing modify gene expression.

Abstract

It has for a long time been known that repetitive elements, particularly Alu sequences in human, are edited by the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA, ADAR, family. The functional interpretation of these events has been even more difficult than that of editing events in coding sequences, but today there is an emerging understanding of their downstream effects. A surprisingly large fraction of the human transcriptome contains inverted Alu repeats, often forming long double stranded structures in RNA transcripts, typically occurring in introns and UTRs of protein coding genes. Alu repeats are also common in other primates, and similar inverted repeats can frequently be found in non-primates, although the latter are less prone to duplex formation. In human, as many as 700,000 Alu elements have been identified as substrates for RNA editing, of which many are edited at several sites. In fact, recent advancements in transcriptome sequencing techniques and bioinformatics have revealed that the human editome comprises at least a hundred million adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) editing sites in Alu sequences. Although substantial additional efforts are required in order to map the editome, already present knowledge provides an excellent starting point for studying cis-regulation of editing. In this review, we will focus on editing of long stem loop structures in the human transcriptome and how it can effect gene expression.

Introduction

Up to 75% of the human genome is known to be transcribed but only a couple of percent of the total amount of RNA is protein coding [1]. Lately, much attention has been given to the increasing number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) with proven functionality. In the search for functional non-coding RNA, potential functionality within introns and UTRs is often overlooked. However, non-coding RNA elements can also be embedded within pre-mRNAs and structural elements in introns can influence RNA processing of exons. The primate specific Alu repeats, a repetitive small interspersed element (SINE), are abundant in the human transcriptome, particularly within gene rich regions [2], [3], and can act as cis-inducers for RNA modifications. In all multi-cellular organisms, double stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules are subjected to RNA modifications by adenosine deamination. This was first discovered when long completely base paired RNA-duplexes, injected into frog oocytes, were observed to become unwinded to single stranded molecules [4]. This was later shown to be due to modifications of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) catalyzed by the family of adenosine deamination enzymes, i.e., the ADAR family [5]. The mammalian genome has two active members of this family, ADAR1 and ADAR2, see Refs. [6], [7], [8]. ADAR1 is both nuclear and cytoplasmic; ADAR2 is in contrast mainly present in the nucleus [9], [10], [11], [12]. It is known that most editing events occur in the nucleus and, since inosine is structurally similar to guanosine, in cellular processes such as splicing and translation, inosine is typically recognized as guanosine [13]. Even though in principle any dsRNA could be subjected to editing, the only known substrates for ADAR enzymes are RNA polymerase II transcripts.

No specific sequence has been found that characterize editing sites of any of the ADAR enzymes; however, in the neighboring position downstream of the edited A, there is an overrepresentation of G, while G is underrepresented in the upstream neighboring position [14], [15]. ADAR1 has lower site selectivity than ADAR2, but their sets of target sites are overlapping [16]. It appears that, in general, the number of edited sites in a duplex depends on its length in a superlinear fashion. Short stems interrupted by bulges and internal loops are often edited only at one specific site, while longer stem loop structures often are hyper-edited at the majority of the adenosines in a double stranded region (reviewed in Ref. [17]). For a handful of brain specific genes, involved in neurotransmission, A-to-I editing of coding sequences has been found to be of high functional importance (reviewed in Ref. [18]). The vast majority of all editing sites reside, however, in non-coding regions, particularly in inverted Alu repeats [19], [20], [21], [22]. In this review, we will focus on how these and other highly structured non-coding RNA sequences regulate both expression and processing of encoded genes in cis by attracting the A-to-I RNA editing enzyme ADAR. We also discuss the role of ADAR in circRNA biogenesis.

Section snippets

Alu repeats are abundant in primate genomes

The human genome harbors over one million Alu retrotransposons [23], each containing approximately 300 nucleotides (nt), together constituting more or less 10% of the genome. Alu repeats are one of the most abundant class of retrotransposon insertions in human as well as chimpanzee; yet, the number of copies in human is 3.4 fold larger than in the chimpanzee [31]. They originate from a duplication of the 7SL RNA gene [25], [26]. It has been proposed that, before the divergence of primates and

Editing may protect the cell from deleterious long dsRNA

It is well-known that dsRNA longer than 30 base pairs (bp) can, through activation of the dsRNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR), induce translational arrest and eventually cell apoptosis [36]. It is yet unknown why presence of inverted stem loop structures formed by Alu repeats do not lead to harmful PKR activation and, in particular, whether RNA editing has a preventive role in this context.

PKR is important in the mammal host viral response: long double stranded viral RNA triggers an immune

Conclusions and perspectives

A key property of non-coding RNA is its capability to form stable structures by intramolecular or intermolecular base paring. In this review, we have focused on the intramolecular base pairing of intervening RNA sequence and its potential in recruiting the ADAR enzymes within transcribed genes. Recruitment of the ADAR editing enzyme to double stranded RNA, typically, leads to A-to-I modification, but non-coding double stranded RNA can also induce editing at proximate coding sequences. In

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Patrick Young, Mikaela Behm, Heli Pessa and Ditte Rigardt for critically reading the paper. This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council, K2013-66X-20702-06-4.

References (70)

  • J.M. Nigro et al.

    Scrambled exons

    Cell

    (1991)
  • B. Capel et al.

    Circular transcripts of the testis-determining gene Sry in adult mouse testis

    Cell

    (1993)
  • X.O. Zhang et al.

    Complementary sequence-mediated exon circularization

    Cell

    (2014)
  • A. Ivanov et al.

    Analysis of intron sequences reveals Hallmarks of circular RNA biogenesis in animals

    Cell Rep.

    (2015)
  • R. Ashwal-Fluss et al.

    circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing

    Mol. Cell

    (2014)
  • A. Rybak-Wolf et al.

    Circular RNAs in the mammalian brain are highly abundant, conserved, and dynamically expressed

    Mol. Cell

    (2015)
  • S. Djebali et al.

    Landscape of transcription in human cells

    Nature

    (2012)
  • N. Sela et al.

    Comparative analysis of transposed element insertion within human and mouse genomes reveals Alu's unique role in shaping the human transcriptome

    Genome Biol.

    (2007)
  • D. Grover et al.

    Alu repeat analysis in the complete human genome: trends and variations with respect to genomic composition

    Bioinformatics

    (2004)
  • B.L. Bass et al.

    A standardized nomenclature for adenosine deaminases that act on RNA

    RNA

    (1997)
  • M.A. O'Connell et al.

    Cloning of cDNAs encoding mammalian double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (1995)
  • T. Melcher et al.

    A mammalian RNA editing enzyme

    Nature

    (1996)
  • J.M. Desterro et al.

    Dynamic association of RNA-editing enzymes with the nucleolus

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2003)
  • J.B. Patterson et al.

    Expression and regulation by interferon of a double-stranded-RNA-specific adenosine deaminase from human cells: evidence for two forms of the deaminase

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (1995)
  • H. Poulsen et al.

    CRM1 mediates the export of ADAR1 through a nuclear export signal within the Z-DNA binding domain

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (2001)
  • C.L. Sansam et al.

    Modulation of RNA editing by functional nucleolar sequestration of ADAR2

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2003)
  • C. Basilio et al.

    Synthetic polynucleotides and the amino acid code. V

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1962)
  • J.B. Li et al.

    Genome-wide identification of human RNA editing sites by parallel DNA capturing and sequencing

    Science

    (2009)
  • A.G. Polson et al.

    Preferential selection of adenosines for modification by double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase

    EMBO J.

    (1994)
  • A.M. Källman et al.

    ADAR2 A-->I editing: site selectivity and editing efficiency are separate events

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2003)
  • H. Wahlstedt et al.

    Site-selective versus promiscuous A-to-I editing

    Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA

    (2011)
  • A. Tariq et al.

    Transcript diversification in the nervous system: a to I RNA editing in CNS function and disease development

    Front. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • A. Athanasiadis et al.

    Widespread A-to-I RNA editing of Alu-containing mRNAs in the human transcriptome

    PLoS Biol.

    (2004)
  • M. Blow et al.

    A survey of RNA editing in human brain

    Genome Res.

    (2004)
  • D.D. Kim et al.

    Widespread RNA editing of embedded Alu elements in the human transcriptome

    Genome Res.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (55)

    • Metformin inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation by regulation of a novel Loc100506691-CHAC1 axis

      2021, Molecular Therapy Oncolytics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, studies have revealed that metformin inhibits cellular proliferation, induces cell death, and causes partial cell cycle arrest in gastric cancer.9,10 Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a group of nonprotein coding transcripts more than 200 bp in length.11,12 They have been demonstrated to participate in several biological functions by modulating complicated signaling pathways, such as those responsible for chromosome dosage compensation, imprinting, epigenetic regulation, cell cycle control, nuclear and cytoplasmic trafficking, transcription, translation, splicing, and cell differentiation.11,13,14

    • miR124-3p/FGFR2 axis inhibits human keratinocyte proliferation and migration and improve the inflammatory microenvironment in psoriasis

      2020, Molecular Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      More importantly, the overexpression of FGFR2 in HaCaT cells under rIL-22 stimulation might remarkably attenuate the effects of miR-124-3p overexpression, indicating that miR-124-3p improves rIL-22-induced psoriatic changes through targeting FGFR2. Notably, in addition to well-established events such as splicing, capping, and polyadenylation, other RNA editing mechanisms and regulation of transcription mediated by miRNAs have been taking increasing attention during the past decades (Orlandi et al., 2012; Daniel et al., 2015). Interestingly, recent research has highlighted the possibility of miRNA self-editing.

    • Long-term effects of vegetation and soil on the microbial communities following afforestation of farmland with Robinia pseudoacacia plantations

      2020, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      Liu et al. (2010) indicted that soil microbial community diversity is significantly affected by plant biomass and flora richness. Further research revealed that the increase in vegetation coverage changes the soil water content and solar radiation, which in turn drives the diversity of soil microbial communities (Bakker et al., 2014; Daniel et al., 2015). Dang et al. (2018) and Williams et al. (2013) reported that soil microbial community composition is related to soil pH and inorganic nitrogen, indicating that microbial communities are more sensitive to soil acidification and nitrogen conversion.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text