Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 30, Issue 12, April 2009, Pages 2164-2174
Biomaterials

Leading Opinion
Organ printing: Tissue spheroids as building blocks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.084Get rights and content

Abstract

Organ printing can be defined as layer-by-layer additive robotic biofabrication of three-dimensional functional living macrotissues and organ constructs using tissue spheroids as building blocks. The microtissues and tissue spheroids are living materials with certain measurable, evolving and potentially controllable composition, material and biological properties. Closely placed tissue spheroids undergo tissue fusion — a process that represents a fundamental biological and biophysical principle of developmental biology-inspired directed tissue self-assembly. It is possible to engineer small segments of an intraorgan branched vascular tree by using solid and lumenized vascular tissue spheroids. Organ printing could dramatically enhance and transform the field of tissue engineering by enabling large-scale industrial robotic biofabrication of living human organ constructs with “built-in” perfusable intraorgan branched vascular tree. Thus, organ printing is a new emerging enabling technology paradigm which represents a developmental biology-inspired alternative to classic biodegradable solid scaffold-based approaches in tissue engineering.

Introduction

The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate natural-like functional human tissues and organs suitable for regeneration, repair and replacement of damaged, injured or lost human organs [1], [2], [3], [4]. The engineered tissues and organs are technically “artificial” or “man-made” based on methods of their generation, but at the same time they are also “natural-like” living tissues and organs. At least theoretically, an ideal tissue engineered human organ must eliminate, dramatically reduce, or more realistically reinvent the problem of biocompatibility [5], which is a critically important issue for any biomaterial-based approach for creating artificial organs, devices or prostheses. Without tissue engineering, living functional human organs can be produced only during natural embryonic development. How close tissue engineers can recapitulate and capture the most essential structure–function features of normal natural human tissues and organs, and how far they must try to imitate developmental histogenesis, morphogenesis and organogenesis, are still open for debate. Because of economic constraints and the intrinsic limitations of producing living tissues and organs, it is reasonable to assume that biofabrication technology will probably not allow one to create a 100% authentic copy of functional living human organs. Rather, engineering of natural-like functional vascularized tissue engineered organ constructs capable of restoring essential function is a more realistic technological goal and represent a great accomplishment if successful. Developmental processes already serve as a positive control or reference point and provide powerful insights into tissue engineering [6], [7]. Furthermore, the integration of developmental biology and tissue engineering, or the so-called biomimetic approach, is not wishful thinking but rather work in progress [8]. It is interesting that one initially suggested term for the tissue engineering field was “chimeric neomorphogenesis” [9]. Thus, it is safe to predict that deep understanding, biomimicking and employing developmental mechanisms of embryonic histogenesis and organogenesis can be very beneficial for tissue engineering. The goal of this paper is to introduce and discuss a novel, rapidly emerging developmental biology-inspired paradigm of solid biodegradable scaffold-free minitissue-based biomimetic approach, or more specifically, organ printing using self-assembled tissue spheroids as a possible alternative to classic solid biodegradable scaffold-based approach in the field of tissue engineering.

Section snippets

Intrinsic limitations of biodegradable solid scaffold-based approaches in tissue engineering

Classic biodegradable solid scaffold-based approaches, that still represent a dominating conceptual framework or paradigm in tissue engineering, originated from attempts by chemical engineers to create porous scaffolds from biodegradable polymers as a temporal template-like instructive support for cell attachment and tissue neomorphogenesis [9], [10]. Thus, as clearly outlined in a recent insightful review on the mechanism of biocompatibility [5], the classic solid biodegradable scaffold-based

Back to the future: developmental biology origin of minitissue-based tissue engineering concept

One of the most logical and obvious ways to look for possible alternatives to solid biodegradable scaffold-based tissue engineering approaches is to understand how tissues and organs are formed during normal embryonic development. The knowledge of developmental biology as a science can provide powerful insights for tissue engineering as a technology [6]. In this context, probably the most interesting fact is that, during embryonic development, tissues and organs are formed without any solid

Material properties of tissue spheroids

A recently published review paper with the characteristic title “Cell as a material” [32] logically implies that minitissues, and more specifically tissue spheroids, can also be considered as a material or more correctly a “living material” with certain measurable, evolving and potentially controllable material properties (Fig. 1). The most popular direct method for measuring material properties of rounded microtissues is tensiometry or controlled compression of cell aggregates between two

Organ printing as directed tissue self-assembly

The term “directed tissue self-assembly” looks like a strange combination of words because it is basically a contradiction of terms. One can logically argue that it can be either “directed assembly” or “self-assembly”, but not both together. However, we found an even more controversial combination of words in the title of a recently published Nature paper: “Self-directed self-assembly of nanoparticle/copolymer mixtures” [49]. It is interesting that the authors of this paper use similar

Bioprinting of an intraorgan branched vascular tree

Another potential advantage of the minitissue-based approach is its promise to solve the problem of vascularization of thick tissue constructs, arguably the most critical and still unsolved problem in tissue engineering. Recent reviews on this topic summarized the existing approaches to vascularization and stated that the optimal solution of this problem has not yet been found [19], [20], [21]. Moreover, even the term and the meaning of the word “vascularization” is basically not very well

Concept of accelerated tissue maturation

The biomimetic concept of accelerated tissue maturation in microtissue-based approaches implies that the desirable material and biomechanical properties of engineered constructs could be rapidly achieved without using supporting biodegradable solid scaffolds. In order to achieve specified biomechanical properties of tissue engineered constructs it is essential to know in advance not only the material properties of mature adult human issues and organs, but also the developmental kinetics of

Conclusions and perspectives

The emerging microtissue-based approach emphasizes the increasing recognition of the value of fundamental developmental biology expertise in tissue engineering, which is extending far beyond the already generally accepted fundamental role of research in stem cell biology and regenerative biology in advancing tissue engineering. Thus, it is safe to state that the ongoing integration of developmental biology and tissue engineering is already a work in progress. However, it will be also

Acknowledgment

Work was funded by NSF FIBR and MUSC Bioprinting Research Center grants, P20-RR1-16434 from the NCRR and P20-RR1-6461 from the SC IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence.

References (70)

  • K. Braeckmans et al.

    Three-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with the confocal scanning laser microscope

    Biophys J

    (2003)
  • P. Bartholoma et al.

    A more aggressive breast cancer spheroid model coupled to an electronic capillary sensor system for a high-content screening of cytotoxic agents in cancer therapy: 3-dimensional in vitro tumor spheroids as a screening model

    J Biomol Screen

    (2005)
  • L.A. Kunz-Schughart et al.

    The use of 3-D cultures for high-throughput screening: the multicellular spheroid model

    J Biomol Screen

    (2004)
  • Q. Tang et al.

    Preparing engineered tissues in vitro by macroporous microcarriers

    Chin J Biotechnol

    (2008)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Hyaluronan in limb morphogenesis

    Dev Biol

    (2007)
  • V. Mironov et al.

    Nanotechnology in vascular tissue engineering: from nanoscaffolding towards rapid vessel biofabrication

    Trends Biotechnol

    (2008)
  • J.M. Kelm et al.

    Microscale tissue engineering using gravity-enforced cell assembly

    Trends Biotechnol

    (2004)
  • P.G. Layer et al.

    Of layers and spheres: the reaggregate approach in tissue engineering

    Trends Neurosci

    (2002)
  • L.G. Griffith et al.

    Tissue engineering – current challenges and expanding opportunities

    Science

    (2002)
  • R. Langer et al.

    Tissue engineering

    Science

    (1993)
  • V. Mironov et al.

    Organ printing: promises and challenges

    Regen Med

    (2008)
  • F. Marga et al.

    Developmental biology and tissue engineering

    Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today

    (2007)
  • D.L. Steer et al.

    Developmental approaches to kidney tissue engineering

    Am J Physiol Renal Physiol

    (2004)
  • D.E. Ingber et al.

    Tissue engineering and developmental biology: going biomimetic

    Tissue Eng

    (2006)
  • D.W. Hutmacher

    Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues – state of the art and future perspectives

    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed

    (2001)
  • D.W. Hutmacher et al.

    State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective

    J Tissue Eng Regen Med

    (2007)
  • A. Khademhosseini et al.

    Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2006)
  • R. Langer

    Tissue engineering: perspectives, challenges, and future directions

    Tissue Eng

    (2007)
  • R.R. Lareu et al.

    In vitro enhancement of collagen matrix formation and crosslinking for applications in tissue engineering: a preliminary study

    Tissue Eng

    (2007)
  • C. Mason

    The time has come to engineer tissues and not just tissue engineer

    Regen Med

    (2006)
  • Z. Lokmic et al.

    Engineering the microcirculation

    Tissue Eng Part B Rev

    (2008)
  • J.J. Moon et al.

    Vascularization of engineered tissues: approaches to promote angio-genesis in biomaterials

    Curr Top Med Chem

    (2008)
  • C. Mason

    Regenerative medicine 2.0

    Regen Med

    (2007)
  • Cited by (1064)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Editor's Note: This paper is one of a newly instituted series of scientific articles that provide evidence-based scientific opinions on topical and important issues in biomaterials science. They have some features of an invited editorial but are based on scientific facts, and some features of a review paper, without attempting to be comprehensive. These papers have been commissioned by the Editor-in-Chief and reviewed for factual, scientific content by referees.

    View full text