Leading OpinionOrgan printing: Tissue spheroids as building blocks☆
Introduction
The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate natural-like functional human tissues and organs suitable for regeneration, repair and replacement of damaged, injured or lost human organs [1], [2], [3], [4]. The engineered tissues and organs are technically “artificial” or “man-made” based on methods of their generation, but at the same time they are also “natural-like” living tissues and organs. At least theoretically, an ideal tissue engineered human organ must eliminate, dramatically reduce, or more realistically reinvent the problem of biocompatibility [5], which is a critically important issue for any biomaterial-based approach for creating artificial organs, devices or prostheses. Without tissue engineering, living functional human organs can be produced only during natural embryonic development. How close tissue engineers can recapitulate and capture the most essential structure–function features of normal natural human tissues and organs, and how far they must try to imitate developmental histogenesis, morphogenesis and organogenesis, are still open for debate. Because of economic constraints and the intrinsic limitations of producing living tissues and organs, it is reasonable to assume that biofabrication technology will probably not allow one to create a 100% authentic copy of functional living human organs. Rather, engineering of natural-like functional vascularized tissue engineered organ constructs capable of restoring essential function is a more realistic technological goal and represent a great accomplishment if successful. Developmental processes already serve as a positive control or reference point and provide powerful insights into tissue engineering [6], [7]. Furthermore, the integration of developmental biology and tissue engineering, or the so-called biomimetic approach, is not wishful thinking but rather work in progress [8]. It is interesting that one initially suggested term for the tissue engineering field was “chimeric neomorphogenesis” [9]. Thus, it is safe to predict that deep understanding, biomimicking and employing developmental mechanisms of embryonic histogenesis and organogenesis can be very beneficial for tissue engineering. The goal of this paper is to introduce and discuss a novel, rapidly emerging developmental biology-inspired paradigm of solid biodegradable scaffold-free minitissue-based biomimetic approach, or more specifically, organ printing using self-assembled tissue spheroids as a possible alternative to classic solid biodegradable scaffold-based approach in the field of tissue engineering.
Section snippets
Intrinsic limitations of biodegradable solid scaffold-based approaches in tissue engineering
Classic biodegradable solid scaffold-based approaches, that still represent a dominating conceptual framework or paradigm in tissue engineering, originated from attempts by chemical engineers to create porous scaffolds from biodegradable polymers as a temporal template-like instructive support for cell attachment and tissue neomorphogenesis [9], [10]. Thus, as clearly outlined in a recent insightful review on the mechanism of biocompatibility [5], the classic solid biodegradable scaffold-based
Back to the future: developmental biology origin of minitissue-based tissue engineering concept
One of the most logical and obvious ways to look for possible alternatives to solid biodegradable scaffold-based tissue engineering approaches is to understand how tissues and organs are formed during normal embryonic development. The knowledge of developmental biology as a science can provide powerful insights for tissue engineering as a technology [6]. In this context, probably the most interesting fact is that, during embryonic development, tissues and organs are formed without any solid
Material properties of tissue spheroids
A recently published review paper with the characteristic title “Cell as a material” [32] logically implies that minitissues, and more specifically tissue spheroids, can also be considered as a material or more correctly a “living material” with certain measurable, evolving and potentially controllable material properties (Fig. 1). The most popular direct method for measuring material properties of rounded microtissues is tensiometry or controlled compression of cell aggregates between two
Organ printing as directed tissue self-assembly
The term “directed tissue self-assembly” looks like a strange combination of words because it is basically a contradiction of terms. One can logically argue that it can be either “directed assembly” or “self-assembly”, but not both together. However, we found an even more controversial combination of words in the title of a recently published Nature paper: “Self-directed self-assembly of nanoparticle/copolymer mixtures” [49]. It is interesting that the authors of this paper use similar
Bioprinting of an intraorgan branched vascular tree
Another potential advantage of the minitissue-based approach is its promise to solve the problem of vascularization of thick tissue constructs, arguably the most critical and still unsolved problem in tissue engineering. Recent reviews on this topic summarized the existing approaches to vascularization and stated that the optimal solution of this problem has not yet been found [19], [20], [21]. Moreover, even the term and the meaning of the word “vascularization” is basically not very well
Concept of accelerated tissue maturation
The biomimetic concept of accelerated tissue maturation in microtissue-based approaches implies that the desirable material and biomechanical properties of engineered constructs could be rapidly achieved without using supporting biodegradable solid scaffolds. In order to achieve specified biomechanical properties of tissue engineered constructs it is essential to know in advance not only the material properties of mature adult human issues and organs, but also the developmental kinetics of
Conclusions and perspectives
The emerging microtissue-based approach emphasizes the increasing recognition of the value of fundamental developmental biology expertise in tissue engineering, which is extending far beyond the already generally accepted fundamental role of research in stem cell biology and regenerative biology in advancing tissue engineering. Thus, it is safe to state that the ongoing integration of developmental biology and tissue engineering is already a work in progress. However, it will be also
Acknowledgment
Work was funded by NSF FIBR and MUSC Bioprinting Research Center grants, P20-RR1-16434 from the NCRR and P20-RR1-6461 from the SC IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence.
References (70)
- et al.
Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering
Trends Biotechnol
(2003) On the mechanisms of biocompatibility
Biomaterials
(2008)- et al.
Selective cell transplantation using bioabsorbable artificial polymers as matrices
J Pediatr Surg
(1988) - et al.
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Cell
(2006) - et al.
Collagen matrix deposition is dramatically enhanced in vitro when crowded with charged macromolecules: the biological relevance of the excluded volume effect
FEBS Lett
(2007) - et al.
Vascularization in tissue engineering
Trends Biotechnol
(2008) - et al.
The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation
Dev Biol
(2005) Differential adhesion in morphogenesis: a modern view
Curr Opin Genet Dev
(2007)- et al.
The cell as a material
Curr Opin Cell Biol
(2007) - et al.
Viscoelastic properties of living embryonic tissues: a quantitative study
Biophys J
(1998)
Three-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with the confocal scanning laser microscope
Biophys J
A more aggressive breast cancer spheroid model coupled to an electronic capillary sensor system for a high-content screening of cytotoxic agents in cancer therapy: 3-dimensional in vitro tumor spheroids as a screening model
J Biomol Screen
The use of 3-D cultures for high-throughput screening: the multicellular spheroid model
J Biomol Screen
Preparing engineered tissues in vitro by macroporous microcarriers
Chin J Biotechnol
Hyaluronan in limb morphogenesis
Dev Biol
Nanotechnology in vascular tissue engineering: from nanoscaffolding towards rapid vessel biofabrication
Trends Biotechnol
Microscale tissue engineering using gravity-enforced cell assembly
Trends Biotechnol
Of layers and spheres: the reaggregate approach in tissue engineering
Trends Neurosci
Tissue engineering – current challenges and expanding opportunities
Science
Tissue engineering
Science
Organ printing: promises and challenges
Regen Med
Developmental biology and tissue engineering
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today
Developmental approaches to kidney tissue engineering
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
Tissue engineering and developmental biology: going biomimetic
Tissue Eng
Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues – state of the art and future perspectives
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed
State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective
J Tissue Eng Regen Med
Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Tissue engineering: perspectives, challenges, and future directions
Tissue Eng
In vitro enhancement of collagen matrix formation and crosslinking for applications in tissue engineering: a preliminary study
Tissue Eng
The time has come to engineer tissues and not just tissue engineer
Regen Med
Engineering the microcirculation
Tissue Eng Part B Rev
Vascularization of engineered tissues: approaches to promote angio-genesis in biomaterials
Curr Top Med Chem
Regenerative medicine 2.0
Regen Med
Cited by (1064)
Printing of 3D biomimetic structures for the study of bone metastasis: A review
2024, Acta BiomaterialiaLIFT of cell spheroids: Proof of concept
2023, BioprintingVisible light photocrosslinking of sugar beet pectin for 3D bioprinting applications
2023, Carbohydrate Polymers3D printing algae-based materials: Pathway towards 4D bioprinting
2023, Bioprinting
- ☆
Editor's Note: This paper is one of a newly instituted series of scientific articles that provide evidence-based scientific opinions on topical and important issues in biomaterials science. They have some features of an invited editorial but are based on scientific facts, and some features of a review paper, without attempting to be comprehensive. These papers have been commissioned by the Editor-in-Chief and reviewed for factual, scientific content by referees.